CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Bats, snakes and spiders, Oh my!” How aesthetic and negativistic attitudes, and other concepts predict support for species protection

Knight, Andrew J.·2008·Journal of Environmental Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Associated Press. (2004). Extinct list for species says Hawaii had the most. The New York Times, April 25, section 1, 30.
  2. Bjerke, 1999, The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large canivores, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 415, 10.1006/jevp.1999.0135 · DOI
  3. Bjerke, 2001, Sociodemographic correlates of fear-related attitudes toward the wolf (Canis lupus lupus). A survey in southeastern Norway, Fauna Norvegica, 21, 25, 10.5324/fn.v21i0.5995 · DOI
  4. Blocker, 1997, Gender and environmentalism: Results from the 1993 general social survey, Social Science Quarterly, 78, 841
  5. Brackney, 2001, Ecological worldviews and receptivity to different types of arguments for preserving endangered species, The Journal of Environmental Education, 33, 17, 10.1080/00958960109600797 · DOI
  6. Clayton, 2000, Models of justice in the environmental debate, Journal of Social Issues, 56, 469, 10.1111/0022-4537.00178 · DOI
  7. Czech, 1998, Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species, Conservation Biology, 12, 1103, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97253.x · DOI
  8. Dekay, 1996, Probability and utility components of endangered species preservation programs, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 60
  9. Dietz, 2002, Gender, values, and environmentalism, Social Science Quarterly, 83, 353, 10.1111/1540-6237.00088 · DOI
  10. Floyd, 1997, The relationship between environmental concern and acceptability of environmental impacts among visitors to two US national park settings, Journal of Environmental Management, 51, 391, 10.1006/jema.1997.0151 · DOI
  11. Freudenberg, 1998, Forty years of spotted owls? A longitudinal analysis of logging industry job losses, Sociological Perspectives, 41, 126
  12. Herzog, 2002, Preference and perceived danger in field/forest settings, Environment and Behavior, 34, 819, 10.1177/001391602237250 · DOI
  13. Herzog, 1998, The role of mystery in perceived danger and environmental preference, Environment and Behavior, 30, 429, 10.1177/001391659803000401 · DOI
  14. Herzog, 1988, Danger, mystery, and environmental preference, Environment and Behavior, 20, 320, 10.1177/0013916588203004 · DOI
  15. Jalonick, 2004, Critics cite other statistics, CQ Weekly, March 20, 685
  16. Kellert, 1985, Social and perceptual factors in endangered species management, Journal of Wildlife Management, 49, 528, 10.2307/3801568 · DOI
  17. Kellert, 1993, Values and perceptions of invertebrates, Conservation Biology, 7, 845, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.740845.x · DOI
  18. Kellert, 1996, Human culture and large carnivore conservation in North America, Conservation Biology, 10, 977, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10040977.x · DOI
  19. McCool, 1986, How the public perceives the visual effects of timber harvesting: An evaluation of interest group preferences, Environmental Management, 10, 385, 10.1007/BF01867264 · DOI
  20. Metrick, 1998, Conflicts and choices in biodiversity preservation, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 21, 10.1257/jep.12.3.21 · DOI
  21. Milne, 1995, Frequency of phobic disorder in a community sample of young adolescents, Journal of American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 1202, 10.1097/00004583-199509000-00018 · DOI
  22. Pooley, 2000, Environmental education and attitudes: Emotions and beliefs are what is needed, Environment and Behavior, 32, 711, 10.1177/0013916500325007 · DOI
  23. Skogen, 2001, Who's afraid of the big, bad wolf? Young people's responses to the conflicts over large carnivores in Eastern Norway, Rural Sociology, 66, 203, 10.1111/j.1549-0831.2001.tb00064.x · DOI
  24. Stern, 1995, The new ecological paradigm in social–psychological context, Environment and Behavior, 27, 723, 10.1177/0013916595276001 · DOI
  25. Summit, 1999, Further studies of preferred tree shapes, Environment and Behavior, 31, 550, 10.1177/00139169921972236 · DOI
  26. Tarrant, 1999, Outdoor recreation and the predictive validity of environmental attitudes, Leisure Sciences, 21, 17, 10.1080/014904099273264 · DOI
  27. Thomas, 2001, Habitat conservation planning: Certainly empowered, somewhat deliberative, questionably democratic, Politics and Society, 29, 105, 10.1177/0032329201029001005 · DOI
  28. Wilson, 1997, The wolf in Yellowstone: Science, symbol, or politics? Deconstructing the conflict between environmentalism and wise use, Society and Natural Resources, 10, 453, 10.1080/08941929709381044 · DOI
  29. Zinn, 1998, Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions, Society and Natural Resources, 11, 649, 10.1080/08941929809381109 · DOI
  30. Zinn, 2002, Values, gender, and concern about potentially dangerous wildlife, Environment and Behavior, 34, 239, 10.1177/0013916502034002005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Knight, A. J.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
94-103
ISSN
0272-4944
DOI
10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.10.001
Cited by
286
References
4
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review