Cited by 127Stuttering Research and TreatmentVoice and Speech DisordersObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders

Quality of Life in Adults Who Stutter

Koedoot, Caroline, Bouwmans, Clazien, Franken, Marie-Christine, Stolk, Elly·2011·Journal of Communication Disorders

Abstract

Although persistent developmental stuttering is known to affect daily living, just how great the impact is remains unclear. Furthermore, little is known about the underlying mechanisms which lead to a diminished quality of life (QoL). The primary objective of this study is to explore to what extent QoL is impaired in adults who stutter (AWS). In addition, this study aims to identify determinants of QoL in AWS by testing relationships between stuttering severity, coping, functioning and QoL and by testing for differences in variable scores between two AWS subgroups: receiving therapy versus not receiving therapy. A total of 91 AWS filled in several questionnaires to assess their stuttering severity, daily functioning, coping style and QoL. The QoL instruments used were the Health Utility Index 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQoL EQ-5D and EQ-VAS. The results indicated that moderate to severe stuttering has a negative impact on overall quality of life; HUI3 derived QoL values varied from .91 (for mild stuttering) to .73 (for severe stuttering). The domains of functioning that were predominantly affected were the individual's speech, emotion, cognition and pain as measured by the HUI3 and daily activities and anxiety/depression as measured by the EQ-5D. AWS in the therapy group rated their stuttering as more severe and recorded more problems on the HUI3 speech domain than AWS in the non-therapy group. The EQ-VAS was the only instrument that showed a significant difference in overall QoL between groups. Finally, it was found that the relationship between stuttering severity and QoL was influenced by the individual's coping style (emotion-oriented and task-oriented). These findings highlight the need for further research into stuttering in relation to QoL, and for a broader perspective on the diagnosis and treatment of stuttering, which would take into consideration quality of life and its determinants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.02.002

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koedoot, C., Bouwmans, C., Franken, M.-C., & Stolk, E.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Journal of Communication Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
429-443
ISSN
0021-9924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021694086
Cited by
127
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Keywords
adults who stutter, quality of life, stuttering severity, coping styles, emotion-focused coping, task-oriented coping, speech therapy, EQ-5D, EQ-VAS, daily functioning, anxiety and depression, pain, emotions, cognition, Wilson and Cleary model, health-related quality of life
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Stuttering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review