Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Formulation and coating of microneedles with inactivated influenza virus to improve vaccine stability and immunogenicity

Open access
Kim, Yeu-Chun, Quan, Fu-Shi, Compans, Richard W., Kang, Sang-Moo, Prausnitz, Mark R.·2010·Journal of Controlled Release

Abstract

Microneedle patches coated with solid-state influenza vaccine have been developed to improve vaccine efficacy and patient coverage. However, dip coating microneedles with influenza vaccine can reduce antigen activity. In this study, we sought to determine the experimental factors and mechanistic pathways by which inactivated influenza vaccine can lose activity, as well as develop and assess improved microneedle coating formulations that protect the antigen from activity loss. After coating microneedles using a standard vaccine formulation, antigenicity was reduced to just 2%, as measured by hemagglutination activity. The presence of carboxymethylcellulose, which was added to increase viscosity of the coating formulation, was shown to contribute to vaccine activity loss. After screening a panel of candidate stabilizers, the addition of trehalose to the coating formulation was shown to protect the antigen and retain 48–82% antigen activity for all three major strains of seasonal influenza: H1N1, H3N2 and B. Influenza vaccine coated in this way also exhibited thermal stability, such that activity loss was independent of temperature over the range of 4 – 37°C for 24 h. Dynamic light scattering measurements showed that antigen activity loss was associated with virus particle aggregation, and that stabilization using trehalose largely blocked this aggregation. Finally, microneedles using an optimized vaccine coating formulation were applied to the skin to vaccinate mice. Microneedle vaccination induced robust systemic and functional antibodies and provided complete protection against lethal challenge infection similar to conventional intramuscular injection. Overall, these results show that antigen activity loss during microneedle coating can be largely prevented through optimized formulation and that stabilized microneedle patches can be used for effective vaccination.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.10.013

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Kim, Y.-C., Quan, F.-S., Compans, R. W., Kang, S.-M., & Prausnitz, M. R.
Venue
Journal of Controlled Release
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
142
Issue
2
Pages
187-195
ISSN
0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054469972
Cited by
255
References
3
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Formulation and coating of microneedles with inactivated influenza virus to improve vaccine stability and immunogenicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.10.013
The paper
Kim, Y.-C., Quan, F.-S., Compans, R. W., Kang, S.-M., & Prausnitz, M. R. (2010). Formulation and coating of microneedles with inactivated influenza virus to improve vaccine stability and immunogenicity. Journal of Controlled Release. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.10.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.