Stereotypes and false consensus: How financial professionals predict risk preferences
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Behaviour biases affect the investment decision.
“Several pieces of research conclude that these behaviour biases affect the investment decision, i.e. (Hon-Snir et al., 2012;Roth and Voskort, 2014).”
From How financial literacy moderate the association between behaviour biases and investment decision? (2022) · cites this paper as Roth and Voskort, 2014
Cites
Financial literacy and stock market participation
van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.006 · Cited by 3,554 · see citing works
Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555280 · Cited by 2,400 · see citing works
An Experiment on Risk Taking and Evaluation Periods
Gneezy, U., & Potters, J. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555217 · Cited by 1,288 · see citing works
Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. S. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Heterogeneity in Risky Choice Behavior in a Broad Population
von Gaudecker, H.-M., van Soest, A., & Wengström, E. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.664 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How financial literacy moderate the association between behaviour biases and investment decision?
Adil, M., Singh, Y., & Ansari, M. S. (2022) · Asian Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1108/ajar-09-2020-0086 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roth, B., & Voskort, A.
- Affiliations
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Roth, Benjamin
- Venue
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 553-565
- ISSN
- 0167-2681 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972732878
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Keywords
- risk preferences, risk-taking, stereotypes, false consensus effect, prediction of others' behavior, financial professionals, students, demographic data, self-assessment, prediction accuracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
