Cited by 102Stress Responses and CortisolSocial and Intergroup PsychologyAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Making support work: The interplay between social support and social identity

Frisch, Johanna U., Häusser, Jan A., van Dick, Rolf, Mojzisch, Andreas·2014·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.06.009

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frisch, J. U., Häusser, J. A., van Dick, R., & Mojzisch, A.
Affiliations
University of Hildesheim (DE)
Corresponding author
Frisch, Johanna U.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
55
Pages
154-161
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031099799
Cited by
102
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kultur
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
social support, social identity, stress buffering, shared identity, identity salience, Trier Social Stress Test, neuroendocrine stress response, cortisol, perceived social support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review