Cited by 149Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionSocial and Intergroup Psychology

When rejection by one fosters aggression against many: Multiple-victim aggression as a consequence of social rejection and perceived groupness

Open access
Gaertner, Lowell, Iuzzini, Jonathan, O’Mara, Erin M.·2008·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Abstract

Two experiments examined the hypothesis that social rejection and perceived groupness function together to produce multiple-victim incidents of aggression. When a rejecter's group membership is salient during an act of rejection, the rejectee ostensibly associates the rejecter's group with rejection and retaliates against the group. Both experiments manipulated whether an aggregate of three persons appeared as separate individuals or members of an entity-like group and whether one of those persons rejected the participant. Consistent with the hypothesis, participants who experienced both rejection and perceived groupness behaved more aggressively against the aggregate (Experiment 1) and evidenced less favorable affective associations toward the aggregate (Experiment 2) than did participants who did not experience both rejection and perceived groupness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.004

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of exclusion are more severe when exclusion is seen as perpetrated by a group rather than an individual, and especially when being excluded is attributed to one's group membership.

    “The effects of exclusion are more severe when exclusion is seen as perpetrated by a group rather than an individual, and especially when being excluded is attributed to one's group membership (van Beest, Carter-Sowell, van Dijk, & Williams, 2012;Gaertner, Iuzzini, & O'Mara, 2008;Goodwin, Williams, & Carter-Sowell, 2010;Wirth & Williams, 2009).”

    From Collective Narcissism: Political Consequences of Investing Self‐Worth in the Ingroup’s Image (2019) · cites this paper as Gaertner, Iuzzini, & O'Mara, 2008

