Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estimating models of complex FDI: Are there third-country effects?

Baltagi, Badi H., Egger, Peter, Pfaffermayr, Michael·2007·Journal of Econometrics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.09.009

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Anderson, 2000, Why do nations trade (so little)?, Pacific Economic Review, 5, 115, 10.1111/1468-0106.00095 · DOI
  2. Anderson, 2003, Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle, American Economic Review, 93, 170, 10.1257/000282803321455214 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Baier, 2001, The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity, Journal of International Economics, 53, 1, 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00060-X · DOI · Paper page
  4. Baldwin, 2001, Multiproduct multinationals and reciprocal FDI dumping, Journal of International Economics, 54, 429, 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00099-4 · DOI
  5. Bergstrand, 1985, The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence, Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 474, 10.2307/1925976 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bergstrand, 1989, The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and factor-proportions theory in international trade, Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 143, 10.2307/1928061 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Blonigen, B.A., Davies, R.B., 2004. The effects of bilateral tax treaties on U.S. FDI activity. International Tax and Public Finance 11, 601–622. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Blonigen, 2003, Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise: comment, American Economic Review, 93, 980, 10.1257/000282803322157214 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Brainard, 1997, An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade, American Economic Review, 87, 520
  10. Carr, 2001, Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise, American Economic Review, 91, 693, 10.1257/aer.91.3.693 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Carr, 2003, Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise: reply, American Economic Review, 93, 693, 10.1257/000282803322157223 · doi:10.1257/000282803322157223
  12. Coughlin, 2000, Foreign direct investment in China: a spatial econometric study, The World Economy, 23, 1, 10.1111/1467-9701.t01-1-00260 · doi:10.1111/1467-9701.t01-1-00260
  13. Davies, R.B., 2005. Fragmentation of headquarter services and FDI. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, forthcoming. · DOI
  14. Dixit, 1977, Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review, 67, 297
  15. Egger, 2004, Distance, trade and FDI: a Hausman–Taylor SUR approach, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19, 227, 10.1002/jae.721 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Egger, 2004, Multilateral trade and investment liberalization: effects on welfare and GDP per capita convergence, Economics Letters, 84, 133, 10.1016/j.econlet.2003.12.020 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2003.12.020
  17. Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., Szeidl, A., 2003. Optimal integration strategies for the multinational firm. NBER Working Paper No. 10189, Cambridge, MA. · DOI
  18. Head, 1995, Agglomeration benefits and location choice: evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments in the United States, Journal of International Economics, 38, 223, 10.1016/0022-1996(94)01351-R · DOI · Paper page
  19. Helpman, 1984, A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations, Journal of Political Economy, 92, 451, 10.1086/261236 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Helpman, 1987, Imperfect competition and international trade: evidence from fourteen industrial countries, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 1, 62, 10.1016/0889-1583(87)90027-X · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kapoor, M., Kelejian, H.H., Prucha, I.R., 2005. Panel data models with spatially correlated error components. Journal of Econometrics, forthcoming.
  22. Limao, 2001, Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs and trade, World Bank Economic Review, 15, 451, 10.1093/wber/15.3.451 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Markusen, 1984, Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade, Journal of International Economics, 16, 205, 10.1016/S0022-1996(84)80001-X · DOI · Paper page
  24. Markusen, 2002, Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise, Review of International Economics, 10, 694, 10.1111/1467-9396.00359 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Markusen, 2000, The theory of endowment, intraindustry and multinational trade, Journal of International Economics, 52, 209, 10.1016/S0022-1996(99)00055-0 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 470

Metadata

Authors
Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M.
Venue
Journal of Econometrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
140
Issue
1
Pages
260-281
ISSN
0304-4076 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072755087
Cited by
470
References
3
FWCI
70.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating models of complex FDI: Are there third-country effects? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.09.009
The paper
Baltagi, B. H., Egger, P., & Pfaffermayr, M. (2007). Estimating models of complex FDI: Are there third-country effects? Journal of Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.09.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.