The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: A Malthusian view
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the short-run and long-run effects of economic, sociological and energy factors on environmental degradation in 28 European countries. In so doing, we employ Panel Vector Autoregressive (PVAR) and Fully Modified OLS (FMOLS) approaches on data from 1990 to 2014 in a STIRPAT (Stochastic Impacts by Regression on Population, Affluence, and Technology) framework. Key empirical results indicate that these factors may contribute to environmental improvement in the short run; however, there are adverse implications in the long-run. Specifically, economic factors including economic growth, trade openness and foreign direct investment cause environmental degradation in the under-analysis economies. The sociological factors as measured by the population growth and the level of urbanization also show a negative impact on the environmental degradation in the short-run but in the long run, both population size and urbanization increase environmental degradation. These findings are in line with the concerns raised by Thomas Robert Malthus in his Essay on the Principle of Population. With regards to the energy factors, it indicates that the renewable energies help the European environment by reducing the level of carbon dioxide emissions whereas the higher energy intensity is an ecological threat. Our results remain robust in the EKC framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach
Kock, N. (2015) · International Journal of e-Collaboration · doi:10.4018/ijec.2015100101 · Cited by 10,215
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Djamba, Y. K., & Neuman, W. L. (2002) · Teaching Sociology · doi:10.2307/3211488 · Cited by 8,851
Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 · Cited by 8,550
Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement
Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3914 · Cited by 7,595
Thring, M. W. (1977) · Electronics and Power · doi:10.1049/ep.1977.0180 · Cited by 7,338
Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
Neuman, W. L. (1991) · Cited by 7,055
Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors
Pedroni, P. (1999) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14 · Cited by 6,726
Pedroni, P. (2004) · Econometric Theory · doi:10.1017/s0266466604203073 · Cited by 6,669
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Bargaoui, 2014, Environmental Impact determinants: an empirical analysis based on the STIRPAT model, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., 109, 449, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.489 · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.489
- Bucci, 2018, Dilution effects, population growth and economic growth under human capital accumulation and endogenous technological change, J. Macroecon.
- Chang, 2018, A sustainable metropolis: perspectives of population, productivity and parity, Sustainability, 10, 4264, 10.3390/su10114264 · doi:10.3390/su10114264
- Golley, 2015, Population dynamics and economic growth in China, China Econ. Rev., 35, 15, 10.1016/j.chieco.2015.05.005 · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2015.05.005
- Lapinskienė, 2015, Economic development and greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union countries, J. Bus. Econ. Manag., 16, 1109, 10.3846/16111699.2015.1112830 · doi:10.3846/16111699.2015.1112830
- Marsiglio, 2011, On the relationship between population change and sustainable development, Res. Econ., 65, 353, 10.1016/j.rie.2011.01.007 · doi:10.1016/j.rie.2011.01.007
- Rodriguez-Gonzalez, 2018, An integrated stochastic economic-ecological-social model with stratified-population, Ecol. Model., 368, 15, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.11.012 · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.11.012
Cited by
Chen, X. H., Tee, K., Elnahass, M., & Ahmed, R. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118525 · Cited by 407
Ilkay, S. C., Yilanci, V., Ulucak, R., & Jones, K. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113033 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Pham, N. M., Huynh, T. L. D., & Nasir, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 260
- Pages
- 110143
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3001118182
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 35.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- Funders
- University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: A Malthusian view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110143
- The paper
- Pham, N. M., Huynh, T. L. D., & Nasir, M. A. (2020). Environmental consequences of population, affluence and technological progress for European countries: A Malthusian view. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110143
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.