The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of particle size on kinetics of starch digestion in milled barley and sorghum grains by porcine alpha-amylase
Abstract
The influence of milled grain particle size on the kinetics of enzymatic starch digestion was examined. Two types of cereals (barley and sorghum) were ground, and the resulting grounds separated by size using sieving, with sizes ranging from approximately 0.1 to approximately 3 mm. In vitro enzymatic digestion was performed, using pancreatic alpha-amylase, amyloglucosidase and protease, to determine fractional-digestion rates over 24 h. The resulting glucose production rate data were well fitted by simple first-order kinetics. For each sieve screen size, the digestion rate of barley was always higher than that of sorghum. The rate coefficients for digestion showed a decrease with increasing size, and could be well fitted by an inverse square relationship. This is consistent with the supposition that starch digestion in these systems is controlled by diffusion of enzyme through the grain fragment. Apparent diffusion coefficients of alpha-amylase obtained by fitting the size dependence were 0.76 (sorghum) and 1.7 (barley) x 10(-7) cm2 s-1, 9 (sorghum) and 4 (barley) times slower than predicted for a molecule of the size of alpha-amylase in water.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Food particle size, for example, is an important predictor of starch bioaccessibility, as the fractured particle surface is exposed to enzymes, whereas diffusion is required for enzymes to access starch in the underlying cell layers (Al-Rabadi et al., 2009).”
From Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health (2017) · cites this paper as Al-Rabadi et al., 2009
Citations
Cites
Carslaw, H. S., & Jaeger, J. C. (1947) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 19,877
Crank, J. (1956) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 18,978
Tranter, C. J. (1959) · Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids · doi:10.1016/0022-5096(59)90029-8 · Cited by 18,518
A starch hydrolysis procedure to estimate glycemic index
Goñi, I., García‐Alonso, A., & Saura-Calixto, F. D. (1997) · Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/s0271-5317(97)00010-9 · Cited by 2,135
Sajilata, M. G., Singhal, R. S., & Kulkarni, P. R. (2006) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/j.1541-4337.2006.tb00076.x · Cited by 1,660
Conduction of Heat in Solids, Second Edition
Carslow, H. S., Jaeger, J. C., & Morral, J. E. (1986) · Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology · doi:10.1115/1.3225900 · Cited by 1,025
Williams, M. M. R. (1977) · Annals of Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/0306-4549(77)90072-x · Cited by 964
Factors Affecting Starch Digestibility with Special Emphasis on Sorghum and Corn1
Rooney, L. W., & Pflugfelder, R. L. (1986) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/jas1986.6351607x · Cited by 644
Boisen, S., & Fernández, J. A. (1997) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/s0377-8401(97)00058-8 · Cited by 409
Effect of Small and Large Wheat Starch Granules on Thermomechanical Behavior of Starch
Chiotelli, E., & Meste, M. L. (2002) · Cereal Chemistry · doi:10.1094/cchem.2002.79.2.286 · Cited by 273
Starch Hydrolysis by the Ruminal Microflora ,
Kotarski, S. F., KWaniska, R. D., & Thurn, K. K. (1992) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/122.1.178 · Cited by 248
Htoon, A., Shrestha, A. K., Flanagan, B. M., Lopez-Rubio, A., Bird, A. R., Gilbert, E. P., & Gidley, M. J. (2009) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.06.016 · Cited by 232
Self-citationImproving the in vitro protein digestibility of sorghum with reducing agents
Hamaker, B. R., Kirleis, A. W., Butler, L. G., Axtell, J. D., & Mertz, E. T. (1987) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.84.3.626 · Cited by 213
Ezeogu, L. I., Duodu, K. G., & TAYLOR, J. R. N. (2005) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2005.02.002 · Cited by 187
Low α‐Amylase Starch Digestibility of Cooked Sorghum Flours and the Effect of Protein
Zhang, G., & Hamaker, B. R. (1998) · Cereal Chemistry · doi:10.1094/cchem.1998.75.5.710 · Cited by 134
Muir, J., Birkett, A., Brown, I., Jones, G., & O’Dea, K. (1995) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/61.1.82 · Cited by 106
