Cited by 72Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Restorative yoga and metabolic risk factors: The Practicing Restorative Yoga vs. Stretching for the Metabolic Syndrome (PRYSMS) randomized trial

Open access
Kanaya, Alka M., Araneta, Maria Rosario G., Pawlowsky, Sarah B., Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth, Grady, Deborah, Vittinghoff, Eric, Schembri, Michael, Chang, Ann +5 more·2014·Journal of Diabetes and its Complications

Abstract

Aims Intensive lifestyle change prevents type 2 diabetes but is difficult to sustain. Preliminary evidence suggests that yoga may improve metabolic factors. We tested a restorative yoga intervention vs. active stretching for metabolic outcomes.Methods In 2009-2012, we conducted a 48-week randomized trial comparing restorative yoga vs. stretching among underactive adults with the metabolic syndrome at the Universities of California, San Francisco and San Diego. We provided lifestyle counseling and a tapering series of 90-min group classes in the 24-week intervention period and 24-week maintenance period. Fasting and 2-h glucose, HbA1c, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, insulin, systolic blood pressure, visceral fat, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, 6- and 12-months.Results 180 participants were randomized and 135 (75%) completed the trial. At 12 months, fasting glucose decreased more in the yoga group than in the stretching group (-0.35 mmol/L vs. -0.03 mmol/L; p=0.002); there were no other significant differences between groups. At 6 months favorable changes within the yoga group included reductions in fasting glucose, insulin, and HbA1c and an increase in HDL-cholesterol that were not sustained at 1 year except changes in fasting glucose. The stretching group had a significant reduction in triglycerides at 6 months which was not sustained at 1 year but had improved quality of life at both time-points.Conclusions Restorative yoga was marginally better than stretching for improving fasting glucose but not other metabolic factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2013.12.001

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 48-week randomized controlled trial comparing restorative yoga to active stretching among adults with MetS found significantly lower fasting glucose in the yoga group at 12 months.

    “The investigators also conducted a 48-week randomized controlled trial comparing restorative yoga to active stretching among adults with MetS, finding significantly lower fasting glucose in the yoga group at 12 months (93).”

    From The CardioMetabolic Health Alliance (2015) · cites this paper as [93]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]Lasater JH Relax and Renew: Restful Yoga for Stressful Times, Second Edition 2011 Berkeley CA Rodmell

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kanaya, A. M., Araneta, M. R. G., Pawlowsky, S. B., Barrett-Connor, E., Grady, D., Vittinghoff, E., Schembri, M., Chang, A., Carrion-Petersen, M. L., Coggins, T., Tanori, D., Armas, J. M., & Cole, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Kanaya, Alka M.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes and its Complications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
406-412
ISSN
  • 0891-6632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1056-8727
OpenAlex
W2082104161
Cited by
71
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes and its Complications (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000004)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024131)
  • NIH Clinical Center
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R01AT004569)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
restorative yoga, metabolic syndrome, stretching, type 2 diabetes prevention, lifestyle intervention, fasting blood glucose, insulin, HbA1c, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, quality of life, sedentary adults, visceral fat, blood pressure
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Insulin, Life Style, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Triglycerides, Yoga, Treatment Outcome, Metabolic Syndrome, Muscle Stretching Exercises

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review