CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 175Stuttering Research and TreatmentPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A phenomenological understanding of successful stuttering management

Plexico, Laura, Manning, Walter H., DiLollo, Anthony·2005·Journal of Fluency Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.12.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unlabelled The purpose of this investigation was to understand, from the perspective of the speaker, how seven adults have been able to successfully manage their stuttering. Individual experiences were obtained across the three temporal stages (past, transitional, and current). Recurring themes were identified across participants in order to develop an essential structure of the phenomena at each stage. The ability to make the transition from unsuccessful to successful management of stuttering was associated with six recurring themes of: (1) support, (2) successful therapy, (3) self therapy and behavioral change, (4) cognitive change, (5) utilization of personal experience, and (6) high levels of motivation/determination. Six recurring themes associated with past experiences, when stuttering was unsuccessfully managed, included: (1) gradual awareness, (2) negative reactions of listeners, (3) negative emotions, (4) restrictive lifestyle, (5) avoidance, and (6) inadequate therapy. The five recurring themes identified for the current situation where stuttering continues to be successfully managed were: (1) continued management, (2) self acceptance and fear reduction, (3) unrestricted interactions, (4) sense of freedom, (5) and optimism.Educational objectives The reader will be able to: (1) describe, from the prospective of a select group of adults who stutter, the recurring themes associated with both unsuccessful and successful management of stuttering, (2) explain the recurring themes associated with how this group of seven adults achieved successful management of their stuttering, and (3) discuss the basic rationale and procedures associated with phenomenological analysis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.12.001

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 175

Related

Metadata

Authors
Plexico, L., Manning, W. H., & DiLollo, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Memphis (US)
  • Wichita State University (US)
Corresponding author
Plexico, Laura
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
1-22
ISSN
0094-730X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jfludis.2004.12.001
OpenAlex
W1998384065
Cited by
175
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Fluency Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
stuttering, stuttering treatment, adults who stutter, self-therapy, behavior change, cognitive change, motivation, support, avoidance, self-acceptance, fear reduction, phenomenological analysis, lived experience
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Social Support, Speech Therapy, Stuttering, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review