The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular toxicity mechanism of nanosilver
Open accessAbstract
Silver is an ancient antibiotic that has found many new uses due to its unique properties on the nanoscale. Due to its presence in many consumer products, the toxicity of nanosilver has become a hot topic. This review summarizes recent advances, particularly the molecular mechanism of nanosilver toxicity. The surface of nanosilver can easily be oxidized by O(2) and other molecules in the environmental and biological systems leading to the release of Ag(+), a known toxic ion. Therefore, nanosilver toxicity is closely related to the release of Ag(+). In fact, it is difficult to determine what portion of the toxicity is from the nano-form and what is from the ionic form. The surface oxidation rate is closely related to the nanosilver surface coating, coexisting molecules, especially thiol-containing compounds, lighting conditions, and the interaction of nanosilver with nucleic acids, lipid molecules, and proteins in a biological system. Nanosilver has been shown to penetrate the cell and become internalized. Thus, nanosilver often acts as a source of Ag(+) inside the cell. One of the main mechanisms of toxicity is that it causes oxidative stress through the generation of reactive oxygen species and causes damage to cellular components including DNA damage, activation of antioxidant enzymes, depletion of antioxidant molecules (e.g., glutathione), binding and disabling of proteins, and damage to the cell membrane. Several major questions remain to be answered: (1) the toxic contribution from the ionic form versus the nano-form; (2) key enzymes and signaling pathways responsible for the toxicity; and (3) effect of coexisting molecules on the toxicity and its relationship to surface coating.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Time Evolution of the Nanoparticle Protein Corona
Casals, E., Pfaller, T., Duschl, A., Oostingh, G. J., & Puntes, V. (2010) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn901372t · Cited by 1,211
Cited by
Heavy Metal Pollution in the Environment and Their Toxicological Effects on Humans
Briffa, J., Sinagra, E., & Blundell, R. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691 · Cited by 4,402
A review on detection of heavy metal ions in water—An electrochemical approach
Gumpu, M. B., Sethuraman, S., Krishnan, U. M., & Rayappan, J. B. B. (2015) · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · doi:10.1016/j.snb.2015.02.122 · Cited by 1,027
Choi, S., Han, S. I., Jung, D., Hwang, H. J., Lim, C., Bae, S., Park, O. K., Tschabrunn, C. M., Lee, M., Bae, S. Y., et al. (2018) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0226-8 · Cited by 984
The current application of nanotechnology in food and agriculture
He, X., Deng, H., & Hwang, H.-M. (2019) · Journal of Food and Drug Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfda.2018.12.002 · Cited by 959
Nanotechnology in food science: Functionality, applicability, and safety assessment
He, X., & Hwang, H.-M. (2016) · Journal of Food and Drug Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.001 · Cited by 474
Metadata
- Authors
- McShan, D., Ray, P. C., & Yu, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Food and Drug Analysis
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 116-127
- ISSN
- 1021-9498 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2172101363
- Cited by
- 762
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular toxicity mechanism of nanosilver. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.010
- The paper
- McShan, D., Ray, P. C., & Yu, H. (2014). Molecular toxicity mechanism of nanosilver. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2014.01.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.