Cited by 1Recycling and Waste Management TechniquesSustainable Supply Chain ManagementMunicipal Solid Waste Management

How long do consumer electronics last in Canada?

Open access
Mohammadi, Elham, Habib, Komal·2026·Journal of Cleaner Production

Abstract

Rapid growth in global electronic waste generation has emerged as a critical global challenge with far-reaching environmental and public-health implications. Understanding consumer behaviours that influence the purchase, use, and disposal of electronic products is essential in addressing this issue. In Canada, consumer behaviour surrounding the use, replacement, and end-of-life management of electronic products remains insufficiently explored. This study addresses this gap, focusing on seven product categories: mobile phones, laptops/tablets, desktop computers, televisions, refrigerators, microwaves, and laundry appliances. Data are collected from 800 households across 9 provinces in Canada to capture their purchase, use, and disposal patterns. The Weibull distribution model is applied to analyze dynamic lifetimes and estimate the flow of end-of-life products. The findings indicate that phones have the shortest average lifetime, at approximately 4.5 years, whereas laundry appliances have the longest, at around 9.7 years. Among the seven product categories, phones (β = 1.68) exhibit the strongest aging or obsolescence effect, indicating a faster increase in replacement risk over time. The analysis shows that approximately 72% of the products are acquired brand-new, and 65% are replaced for reasons other than complete functional failure. Across the seven categories, around 2.3 million tonnes of e-waste are estimated to be generated from 2025 to 2030. The results reveal substantial unrealized potential to reduce e-waste in Canada and point to opportunities to advance circular-economy outcomes through interventions such as repair and maintenance incentives, greater availability and acceptance of refurbished and second-hand products, standardized labeling, as well as targeted consumer-awareness initiatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.147773

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Echegaray, 2017, Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: the case of Brazil, J. Clean. Prod., 142, 180, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.064 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Fillman, 2023, Comprehensive right to repair: the fight against planned obsolescence in Canada, Dalhous. J. Leg. Stud., 32, 123
  3. 2024, Right to repair consultation document, Innov. Sci. Econ. Develop. Canada
  4. Moala, 2014, Bayesian estimation of reliability of the electronic components using censored data from weibull distribution: different prior distributions, Int. J. Industrial Eng. Prod. Res., 25, 257

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Mohammadi, E., & Habib, K.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Mohammadi, Elham
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-03
Volume
547
Pages
147773
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7130882323
Cited by
1
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
Keywords
electronic waste, consumer electronics, product lifetime, end-of-life management, consumer behavior, Weibull distribution, product substitution, obsolescence, circular economy, refurbished products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review