Cited by 18Technology Adoption and User BehaviourPrivacy, Security, and Data ProtectionCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

Gender differences in the antecedents of trust in mobile social networking services

Gong, Xiuyuan, Liu, Zhiying, Wu, Tailai·2021·The Service Industries Journal

Abstract

With the development of mobile Internet technology and smartphone devices, mobile social networking services (mobile SNS) have become increasingly popular in recent years. However, research that systematically investigates the antecedents of trust, especially the gender differences therein, in the context of mobile SNS has been scarce. Building upon social role theory (SRT), this study extends existing literature by exploring the driving forces of trust in mobile SNS for different genders. Data are collected from WeChat users and analysed through multigroup analysis. Results have confirmed that trust in mobile SNS is associated with antecedents including perceived satisfaction, social ties, system quality, reputation and structural assurance. Particularly, social ties and reputation have dominant effects on trust of male users, whereas structural assurance has a greater effect on trust of female users. Implications for both researchers and practitioners are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02642069.2018.1497162

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social ties among members of WeChat play an important role in trust in the WeChat platform in general.

    “Likewise, Gong et al. found that social ties among members of WeChat played an important role in trust in the WeChat platform in general [33,34].”
  • Trust in information on social media and trust in social media platforms both play a role in increasing people's use of social media.

    “The studies in our corpus show that trust in the information on social media [2,65], as well as trust in the social media platforms themselves [33,79], both play a role in increasing people's use of social media.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 122 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gong, X., Liu, Z., & Wu, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Zhiying
Venue
The Service Industries Journal
Published
2018-07-13
Volume
41
Issue
5-6
Pages
400-426
ISSN
  • 0264-2069 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9507
OpenAlex
W2884886402
Cited by
18
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Service Industries Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2017M622468)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71472172)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
gender differences, social role theory, perceived satisfaction, social ties, system quality, reputation, structural assurance, WeChat, smartphone users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review