The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust and gender: An examination of behavior and beliefs in the Investment Game
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027 · Cited by 5,548
Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.
Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.100.3.283 · Cited by 1,068
Cited by
Gender Differences in Preferences
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · Cited by 5,694
Self-citationRevisiting gender differences: what we know and what lies ahead.
Meyers‐Levy, J., & Loken, B. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.06.003 · Cited by 614
A meta-analysis of online trust relationships in e-commerce.
Kim, Y., & Peterson, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2017.01.001 · Cited by 541
Navigating a social world with robot partners: A quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley
Mathur, M. B., & Reichling, D. B. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.008 · Cited by 439
Sex differences in cooperation: A meta-analytic review of social dilemmas.
Balliet, D., Li, N. P., Macfarlan, S. J., & Van Vugt, M. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0025354 · Cited by 349
Inferring on the intentions of others by hierarchical Bayesian learning
Diaconescu, A. O., Mathys, C., Weber, L. A. E., Daunizeau, J., Kasper, L., Lomakina, E. I., Fehr, E., & Stephan, K. E. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003810 · Cited by 219
It Isn’t Always Mutual: A Critical Review of Dyadic Trust
Korsgaard, M. A., Brower, H. H., & Lester, S. W. (2015) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314547521 · Cited by 175
The politics of interpersonal trust and reciprocity: An experimental approach
Carlin, R. E., & Love, G. J. (2013) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9181-x · Cited by 132
A meta-analysis of the weight of advice in decision-making
Bailey, P. E., Leon, T., Ebner, N. C., Moustafa, A. A., & Weidemann, G. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03573-2 · Cited by 82
More than friends: Popularity on Facebook and its role in impression formation
Scott, G. G. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12067 · Cited by 66
Gender differences in the antecedents of trust in mobile social networking services
Gong, X., Liu, Z., & Wu, T. (2021) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2018.1497162 · Cited by 18
The unkindest cut of all: A quantitative study of betrayal narratives
Lalot, F. (2023) · Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/casp.2738 · Cited by 8
Gender, knowledge, and trust in artificial intelligence: A classroom-based randomized experiment.
Dávila, A., El Fassi, I., Oyon, D., & Rudolf, N. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-25002-7 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Solnick, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 466-476
- ISSN
- 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066475837
- Cited by
- 563
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 44.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
