Cited by 38Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Managing terror when self-worth and worldviews collide: Evidence that mortality salience increases reluctance to self-enhance beyond authorities

Landau, Mark J., Greenberg, Jeff, Sullivan, Daniel·2009·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.007

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Landau, M. J., Greenberg, J., & Sullivan, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Landau, Mark J.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
68-79
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046492715
Cited by
38
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
terror management theory, mortality salience, self-enhancement, self-esteem, worldview defense, authority figures, political icon, self-presentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review