Concurrent validity and reliability of a novel wireless inertial measurement system to assess trunk movement
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION Assessment of movement dysfunctions commonly comprises trunk range of motion (ROM), movement or control impairment (MCI), repetitive movements (RM), and reposition error (RE). Inertial measurement unit (IMU)-systems could be used to quantify these movement dysfunctions in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel IMU-system when assessing movement dysfunctions in terms of concurrent validity and reliability. METHODS The concurrent validity of the IMU-system was tested against an optoelectronic system with 22 participants. The reliability of 14 movement dysfunction tests were analysed using generalizability theory and coefficient of variation, measuring 24 participants in seven trials on two days. RESULTS The IMU-system provided valid estimates of trunk movement in the primary movement direction when compared to the optoelectronic system. Reliability varied across tests and variables. On average, ROM and RM were more reliable, compared to MCI and RE tests. DISCUSSION When compared to the optoelectronic system, the IMU-system is valid for estimates of trunk movement in the primary movement direction. Four ROM, two MCI, one RM, and one RE test were identified as reliable and should be studied further for inter-subject comparisons and monitoring changes after an intervention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trunk reliability results are consistent and demonstrate good to excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC ≥0.8 except coronal plane fair to excellent 0.67 to 0.93).
“Results from these three studies are consistent and demonstrate good to excellent intra-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.8 except for coronal plane which is fair to excellent (0.67 to 0.93)) [46,66,68].”
From Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Joint Angle Estimation: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Hip intra-rater reliability is fair to excellent and inter-rater reliability varied across movements (good for walking ICC 0.4 to 0.74 and poor for jumping ICC ≤0.39).
“Intra-rater reliability is fair to excellent and inter-rater reliability varied across movements performed (good for walking [ICC of 0.4 to 0.74] and poor for jumping [ICC ≤ 0.39] [46,53,66]).”
From Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Joint Angle Estimation: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Errors reported for camera-based motion capture systems varied across movement planes and joints, similar to M/IMUs.
“Interestingly, and similar to M/IMUs, errors reported for camera-based motion capture systems varied across movement planes and joints.”
From Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Joint Angle Estimation: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Several studies have questioned the validity and accuracy of camera-based motion capture systems for certain joints and for complex movements.
“It is important to note here that, recently, several studies have questioned the validity and accuracy of camera-based motion capture systems for certain joints and for complex movements [46,54].”
From Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Joint Angle Estimation: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Errors ranging from 5 to 10° when compared to goniometer, inclinometer, and radiostereometric measurements have been evidenced for camera-based motion capture systems, the same error range as M/IMU systems.
“Indeed, errors ranging from 5 to 10° when compared to goniometer, inclinometer, and radiostereometric measurements have been evidenced (same error range as M/IMU systems).”
From Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Joint Angle Estimation: A Systematic Review (2019) · cites this paper as [46]
Cites
Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Streiner, D. L., Norman, G. R., & Cairney, J. (1989) · Cited by 9,595 · see citing works
Measures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science
Hopkins, W. G. (2000) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 · Cited by 4,635 · see citing works
Health Measurement Scales--A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use
Waclawski, E. (2010) · Occupational Medicine · doi:10.1093/occmed/kqp179 · Cited by 1,870 · see citing works
When to use agreement versus reliability measures
de Vet, H. C. W., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015 · Cited by 1,801 · see citing works
Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies
Webber, C. L., & Zbilut, J. P. (1994) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1994.76.2.965 · Cited by 1,429 · see citing works
Diagnosis and Treatment of Movement Impairment Syndromes
Sahrmann, S. A. (2001) · Cited by 1,269 · see citing works
The reliability of three-dimensional kinematic gait measurements: A systematic review
McGinley, J. L., Baker, R. J., Wolfe, R. S., & Morris, M. E. (2008) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.09.003 · Cited by 1,155 · see citing works
Recurrence-plot-based measures of complexity and their application to heart-rate-variability data
Marwan, N., Wessel, N., Meyerfeldt, U., Schirdewan, A., & Kurths, J. (2002) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.66.026702 · Cited by 994 · see citing works
Sensitivity of Smoothness Measures to Movement Duration, Amplitude, and Arrests
Hogan, N., & Sternad, D. (2009) · Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.3200/35-09-004-rc · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Laird, R. A., Gilbert, J., Kent, P., & Keating, J. L. (2014) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-229 · Cited by 426 · cited 7× · see citing works
“Clinicians commonly use range of motion and movement control tests of the trunk and hip to assist in identifying patterns of dysfunction and to monitor change (Laird et al., 2014).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe use of inertial sensors system for human motion analysis
Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., Galán-Mercant, A., & Williams, J. M. (2010) · Physical Therapy Reviews · doi:10.1179/1743288x11y.0000000006 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Rehabilitation research: Principles and applications
Ownsworth, T. (2005) · Australian Occupational Therapy Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2005.00478.x · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Rehabilitation research : principles and applications
Carter, R., Lubinsky, J., & Domholdt, E. (2005) · Elsevier eBooks · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Comparison of the performance of 3D camera systems II
Ehara, Y., Fujimoto, H., Miyazaki, S., et al. (1997) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/s0966-6362(96)01093-4 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Clinical Applications of Sensors for Human Posture and Movement Analysis: A Review
Wong, W. Y., Wong, M. S., & Lo, K. H. (2007) · Prosthetics & Orthotics International · doi:10.1080/03093640600983949 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Reliability of movement control tests in the lumbar spine