    Experiment 1 (Discussion; page unavailable) reports greater aggression when one rejecter appeared to belong to an entity-like group, compared with rejection by one of three unaffiliated individuals; Experiment 2 reports less favorable associations with that group. The study does not establish that the rejection was perpetrated by a group, or that its effects were especially severe when participants attributed rejection to their own group membership. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Anderson CA Bushman BJ External validity of “trivial” experiments: The case of laboratory aggression Review of General Psychology 1997 1 19 41
  2. Anderson M Kaufman J Simon TR Barrios L Paulozzi L Ryan G School-associated violent deaths in the United States, 1994–1999 Journal of American Medical Association 2001 286 2695 2702 11730445
  3. Aronson E Carlsmith JM Aronson E Lindzey G Experiments in social psychology Handbook of Social Psychology 1968 2nd ed. Newton, MA Addison Wesley 1 79
  4. Baumeister RF Leary MR The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation Psychological Bulletin 1995 117 497 529 7777651
  5. Baumeister RF Twenge JM Nuss CK Effects of social exclusion on cognitive processes: Anticipated aloneness reduces intelligent thought Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002 83 817 827 12374437
  6. Brewer MB Harasty AS Sorrentino RM Higgins ET Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation Handbook of motivation and cognition: Vol. 3. The interpersonal context 1996 New York Guilford 347 370
  7. Bushman BJ Anderson CA Geen RG Donnerstein E Methodology in the study of aggression: Integrating experimental and nonexperimental findings Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy 1998 San Diego, CA Academic Press 23 48
  8. Clayton CJ Barlow SH Ballif-Spanvill B Hall HV Whitaker LC Principles of group violence with a focus on terrorism Collective violence: Effective strategies for assessing and interviewing in fatal group and institutional aggression 1999 Boca Raton CRC Press 276 311
  9. Coie J Dodge K Kupersmidt J Asher SR Coie JD Peer group behavior and social status Peer rejection in childhood 1990 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 17 59
  10. Crawford MT Sherman SJ Hamilton DL Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002 83 1076 1094 12416913
  11. Dasgupta N Banaji MR Abelson RP Group entitativity and group perception: Associations between physical features and psychological judgment Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999 5 991 1003 10573876
  12. DeRosier ME Kupersmidt JB Patterson CJ Children’s academic and behavioral adjustments as a function of the chronicity and proximity of peer rejection Child Development 1994 65 1799 1813 7859556
  13. Dijksterhuis A Van Knippenberg A Kruglanski AW Schaper C Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1996 32 254 270
  14. Dollard J Doob LW Miller NE Mowrer OH Sears RR Frustration and aggression 1939 New Haven, CT Yale University Press
  15. Gaertner L Iuzzini J Williams KD Forgas JP von Hippel W Rejection and entitativity: A synergistic model of mass violence The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying 2005 New York Psychology Press 307 320
  16. Gaertner L Iuzzini J Guerrero Witt M Oriña MM Us without them: Evidence for an intragroup origin of positive ingroup regard Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006 90 426 439 16594829
  17. Gaertner L Schopler J Perceived ingroup entitativity and intergroup bias: An interconnection of self and others European Journal of Social Psychology 1998 28 963 980
  18. Greenwald AG Nosek BA Banaji MR Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003 85 197 216 12916565
  19. Hamilton DL Sherman SJ Perceiving persons and groups Psychological Review 1996 103 336 355 8637962
  20. Hogg MA Burke PJ Social identity theory Contemporary social psychological theories 2006 Palo Alto, CA Stanford University Press 111 136
  21. Hogg MA Terry DJ White KM A tale of two theories: A critical comparison of identity theory with social identity theory Social Psychology Quarterly 1995 58 255 269
  22. Juvonen J Gross EF Williams KD Forgas JP von Hippel W The rejected and the bullied: Lessons about social misfits from developmental psychology The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying 2005 New York Psychology Press
  23. Kim BJ Song KJ Lee HK The effect of group entitativity on information processing of groups Korean Journal of Social and Personality Psychology 1997 11 57 73
  24. Kirkpatrick LA Waugh CE Valencia A Webster GD The functional domain-specificity of self-esteem and the differential prediction of aggression Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002 82 756 767 12003475
  25. Knowles ES Bassett RL Groups and crowds as social entities: Effects of activity, size, and member similarity on nonmembers Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976 34 837 845
  26. Lakin JL Chartrand TL Williams KD Forgas JP von Hippel W Exclusion and nonconscious behavioral mimicry The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying 2005 New York Psychology Press 279 295
  27. Leary MR Haupt AL Strausser KS Chokel JT Calibrating the sociometer: The relationship between interpersonal appraisals and the state self-esteem Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998 74 1290 1299 9599444
  28. Leary MR Tambor ES Terdal SK Downs DL Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995 68 518 530
  29. Leary MR Twenge JM Quinlivan E Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression Personality and Social Psychology Review 2006 10 111 132 16768650
  30. Lickel B Hamilton DL Sherman S Elements of a lay theory of groups: Types of groups, relationship styles, and the perception of group entitativity Personality and Social Psychology Review 2001 5 129 140
  31. Lickel B Hamilton DL Wieczorkowska G Lewis A Sherman S Uhles AN Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 2000 78 223 246 10707331
  32. Lickel B Schmader T Hamilton DL A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine High School shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003 29 194 204 15272947
  33. Mackie DM Devos T Smith ER Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2000 79 606 616 11045741
  34. Maner JK DeWall N Baumeister RF Schaller M Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “Porcupine Problem.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2007 92 42 55 17201541
  35. McConnell AR Sherman SJ Hamilton DL Target entitativity: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1997 72 750 762 9108693
  36. McConnell AR Leibold JM Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2001 37 435 442
  37. McGarty C Haslam SA Hutchinson KJ Grace DM Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories British Journal of Social Psychology 1995 34 237 256 7551771
  38. Moghaddam FM The staircase to terrorism: A psychological exploration American Psychologist 2005 60 161 169 15740448
  39. Newcomb AF Bukowski WM Pattee L Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status Psychological Bulletin 1993 113 99 128 8426876
  40. Pickett CL The effects of entitativity beliefs on implicit comparisons between group members Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2001 27 515 525
  41. Rydell RJ Hugenberg K Ray D Mackie DM Implicit theories about groups and stereotyping: The role of group entitativity Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007 33 549 558 17363758
  42. Smith ER Abrams D Hogg MA Affective and cognitive implications of a group becoming part of the self: New models of prejudice and of the self-concept Social identity and social cognition 1999 Oxford Basil Blackwell 183 196
  43. Turner JC Hogg MA Oakes PJ Reicher SD Wetherell MS Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory 1987 Oxford Basil Blackwell
  44. Twenge JM Baumeister RF Tice DM Stucke TS If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001 81 1058 1069 11761307
  45. Twenge JM Campbell WK “Isn’t it fun to get the respect that we’re going to deserve?”: Narcissism, social rejection, and aggression Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2003 29 261 272 15272953
  46. Williams KD Sommer KL Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1997 23 693 706
  47. Yzerbyt VY Rogier A Fiske ST Group entitativity and social attribution: On translating situational constraints into stereotypes Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1998 24 1089 1103

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaertner, L., Iuzzini, J., & O’Mara, E. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
  • Hobart and William Smith Colleges (US)
Corresponding author
Gaertner, Lowell
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-07
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
958-970
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094168143
Cited by
149
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R03MH068249)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
social rejection, group identity, retaliation, affective associations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review