Cited by 88Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Statin Trials, Cardiovascular Events, and Coronary Artery Calcification

Open access
Mortensen, Martin Bødtker, Falk, Erling, Li, Dong, Nasir, Khurram, Blaha, Michael J., Sandfort, Veit, Rodriguez, Carlos Jose, Ouyang, Pamela +1 more·2018·JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to determine whether coronary artery calcium (CAC) could be used to optimize statin allocation among individuals for whom trial-based evidence supports efficacy of statin therapy.Background Recently, allocation of statins was proposed for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) based on proven efficacy from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of statin therapy, a so-called trial-based approach.Methods The study used data from MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) with 5,600 men and women, 45 to 84 years of age, and free of clinical ASCVD, lipid-lowering therapy, or missing information for risk factors at baseline examination.Results During 10 years' follow-up, 354 ASCVD and 219 hard coronary heart disease (CHD) events occurred. Based on enrollment criteria for 7 RCTs of statin therapy in primary prevention, 73% of MESA participants (91% of those >55 years of age) were eligible for statin therapy according to a trial-based approach. Among those individuals, CAC = 0 was common (44%) and was associated with low rates of ASCVD and CHD (3.9 and 1.7, respectively, per 1,000 person-years). There was a graded increase in event rates with increasing CAC score, and in individuals with CAC >100 (27% of participants) the rates of ASCVD and CHD were 18.9 and 12.7, respectively. Consequently, the estimated number needed to treat (NNT) in 10 years to prevent 1 event varied greatly according to CAC score. For ASCVD events, the NNT was 87 for CAC = 0 and 19 for CAC >100. For CHD events, the NNT was 197 for CAC = 0 and 28 for CAC >100.Conclusions Most MESA participants qualified for trial-based primary prevention with statins. Among the individuals for whom trial-based evidence supports efficacy of statin therapy, CAC = 0 and CAC >100 were common and associated with low and high cardiovascular risks, respectively. This information may guide shared decision making aimed at targeting evidence-based statins to those who are likely to benefit the most.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.01.029

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mortensen, M. B., Falk, E., Li, D., Nasir, K., Blaha, M. J., Sandfort, V., Rodriguez, C. J., Ouyang, P., & Budoff, M.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Mortensen, Martin Bødtker
Venue
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
221-230
ISSN
  • 1876-7591 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-878X
OpenAlex
W2730247497
Cited by
88
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
11.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
  • National Institutes of Health (n01hc95164-17-0-1, n01hc95165-34-0-1, n01hc95161-24-0-1, n01hc095169-003, n01hc95166-21-0-1, n01hc95162-31-0-1, n01hc95168-27-0-1, n01hc95160-18-0-1, n01hc095167-000, UL1TR001079, n01hc95163-22-0-1, n01hc95159-40-0-1, UL1TR000040)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (N01-HC095169, N01-HC-095165, N01 HC095163, N01-HC-095159, N01 HC095168, N01-HC-095162, N01-HC-095161, HHSN268201500003C, HHSN26820150 0003I, N01 HC095167, N01-HC-095160, N01 HC095166, N01 HC095164)
  • National Center for Research Resources (N01-HC-95168, N01 HC 95169)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
coronary artery calcium, statin therapy, primary prevention, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, number needed to treat, cardiovascular risk stratification, shared decision-making, MESA
MeSH terms
Clinical Decision-Making, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Coronary Artery Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Prevention, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Coronary Angiography, Patient Selection, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Evidence-Based Medicine, Dyslipidemias, Vascular Calcification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review