CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,536Arsenic contamination and mitigationAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 568 of the 568 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review

Mohan, Dinesh, Pittman, Charles U.·2007·Journal of Hazardous Materials
DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Arsenic's history in science, medicine and technology has been overshadowed by its notoriety as a poison in homicides. Arsenic is viewed as being synonymous with toxicity. Dangerous arsenic concentrations in natural waters is now a worldwide problem and often referred to as a 20th-21st century calamity. High arsenic concentrations have been reported recently from the USA, China, Chile, Bangladesh, Taiwan, Mexico, Argentina, Poland, Canada, Hungary, Japan and India. Among 21 countries in different parts of the world affected by groundwater arsenic contamination, the largest population at risk is in Bangladesh followed by West Bengal in India. Existing overviews of arsenic removal include technologies that have traditionally been used (oxidation, precipitation/coagulation/membrane separation) with far less attention paid to adsorption. No previous review is available where readers can get an overview of the sorption capacities of both available and developed sorbents used for arsenic remediation together with the traditional remediation methods. We have incorporated most of the valuable available literature on arsenic remediation by adsorption ( approximately 600 references). Existing purification methods for drinking water; wastewater; industrial effluents, and technological solutions for arsenic have been listed. Arsenic sorption by commercially available carbons and other low-cost adsorbents are surveyed and critically reviewed and their sorption efficiencies are compared. Arsenic adsorption behavior in presence of other impurities has been discussed. Some commercially available adsorbents are also surveyed. An extensive table summarizes the sorption capacities of various adsorbents. Some low-cost adsorbents are superior including treated slags, carbons developed from agricultural waste (char carbons and coconut husk carbons), biosorbents (immobilized biomass, orange juice residue), goethite and some commercial adsorbents, which include resins, gels, silica, treated silica tested for arsenic removal come out to be superior. Immobilized biomass adsorbents offered outstanding performances. Desorption of arsenic followed by regeneration of sorbents has been discussed. Strong acids and bases seem to be the best desorbing agents to produce arsenic concentrates. Arsenic concentrate treatment and disposal obtained is briefly addressed. This issue is very important but much less discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006

Cites

568 of 568 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Items 201–400 of 568

