Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch translation of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for adults (OASES-A-D)
Open accessAbstract
Unlabelled The Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for adults (OASES-A; Yaruss & Quesal, 2006, 2010) is a patient-reported outcome measure that was designed to provide a comprehensive assessment of "the experience of the stuttering disorder from the perspective of individuals who stutter" (Yaruss & Quesal, 2006, p. 90). This paper reports on the translation process and evaluates the psychometric performance of a Dutch version of the OASES-A. Translation of the OASES-A into Dutch followed a standard forward and backward translation process. The Dutch OASES-A (OASES-A-D) was then administered to 138 adults who stutter. A subset of 91 respondents also evaluated their speech on a 10-point Likert scale. For another subset of 45 respondents, a clinician-based stuttering severity rating on a 5-point Likert scale was available. Thirty-two of the respondents also completed the Dutch S-24 scale (Brutten & Vanryckeghem, 2003). The OASES-A-D showed acceptable item properties. No ceiling effects were observed. For 30 out of 100 items, most of which were in Section IV (Quality of Life), floor effects were observed. Cronbach's α coefficients for all sections and subsections surpassed the 0.70 criterion of good internal consistency and reliability. Concurrent validity was moderate to high. Construct validity was confirmed by distinct scores on the OASES-A-D for groups with different levels of stuttering severity as rated by the speakers themselves or by clinicians. These results suggest that the OASES-A-D is a reliable and valid measure that can be used to assess the impact of stuttering on Dutch adults who stutter. Educational objectives The reader will be able to: (a) describe the purpose of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for adults (OASES-A) measurement tool; (b) summarize the translation process used in creating the Dutch version of the OASES-A (OASES-A-D); (c) evaluate the psychometric properties of the OASES-A-D; and (d) compare the psychometric properties of the OASES-A-D with those of the original American English OASES-A.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As the child gets older, adverse impact is not determined by overt speech disruptions.
“That is, as the child gets older, adverse impact is not determined by overt speech disruptions.38,41,42”
From Psychosocial Impact of Living with a Stuttering Disorder: Knowing Is Not Enough. (2014) · cites this paper as [42]
Cites
Yaruss, J. S., & Quesal, R. W. (2006) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2006.02.002 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
Self-citationBricker-Katz, G., Lincoln, M., & McCabe, P. (2009) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280902738672 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Adults Who Stutter: Psychosocial Adjustment and Speech Fluency
Beilby, J. M., Byrnes, M. L., & Yaruss, J. S. (2012) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2012.05.003 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Quality of Life in Adults Who Stutter
Koedoot, C., Bouwmans, C., Franken, M.-C., & Stolk, E. (2011) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.02.002 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationPsychosocial Impact of Living with a Stuttering Disorder: Knowing Is Not Enough.
Beilby, J. (2014) · Seminars in Speech and Language · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1371756 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
The Impact of a Stuttering Disorder on Western Australian Children and Adolescents
Beilby, J. M., Byrnes, M. L., & Yaruss, J. S. (2012) · Perspectives on Fluency and Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1044/ffd22.2.51 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationAustralian Normative Data for the Overall Assessment of the Speaker’s Experience of Stuttering
Blumgart, E., Tran, Y., Scott Yaruss, J., & Craig, A. (2012) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2011.12.002 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Freud, D., Kichin-Brin, M., Ezrati-Vinacour, R., Roziner, I., & Amir, O. (2017) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.03.008 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Koedoot, C., Versteegh, M., & Yaruss, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Fluency Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 222-230
- ISSN
- 0094-730X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134273323
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Fluency Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- stuttering, Dutch translation, patient-reported outcome measures, psychometric properties, cross-cultural adaptation, stuttering severity, quality of life, floor effect, internal consistency, concurrent validity, construct validity
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stuttering, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review