The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment
Abstract
As mouse‐driven desktop computers give way to touchpad laptops and touchscreen tablets, the role of touch in online consumer behavior has become increasingly important. This work presents initial explorations into the effects of varying touch‐based interfaces on consumers, and argues that research into the interfaces used to access content can be as important as research into the content itself. Two laboratory studies using a variety of touch technologies explore how touchscreen interfaces can increase perceived psychological ownership, and this in turn magnifies the endowment effect. Touch interfaces also interact with importance of product haptics and actual interface ownership in their effects on perceived product ownership, with stronger effects for products high in haptic importance and interfaces that are owned. Results highlight that perceptions of online products and marketing activities are filtered through the lens of the interfaces used to explore them, and touch‐based devices like tablets can lead to higher product valuations when compared to traditional computers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028 · Cited by 3,403
Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1990) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261737 · Cited by 3,194 · cited 4×
“The endowment effect causes consumers to overvalue items they perceive they own (Franciosi, Kujal, Michelitsch, Smith, & Deng 1996), leading to a gap between what someone is willing to pay to acquire an item (WTP) and what they will accept to part with it (WTA: Kahneman, Knetsch, & Thaler, 1990).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExperimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (2000) · Behavioral Law and Economics · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175197.009 · Cited by 2,873
The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research
Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84 · Cited by 2,038
Krishna, A. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2011.08.003 · Cited by 1,661
The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership
Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/598614 · Cited by 815
Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: The “Need for Touch” Scale
Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/378619 · Cited by 670
Schlosser, A. E. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/376807 · Cited by 667
To have and to Hold: The Influence of Haptic Information on Product Judgments
Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612 · Cited by 617
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/661531 · Cited by 465
Cited by
Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.15.0420 · Cited by 5,765
On the Go: how mobile shopping affects customer purchase behavior.
Wang, R. J.-H., Malthouse, E. C., & Krishnamurthi, L. (2015) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2015.01.002 · Cited by 559
Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: A review and introduction
Krishna, A., & Schwarz, N. (2014) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2013.12.006 · Cited by 552
What catalyses mobile apps usage intention: An empirical analysis
Hew, J.-J., Lee, V.-H., Ooi, K.-B., & Wei, J. (2015) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/imds-01-2015-0028 · Cited by 383
The merchants of meta: A research agenda to understand the future of retailing in the metaverse
Yoo, K., Welden, R., Hewett, K., & Haenlein, M. (2023) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2023.02.002 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-11-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 226-233
- ISSN
- 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7663
- OpenAlex
- W2083515807
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 20.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.10.003
- The paper
- Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2014). Tablets, touchscreens, and touchpads: How varying touch interfaces trigger psychological ownership and endowment. Journal of Consumer Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.10.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