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. P.L. Smedley, D.G. Kinniburgh, Sources and behaviour of arsenic in natural water, Chapter 1 in United Nations Synthesis Report on Arsenic in Drinking Water, 2005.
  2. Gupta, 1978, Arsenic removal by adsorption, J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., 50, 493
  3. Jekel, 1994, Removal of arsenic in drinking water treatment, vol. 26, 119
  4. Viraraghavan, 1994, Environ. Syst. Rev., 37, 1
  5. Jeckel, 2000, Comparison of conventional and new techniques for the removal of arsenic in a full scale water treatment plant, Int. Water Assoc., 18, 628
  6. Bates, 1998, Technologies for the removal of arsenic from drinking water in New Mexico, New Mexico J. Sci., 38, 332
  7. Peter, 2005, Ion exchange. An overview of technologies useful for arsenic removal, Ultrapure Water, 22, 42
  8. 2000, vol. 27
  9. Rajakovic, 1992, Sorption of arsenic onto activated carbon impregnated with metallic silver and copper, Sep. Sci. Technol., 27, 1423, 10.1080/01496399208019434 · DOI
  10. Huang, 1984, Treatment of As(V) containing water by activated carbon, J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed., 56, 232
  11. Raji, 1999, Sorption of As(III) on surface modified sawdust carbon, Indian J. Environ. Health, 41, 184
  12. Ernesto, 1987, Adsorption of arsenic on activated charcoal, J. Metals, 39, 38
  13. Peraniemi, 1994, Zirconium-loaded activated charcoal as an adsorbent for arsenic, selenium and mercury, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 349, 510
  14. Prasad, 1994, Removal of As(V) from aqueous systems by adsorption onto geological materials, vol. 26, 119
  15. Gillman, 2006, A simple technology for arsenic removal from drinking water using hydrotalcite, Sci. Total Environ., 366, 926, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.036 · DOI
  16. Dyer, 1988, vol. 5–8
  17. Norton, 2001, Throw-away iron and aluminum sorbents versus conventional activated alumina for arsenic removal—pilot testing results, Am. Water Works Assoc., 2073
  18. Saxena, 2005, Reducing arsenic concentration in groundwater, Curr. Sci., 88, 707
  19. Stamer, 2000, The removal of arsenic: arsenic removal without sludge generation, Water Supply, 118, 625
  20. Mann, 1999, Studies on removal of arsenic from water using hydrated zirconium oxide, Chem. Environ. Res., 8, 51
  21. Haron, 1997, Removal of arsenic(V) by cerium(III) complexed chelating ion exchanger, Malys. J. Anal. Sci., 3, 193
  22. Dambies, 2000, As(V) sorption on molybdate-impregnated chitosan gel beads (MICB), Adv. Chitin Sci., 4, 302
  23. Say, 2003, Biosorption of cadmium, lead, mercury, and arsenic ions by fungus Penicillium Purpurogenum, Sep. Sci. Technol., 38, 2039, 10.1081/SS-120020133 · DOI
  24. Cunningham, 1997, 1997, 2
  25. California Code Title 22, Article 11, pp. 1800.75–1800.82.
  26. Pakholkov, 1980, Sorption of As(III) and As(V) ions from aqueous solution by hydroxides and inorganic ion exchanger, Zh. Prikl. Khim. Leningrad, 53, 280
  27. D.G. Kinniburgh, P.L. Smedley (Eds.), Arsenic Contamination of Ground Water in Bangladesh, vol. 2, Final Report (BGS Technical Report WC/00/19, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, UK, 2001).
  28. Ahmed, 2006, Ensuring Safe Drink. Water Bangladesh, 314, 1687
  29. C. Fiorentino, M. Sequeira, D. Paoloni, N. Echeverría, Detección y distribución de arsénico, flúor y boro en aguas subterráneas regionales, Mapas de Riesgo, Congreso Nacional del Agua, Actas: 1998, Santa Fe, Argentina, pp. 71–79 (in Spanish).
  30. Arsenic mitigation and health effects in Bangladesh: epidemiological observations, in: M. Rahman, O. Axelson, W.R. Chappell, C.O. Abernathy, R.L. Calderon (Eds.), Arsenic Exposure and Health Effects IV: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Arsenic Exposure and Health Effects, San Diego, CA, June 18–22, 2000, Elsevier, pp. 193–199.
  31. Agusa, 2002, Arsenic pollution in Cambodia, Biomed. Res. Trace Elements, 13, 254
  32. Sancha, 2000, Removal of arsenic from drinking water supplies: Chilean experience, Int. Water Assoc., 18, 621
  33. Mandal, 1996, Arsenic in groundwater in seven districts of West Bengal, India—the biggest arsenic calamity in the world, Curr. Sci., 70, 976
  34. Roychowdhury, 1999, Arsenic poisoning in Ganges delta, Nature, 401, 545, 10.1038/44056 · DOI
  35. Simenova, 2000, Pilot study for arsenic removal, IWA, 440
  36. F.N. Robertson, Occurrence and solubility controls of trace elements in groundwater in alluvial basins of Arizona, in: I.W. Anderson, A.I. Johnson (Eds.), Regional Aquifer Systems of United States, Southwest Alluvial Basins of ArizonaAmerican Water Resources Association Monograph, Series 7, 1986, pp. 69–80.
  37. Nenov, 1986, Ion exchange resins of increased selectivity towards arsenic, Environ. Prot. Eng., 12, 79
  38. Pan, 2003, Removal of arsenic from contaminated water by foam flotation, Eur. J. Miner. Process. Environ. Protect., 3, 243
  39. Borgono, 1971, Epidemiological study of arsenicism in the city of Autofagasta, Trace Subs. Environ. Health, 5, 13
  40. Chanda, 1994, Analyst, 119, 168N, 10.1039/an994190168n · DOI
  41. Das, 1983, Arsenic metabolism and toxicity to freshwater and marine species, vol. 6, 155
  42. Ghosh, 1978, Adsorption of arsenic and organoarsenicals on hydrous oxides, Environ. Prog., 6, 150, 10.1002/ep.670060325 · DOI
  43. Jegadeesan, 2005, Arsenate remediation using nanosized modified zerovalent iron particles, Environ. Prog., 24, 289, 10.1002/ep.10072 · DOI
  44. Kaneko, 1979, Arsenic concentration in groundwaters in Sendai City, Chikyu Kagaku, 13, 1
  45. Wickramasinghe, 2004, Arsenic removal by coagulation and filtration: comparison of ground waters from united states and Bangladesh, Desalination, 169, 231, 10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00530-2 · DOI
  46. Hodi, 1995, Removal of poolutants for drinking water by combined ion-exchange and adsorption methods, Environ. Int., 21, 325, 10.1016/0160-4120(95)00019-H · DOI
  47. Genc, 2003, Adsorption of arsenate from water using neutralized red mud, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 264, 327, 10.1016/S0021-9797(03)00447-8 · DOI
  48. Amin, 2006, Renoval of arsenic in aqueous solutions by adsorption onto waste rice husk, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (ACS), 45, 8105, 10.1021/ie060344j · DOI
  49. 1994, vol. 26
  50. G. Amy, H.-W. Chen, A. Drizo, U. von Gunten, P. Brandhuber, R. Hund, Z. Chowhury, S. Kommeni, S. Sinha, M. Jekel, K. Banerjee, Adsorbent Treatment Technologies for Arsenic Removal, American Water Works Association, Edition: 2005, ISBN 1583213996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,536

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mohan, D., & Pittman, C. U.
Affiliations
  • Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (IN)
  • Mississippi State University (US)
Corresponding author
Mohan, Dinesh
ORCID
Mohan, Dinesh
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
142
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-53
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.006
OpenAlex
W2125266999
Semantic Scholar
bdcf8dee5ba5ba0ad20f2eb719934a0e7d29837d
Cited by
3,536
References
568
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 116 · 2024: 152 · 2023: 165 · 2022: 204 · 2021: 231 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 259 · 2018: 222 · 2017: 257 · 2016: 257 · 2015: 251 · 2014: 239 · 2013: 227 · 2012: 187
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
arsenic removal, adsorption, sorption capacity, low-cost adsorbent, biosorbent, immobilized biomass, goethite, silica adsorbent, desorption, adsorbent regeneration, groundwater arsenic contamination, drinking water treatment, wastewater treatment, industrial wastewater
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Arsenic, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Environmental Restoration and Remediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review