The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antioxidant, antimicrobial, antiulcer and analgesic activities of nettle (Urtica dioica L.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Antioxidants and antioxidant methods: an updated overview
Gulcin, İ. (2020) · Archives of Toxicology · doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02689-3 · Cited by 2,205
The antioxidant and radical scavenging activities of black pepper (Piper nigrum) seeds
Gülçin, İ. (2005) · International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/09637480500450248 · Cited by 323
Mahendran, S., Maheswari, P., Sasikala, V., Rubika, J. J., & Pandiarajan, J. (2021) · Toxicology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.07.006 · Cited by 61
Antioxidant activity of flavonoid compounds isolated from the petals of Hibiscus rosa sinensis
Rengarajan, S., Melanathuru, V., Govindasamy, C., Chinnadurai, V., & Elsadek, M. F. (2020) · Journal of King Saud University - Science · doi:10.1016/j.jksus.2020.02.028 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Gülçin, İ., Küfrevioǧlu, Ö. İ., Oktay, M., & Büyükokuroǧlu, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 205-215
- ISSN
- 0378-8741 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104842126
- Cited by
- 852
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.