CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 193Stuttering Research and TreatmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCommunication in Education and Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The relationship between anxiety and stuttering: a multidimensional approach

Ezrati-Vinacour, Ruth, Levin, Iris·2004·Journal of Fluency Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.02.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unlabelled The relationship between anxiety and stuttering is equivocal from both clinical and empirical perspectives. This study examined the relationship within the framework of the multidimensional interaction model of anxiety that includes an approach to general anxiety in specific situations [J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 60 (1991) 919]. Ninety-four males aged 18-43, half disfluent speakers and half fluent speakers completed two questionnaires: The Trait Anxiety Inventory [C.D. Spielberger, R.L. Gorsuch, R.E. Lushene, Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Self Evaluation Questionnaire), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA, 1970] and the Speech Situation Checklist [G.J. Brutten, Neurolinguistic Approaches to Stuttering, Mouton, The Hague; G.J. Brutten, Stuttering: A Second Symposium, Harper and Row, New York, 1973; G.J. Brutten, P. Janssen, Proceedings 18th Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrists, Washington, DC, 1975; M. Vanryckeghem, Proceedings of the XXIVth Congress of the International Association of Logopedists and Phoniatrists, Nijmegen University Press, Nijmegen, 1981]. In addition, after performing speech and non-speech tasks, participants evaluated their level of anxiety on a subjective scale, labeled Task-Related Anxiety--TRA. The stuttering group also evaluated the level of severity of their stuttering. Findings indicate that trait anxiety is higher among people who stutter compared to fluent speakers, thus indicating that anxiety is a personality trait of people who stutter. State anxiety in social communication is higher among severe stutterers as compared to mild stutterers and fluent speakers. Thus, state anxiety is related to stuttering severity. The results are discussed in the frame of the multidimensional model of anxiety.Educational objectives The reader will be able to: (1) describe the multidimensional anxiety model; (2) extend the model to the relations between stuttering and anxiety; (3) describe stuttering severity in relation to the levels of anxiety within the model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.02.003

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bloodstein, O. (1995). A handbook on stuttering (5th ed.). California: Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
  2. Boland, 1953, A comparison of stutterers and nonstutterers on several measures of anxiety, Speech Monographs, 20, 144
  3. Brutten, E. J., & Janssen, P. (1981). A normative and factor analysis study of the responses of Dutch and American stutterers to Speech Situation Checklist. Proceedings of the 18th Congress of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrists, Washington, DC.
  4. Campbell, J. H., & Hill, D. G. (1991). Systematic disfluency analysis. In H. Gregory (Ed.), Stuttering therapy—A workshop for specialists. Illinois: Northwestern University & the Speech Foundation of America.
  5. Dahlstrom, 1952, The MMPI and stuttering phenomena in young adults, The American Psychologist, 7, 341
  6. Gregory, H. (1991). Stuttering therapy: Workshop for specialists. Northwestern University: The Speech Foundation of America.
  7. Janssen, 1980, Disfluency and anxiety in stuttering and non-stuttering adolescents, Behavioral Analysis and Modification, 4, 116
  8. Pizzat, 1951, A personality study of college stutterers, Speech Monograph, 18, 240
  9. Vanryckeghem, M. (1999). The Behavior Assessment Battery: An update. Proceedings of the XXIVth Congress of the International Association of Logopedists and Phoniatrists. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 193

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ezrati-Vinacour, R., & Levin, I.
Affiliations
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Ezrati-Vinacour, Ruth
ORCID
Levin, Iris
Venue
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
135-148
ISSN
0094-730X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.02.003
OpenAlex
W2027429995
Cited by
193
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Fluency Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
stuttering, anxiety, trait anxiety, state anxiety, stuttering severity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Speech Production Measurement, Stuttering, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review