The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
To have and to Hold: The Influence of Haptic Information on Product Judgments
Abstract
Haptic information, or information attained through touch by the hands, is important for the evaluation of products that vary in terms of material properties related to texture, hardness, temperature, and weight. The authors develop and propose a conceptual framework to illustrate that salience of haptic information differs significantly across products, consumers, and situations. The authors use two experiments to assess how these factors interact to impair or enhance the acquisition and use of haptic information. Barriers to touch, such as a retail display case, can inhibit the use of haptic information and consequently decrease confidence in product evaluations and increase the frustration level of consumers who are more motivated to touch products. In addition, written descriptions and visual depictions of products can partially enhance acquisition of certain types of touch information. The authors synthesize the results of these studies and discuss implications for the effect of haptic information for Internet and other nonstore retailing as well as for traditional retailers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion
Weiner, B. (1985) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.92.4.548 · Cited by 7,846
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- Ackerman Diane, 1990, A Natural History of the Senses.
- 10.1177/002224299706100303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002224298304700308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/209337 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/208501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1007963128115 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224298204600407 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327663jcp0702_02 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00177.x · DOI · Paper page
- Gibson James J., 1966, The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems.
- Hof Robert D., 1998, BusinessWeek, 122
- 10.1086/208906 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/209314 · DOI · Paper page
- Houston Michael J., 1978, 1978 Educators’ Proceedings, 184
- 10.1086/209159 · DOI · Paper page
- Katz David, 1925, The World of Touch
- 10.1509/jmkg.64.2.66.18000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/208527 · DOI · Paper page
- Klatzky Roberta L., 1987, The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 121
- 10.3758/BF03211702 · DOI
- 10.1068/p220597 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.726 · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.19.4.726
- 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90008-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/208919 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.679 · DOI
- Montagu Ashley, 1986, Touching: The Human Significance of the Skin.
- Olson Jerry C., 1972, Advances in Consumer Research, 2, 167
- Peck Joann, 2002, “Individual Differences in Haptic Information Processing: On the Development, Validation, and Use of the ‘Need for Touch’ Scale,”
- 10.1086/208954 · DOI · Paper page
- Révész Géza, 1950, Psychology and Art of the Blind
- Romano Beda, 2000, USA Today, D3
- 10.1177/002224378302000304 · DOI · Paper page
- Spreen Otfried, 1991, A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary.
- 10.1177/002224298404800203 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80053-8 · DOI
- Underhill Paco, 1999, Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping.
Cited by
Elhai, J. D., Levine, J. C., Dvorak, R. D., & Hall, B. J. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.079 · Cited by 1,020
Flow online: lessons learned and future prospects.
Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2009) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2008.10.003 · Cited by 954
Schlosser, A. E., White, T. B., & Lloyd, S. M. (2006) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.2.133 · Cited by 947
Weathers, D., Sharma, S., & Wood, S. L. (2007) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2007.03.009 · Cited by 439
The influence of tactile input on the evaluation of retail product offerings
Grohmann, B., Spangenberg, E. R., & Sprott, D. E. (2007) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2006.09.001 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Peck, J., & Childers, T. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 35-48
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2113293638
- Cited by
- 617
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: To have and to Hold: The Influence of Haptic Information on Product Judgments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612
- The paper
- Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). To have and to Hold: The Influence of Haptic Information on Product Judgments. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.35.18612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.