Luomajoki, H. A., Kool, J., de Bruin, E. D., & Airaksinen, O. (2007) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-8-90 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Self-citationA new technique for determining 3-D joint angles: the tilt/twist method
Crawford, N. R., Yamaguchi, G. T., & Dickman, C. A. (1999) · Clinical Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00080-1 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Trunk posture monitoring with inertial sensors
Wong, W. Y., & Wong, M. S. (2008) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0586-0 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Reliability of centre of pressure summary measures of postural steadiness in healthy young adults
Santos, B. R., Delisle, A., Larivière, C., Plamondon, A., & Imbeau, D. (2007) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.05.008 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Falls in Parkinson's disease: Kinematic evidence for impaired head and trunk control
Cole, M. H., Silburn, P. A., Wood, J. M., Worringham, C. J., & Kerr, G. (2010) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.23292 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Corriveau, H., Hébert, R., Prince, F., & Raı̂che, M. (2000) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90220-x · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Clinical tools to measure trunk performance after stroke: a systematic review of the literature
Verheyden, G., Nieuwboer, A., de Winckel, A. V., & Weerdt, W. D. (2007) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215507074055 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Roetenberg, D., Baten, C. T. M., & Veltink, P. H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2007.903946 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Surface EMG and acceleration signals in Parkinson’s disease: feature extraction and cluster analysis
Rissanen, S. M., Kankaanpaa, M. J., Meigal, A. Y., Tarvainen, M. P., Nuutinen, J., Tarkka, I. M., Airaksinen, O., & Karjalainen, P. A. (2008) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-008-0369-0 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Self-citationHa, T. H., Saber-Sheikh, K., Moore, A. P., & Jones, M. P. (2012) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2012.04.003 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Wearable Monitoring of Seated Spinal Posture
Dunne, L. E., Walsh, P. M., Hermann, S., et al. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems · doi:10.1109/tbcas.2008.927246 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Saner, J., Kool, J., Sieben, J. M., Luomajoki, H. A., Bastiaenen, C. H. G., & de Bie, R. A. (2015) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.math.2015.02.005 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationMatt, G. E. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/00723-3 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Larivière, C., Mecheri, H., Shahvarpour, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.03.002 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Ernst, M. J., Rast, F. M., Bauer, C. M., Marcar, V. L., & Kool, J. (2013) · BMC Research Notes · doi:10.1186/1756-0500-6-58 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationSchelldorfer, S., Ernst, M. J., Rast, F. M., Bauer, C. M., Meichtry, A., & Kool, J. (2014) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.09.004 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasurement of Postural Change in Trunk Movements Using Three Sensor Modules
Wong, W.-Y., & Wong, M. S. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2009.2016289 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Dideriksen, J. L., Gizzi, L., Petzke, F. W., & Falla, D. (2013) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2013.11.037 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Measuring Lumbar Reposition Accuracy in Patients With Unspecific Low Back Pain
Osthoff, A.-K. R., Ernst, M. J., Rast, F. M., Mauz, D., Graf, E. S., Kool, J., & Bauer, C. M. (2014) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0000000000000677 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationError analysis on spinal motion measurement using skin mounted sensors
Yang, Z., Ma, H. T., Wang, D., et al. (2008) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2008.4650272 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The use of splines to calculate jerk for a lifting task involving chronic lower back pain patients
Slaboda, J. C., Boston, J. R., Rudy, T. E., et al. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.844252 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Suni, J. H. (2014) · Journal of Novel Physiotherapies · doi:10.4172/2165-7025.1000194 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationReliability of a Measure of Total Lumbar Spine Range of Motion in Individuals with Low Back Pain
Zoubi, F. A., & Preuss, R. A. (2013) · Journal of Applied Biomechanics · doi:10.1123/jab.29.6.670 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Walter (1998) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980115)17:1
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Validity and Reliability of Wearable Sensors for Joint Angle Estimation: A Systematic Review
Poitras, I., Dupuis, F., Bielmann, M., Campeau-Lecours, A., Mercier, C., Bouyer, L., & Roy, J.-S. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19071555 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Bolink, S. A. A. N., Naisas, H., Senden, R., Essers, H., Heyligers, I. C., Meijer, K., & Grimm, B. (2016) · Medical Engineering & Physics · doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.11.009 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Use of wearable sensor technology in gait, balance, and range of motion analysis
Díaz, S., Stephenson, J. B., & Labrador, M. A. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10010234 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Bauer, C. M., Kankaanpää, M. J., Meichtry, A., Rissanen, S. M., & Suni, J. H. (2019) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.06.008 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bauer, C. M., Rast, F. M., Ernst, M. J., Kool, J., Oetiker, S., Rissanen, S. M., Suni, J. H., & Kankaanpää, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Tampere (FI)
- ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
- University of Eastern Finland (FI)
- Urho Kaleva Kekkonen Institute (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Bauer, C.M.
- Venue
- Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 782-790
- ISSN
- 1050-6411 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1810429939
- Semantic Scholar
- b0007d7290c12b3310ee9624540674eed70f87ac
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 5.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- ZHAW Digital Collection
- Funders
- Swiss Commission of Technical Innovation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- inertial measurement unit, trunk movement, concurrent validity, test-retest reliability, range of motion, repetitive movements, optical motion capture, generalizability theory
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Myography, Muscle, Skeletal, Wireless Technology, Torso
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review