Cited by 963Coagulation and Flocculation StudiesAdvanced oxidation water treatmentMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques

A comprehensive review of electrocoagulation for water treatment: Potentials and challenges

Moussa, Dina T., El-Naas, Muftah H., Nasser, Mustafa, Al-Marri, Mohammed J.·2017·Journal of Environmental Management

Abstract

Electrocoagulation is an effective electrochemical approach for the treatment of different types of contaminated water and has received considerable attention in recent years due its high efficiency in dealing with numerous stubborn pollutants. It has been successful in dealing with organic and inorganic contaminants with negligible or almost no generation of by-product wastes. During the past decade, vast amount of research has been devoted to utilizing electrocoagulation for the treatment of several types of wastewater, ranging from polluted groundwater to highly contaminated refinery wastewater. This paper offers a comprehensive review of recent literature that has been dedicated to utilizing electrocoagulation for water treatment, focusing on current successes on specific applications in water and wastewater treatment, as well as potentials for future applications. The paper examines such aspects as theory, potential applications, current challenges, recent developments as well as economical concerns associated with the technology. Most of the recent EC research has been focusing on pollutant-specific evaluation without paying attention to cell design, process modeling or industrial applications. This review attempts to highlight the main achievements in the area and outlines the major shortcomings with recommendations for promising research options that can enhance the technology and broaden its range of applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.032

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moussa, D. T., El-Naas, M. H., Nasser, M., & Al-Marri, M. J.
Affiliations
Qatar University (QA)
Venue
Journal of Environmental Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
186
Issue
Pt 1
Pages
24-41
ISSN
0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2549520433
Cited by
963
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 130 · 2021: 129 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 12
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Keywords
electrocoagulation, water treatment, wastewater treatment, groundwater treatment, refinery wastewater, organic pollutants, inorganic contaminants, electrochemical treatment, cell design, process modeling, economic feasibility
MeSH terms
Electrocoagulation, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Pollution, Water Purification, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review