The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors controlling the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and intratumoral penetration of nanoparticles
Open accessAbstract
Nanoparticle drug delivery to the tumor is impacted by multiple factors: nanoparticles must evade clearance by renal filtration and the reticuloendothelial system, extravasate through the enlarged endothelial gaps in tumors, penetrate through dense stroma in the tumor microenvironment to reach the tumor cells, remain in the tumor tissue for a prolonged period of time, and finally release the active agent to induce pharmacological effect. The physicochemical properties of nanoparticles such as size, shape, surface charge, surface chemistry (PEGylation, ligand conjugation) and composition affect the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, intratumoral penetration and tumor bioavailability. On the other hand, tumor biology (blood flow, perfusion, permeability, interstitial fluid pressure and stroma content) and patient characteristics (age, gender, tumor type, tumor location, body composition and prior treatments) also have impact on drug delivery by nanoparticles. It is now believed that both nanoparticles and the tumor microenvironment have to be optimized or adjusted for optimal delivery. This review provides a comprehensive summary of how these nanoparticle and biological factors impact nanoparticle delivery to tumors, with discussion on how the tumor microenvironment can be adjusted and how patients can be stratified by imaging methods to receive the maximal benefit of nanomedicine. Perspectives and future directions are also provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation
Hanahan, D., & Weinberg, R. A. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013 · Cited by 66,590
Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases
Carmeliet, P., & Jain, R. K. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35025220 · Cited by 9,070
Liposomal drug delivery systems: From concept to clinical applications
Allen, T. M., & Cullis, P. R. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.037 · Cited by 4,839
Kalluri, R., & Zeisberg, M. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1877 · Cited by 4,538
Renal clearance of quantum dots
Soo Choi, H., Liu, W., Misra, P., Tanaka, E., Zimmer, J. P., Itty Ipe, B., Bawendi, M. G., & Frangioni, J. V. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1340 · Cited by 4,476
Tumors: Wounds That Do Not Heal
Flier, J. S., Underhill, L. H., & Dvorak, H. F. (1986) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198612253152606 · Cited by 4,391 · cited 2×
“immune cells, and extracellular matrix (ECM), which are collectively termed stroma, and is the dominant fraction of the total tumor mass [104, 105].”
BackgroundFactors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles
Alexis, F., Pridgen, E., Molnar, L. K., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2008) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/mp800051m · Cited by 3,699
The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways
Gratton, S. E. A., Ropp, P. A., Pohlhaus, P. D., Luft, J. C., Madden, V. J., Napier, M. E., & DeSimone, J. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0801763105 · Cited by 2,918
Accumulation of sub-100 nm polymeric micelles in poorly permeable tumours depends on size
Cabral, H., Matsumoto, Y., Mizuno, K., Chen, Q., Murakami, M., Kimura, M., Terada, Y., Kano, M. R., Miyazono, K., Uesaka, M., et al. (2011) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.166 · Cited by 2,429
Self-citationMaeda, H., Nakamura, H., & Fang, J. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.10.002 · Cited by 2,376
Cited by
Progress and challenges towards targeted delivery of cancer therapeutics
Rosenblum, D., Joshi, N., Tao, W., Karp, J. M., & Peer, D. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03705-y · Cited by 2,220
Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine
Pelaz, B., Alexiou, C., Alvarez-Puebla, R. A., Alves, F., Andrews, A. M., Ashraf, S., Balogh, L. P., Ballerini, L., Bestetti, A., Brendel, C., et al. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b06040 · Cited by 1,350
Lipid nanoparticles enabling gene therapies: from concepts to clinical utility
Kulkarni, J. A., Cullis, P. R., & van der Meel, R. (2018) · Nucleic Acid Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/nat.2018.0721 · Cited by 592
Three-Dimensional Spheroids as In Vitro Preclinical Models for Cancer Research
Pinto, B., Henriques, A. C., Silva, P. M. A., & Bousbaa, H. (2020) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics12121186 · Cited by 440
Black, K. C. L., Wang, Y., Luehmann, H. P., Cai, X., Xing, W., Pang, B., Zhao, Y., Cutler, C. S., Wang, L. V., Liu, Y., et al. (2014) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn406258m · Cited by 365
Metadata
- Authors
- Ernsting, M. J., Murakami, M., Roy, A., & Li, S.-D.
- Venue
- Journal of Controlled Release
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 172
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 782-794
- ISSN
- 0168-3659 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1963675633
- Cited by
- 1,012
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 22.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors controlling the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and intratumoral penetration of nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.013
- The paper
- Ernsting, M. J., Murakami, M., Roy, A., & Li, S.-D. (2013). Factors controlling the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and intratumoral penetration of nanoparticles. Journal of Controlled Release. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.09.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