Weurding, R. E., Veldman, A., Veen, W. A. G., van der Aar, P. J., & Verstegen, M. W. A. (2001) · Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/131.9.2336 · Cited by 102
An approach to the influence of nutrients and other food constituents on resistant starch formation
Escarpa, A., González, M. C., Morales, M. D., & Saura-Calixto, F. D. (1997) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0308-8146(97)00025-3 · Cited by 100
Payan, F., Haser, R., Pierrot, M., Frey, M., Astier, J. P., Abadie, B., Duée, B., & Buisson, G. (1980) · Acta Crystallographica Section B · doi:10.1107/s0567740880003378 · Cited by 90
The relation between starch digestion rate and amino acid level for broiler chickens
Weurding, R. E., Enting, H., & Verstegen, M. (2003) · Poultry Science · doi:10.1093/ps/82.2.279 · Cited by 88
Helbert, W., Schülein, M., & Henrissat, B. (1996) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/0141-8130(96)01123-3 · Cited by 79
Blasel, H. M., Hoffman, P. C., & SHAVER, R. D. (2005) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.018 · Cited by 75
Williamson, G., Belshaw, N. J., Self, D. J., Noel, T. R., Ring, S. G., Cairns, P., Morris, V. J., Clark, S. A., & Parker, M. L. (1992) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/0144-8617(92)90062-u · Cited by 74
Kong, B.-W., Kim, J.-I., Kim, M.-J., & Kim, J. C. (2003) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp034005m · Cited by 72
In vitro Effects of Phytic Acid and Polyphenols on Starch Digestion and Fiber Degradation
Björck, I., & NYMAN, M. E. (1987) · Journal of Food Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb05885.x · Cited by 56
The Surface Chemistry of Starch Granules Studied by Time-of-Flight Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry
Baldwin, P. M., Melia, C. D., & Davies, M. C. (1997) · Journal of Cereal Science · doi:10.1006/jcrs.1997.0132 · Cited by 53
Kinetics of enzymatic digestion of feeds as estimated by a stepwise in vitro method
Wilfart, A., Jaguelin-Peyraud, Y., Simmins, H., Noblet, J., van Milgen, J. J., & Montagné, L. (2007) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.021 · Cited by 41
A step-wise in vitro method to estimate kinetics of hydrolysis of feeds
Wilfart, A., Jaguelin-Peyraud, Y., Simmins, H., Noblet, J., van Milgen, J. J., & Montagné, L. (2007) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2007.01.139 · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health
Lovegrove, A., Edwards, C. H., De Noni, I., Patel, H., El, S. N., Grassby, T., Zielke, C., Ulmius, M., Nilsson, L., Butterworth, P. J., et al. (2017) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2014.939263 · Cited by 606
“Food particle size, for example, is an important predictor of starch bioaccessibility, as the fractured particle surface is exposed to enzymes, whereas diffusion is required for enzymes to access starch in the underlying cell layers (Al-Rabadi et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMechanisms of starch digestion by α -amylase—Structural basis for kinetic properties
Dhital, S., Warren, F. J., Butterworth, P., Ellis, P. R., & Gidley, M. J. (2015) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2014.922043 · Cited by 521
Self-citationDona, A. C., Pagés, G., Gilbert, R. G., & Kuchel, P. W. (2010) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.01.002 · Cited by 399
Self-citationAnalysis of starch amylolysis using plots for first-order kinetics
Butterworth, P., Warren, F. J., Grassby, T., Patel, H., & Ellis, P. R. (2011) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.10.048 · Cited by 382
Relationship between granule size and in vitro digestibility of maize and potato starches
Dhital, S., Shrestha, A. K., & Gidley, M. J. (2010) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.05.018 · Cited by 381
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Rabadi, G. J. S., Gilbert, R. G., & Gidley, M. J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Gidley, Michael J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cereal Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 198-204
- ISSN
- 0733-5210 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970569398
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Cereal Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytase and its Applications
- Keywords
- starch hydrolysis, particle size, sorghum, first-order kinetics, enzyme diffusion, diffusion coefficient, in vitro digestion, cereals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
