Cited by 22Food and Agricultural SciencesGenetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

Improvements to the International Life Sciences Institute Crop Composition Database

Alba, R., Phillips, A., Mackie, S., Gillikin, N., Maxwell, C., Brune, P., Ridley, W., Fitzpatrick, J., Levine, M., Harris, S.·2010·Journal of Food Composition and Analysis

Abstract

In May 2003, the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) released Version 1.0 of the Crop Composition Database (http://www.cropcomposition.org), a comprehensive public database that provides information on the natural variability in composition of conventionally bred crops. Currently, the database contains more than 115,000 data points representing 132 compositional components in corn, soybean and cotton. In 2009 the database logged more than 30,000 site visits from 122 countries around the world. ILSI has made a number of improvements to the original database and recently developed Version 4.0, which will be released for public access in 2010. Version 4.0 presents an intuitive graphical-user interface (GUI), significantly increased performance, added security, and additional features such as unit conversion and multiple output options. Another notable improvement in Version 4.0 is the Summary of Search Results tool, which allows users to immediately view data of interest and guides the preparation of output reports. This paper summarizes some of the enhanced features and usage of the database, which continues to be a valuable tool for characterizing the composition of conventional crops.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfca.2010.03.007

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alba, R., Phillips, A., Mackie, S., Gillikin, N., Maxwell, C., Brune, P., Ridley, W., Fitzpatrick, J., Levine, M., & Harris, S.
Affiliations
  • Monsanto (United States) (US)
  • Dow Agrosciences (United States) (US)
  • DuPont (United States) (US)
  • Syngenta (United States) (US)
  • International Life Sciences Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Harris, S.
Venue
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
741-748
ISSN
0889-1575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106284439
Cited by
22
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
crop composition, natural variation, maize, soybean, cotton, graphical user interface, unit conversion, food composition data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review