Cited by 358Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and AggressionSocial and Intergroup Psychology

It’s the thought that counts: The role of hostile cognition in shaping aggressive responses to social exclusion

Open access
DeWall, C. Nathan, Twenge, Jean M., Gitter, Seth A., Baumeister, Roy F.·2009·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Prior research has confirmed a casual path between social rejection and aggression, but there has been no clear explanation of why social rejection causes aggression. A series of experiments tested the hypothesis that social exclusion increases the inclination to perceive neutral information as hostile, which has implications for aggression. Compared to accepted and control participants, socially excluded participants were more likely to rate aggressive and ambiguous words as similar (Experiment 1a), to complete word fragments with aggressive words (Experiment 1b), and to rate the ambiguous actions of another person as hostile (Experiments 2-4). This hostile cognitive bias among excluded people was related to their aggressive treatment of others who were not involved in the exclusion experience (Experiments 2 and 3) and others with whom participants had no previous contact (Experiment 4). These findings provide a first step in resolving the mystery of why social exclusion produces aggression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0013196

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults make less favorable appraisals of others following negative feedback.

    “Researchers have also found that adults make less favorable appraisals of others (5, 9, 10)”
  • Adults tend to rate accepting peers more favorably, respond to negative feedback by denigrating others, and engage in retaliatory impression updating, consistent with previous work.

    “The tendency for adults to rate accepting peers more favorably (36), respond to negative feedback by denigrating others (5, 9, 10), and engage in retaliatory impression updating (11) aligns with previous work.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baumeister RF Tice DM Anxiety and social exclusion Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1990 9 165 195
  2. Blackhart GC Knowles ML Bieda K A meta-analytic review of affective reactions and self-esteem in response to social rejection: Support for the need to belong and sociometer theories 2007 Manuscript submitted for publication
  3. McDougall P Hymel S Vaillancourt T Mercer L Leary MR The consequences of early childhood rejection Interpersonal rejection 2001 213 247 Oxford New York
  4. Wilson TD Gilbert DT Zanna M Affective forecasting Advances in experimental social psychology 2003 35 345 411 Elsevier New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeWall, C. N., Twenge, J. M., Gitter, S. A., & Baumeister, R. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2009-01
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
45-59
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2169993812
Cited by
358
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
28.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-65559)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
social exclusion, aggression, social rejection, hostile attribution
MeSH terms
Affect, Aggression, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Hostility, Humans, Male, Social Environment, Social Isolation, Social Perception, Students, Thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review