Cited by 92

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drug induced liver injury and its relationship to autoimmune hepatitis

Weiler-Normann, Christina, Schramm, Christoph·2011·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

Recurrent Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) with different drugs in the Spanish Registry: The dilemma of the relationship to autoimmune hepatitisJournal of HepatologyVol. 55Issue 4PreviewMultiple instances of DILI in the same patient with drugs of similar structure or function as well as completely unrelated drugs are not well understood and poorly documented. We have sought evidence of the frequency and characteristics of patients who have experienced two DILI episodes due to different drugs. Full-Text PDF Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of acute liver failure [[1]Chalasani N. Fontana R.J. Bonkovsky H.L. Watkins P.B. Davern T. Serrano J. et al.Causes, clinical features, and outcomes from a prospective study of drug-induced liver injury in the United States.Gastroenterology. 2008; 135 (e1921–1924): 1924-1934Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (661) Google Scholar] and is of major importance to the pharmaceutical industry, as it is the most frequent reason for withdrawal of substances from the market. More than 1000 different drugs and herbal remedies have been described to cause DILI. Some drugs cause a dose-dependent toxicity which can be anticipated – a well known example is acetaminophen. The vast majority of DILI cases cannot be foreseen and are, therefore, termed idiosyncratic. Oxidative stress, reactive metabolites, mitochondrial toxicity, modulation of drug metabolizing transporters, induction of apoptosis or necrosis, as well as immunoall…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.02.024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Chalasani, 2008, Causes, clinical features, and outcomes from a prospective study of drug-induced liver injury in the United States, Gastroenterology, 135, 1924, 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.011 · DOI · Paper page
  2. El-Serag, 2002, Diabetes increases the risk of acute hepatic failure, Gastroenterology, 122, 1822, 10.1053/gast.2002.33650 · DOI
  3. Bjornsson, 2009, The long-term follow-up after idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury with jaundice, J Hepatol, 50, 511, 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.021 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bjornsson, 2010, Review article: drug-induced liver injury in clinical practice, Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 32, 3, 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04320.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Lammert, 2010, Oral medications with significant hepatic metabolism at higher risk for hepatic adverse events, Hepatology, 51, 615, 10.1002/hep.23317 · DOI
  6. Boelsterli, 2007, Mitochondrial abnormalities – a link to idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity?, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 220, 92, 10.1016/j.taap.2006.12.013 · DOI
  7. Lucena, 2008, Glutathione S-transferase m1 and t1 null genotypes increase susceptibility to idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury, Hepatology, 48, 588, 10.1002/hep.22370 · DOI
  8. Hunt, 2010, Mitochondrial and immunoallergic injury increase risk of positive drug rechallenge after drug-induced liver injury: a systematic review, Hepatology, 52, 2216, 10.1002/hep.24022 · DOI
  9. Sharma, 2010, Safety of 3 different reintroduction regimens of antituberculosis drugs after development of antituberculosis treatment-induced hepatotoxicity, Clin Infect Dis, 50, 833, 10.1086/650576 · DOI
  10. Lucena, 2011, Recurrent drug-induced liver injury (DILI) with different drugs in the Spanish registry, The dilemma of the relationship to autoimmune hepatitis. J Hepatol, 55, 70
  11. Alvarez, 1999, International autoimmune hepatitis group report: review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, J Hepatol, 31, 929, 10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80297-9 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hennes, 2008, Simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, Hepatology, 48, 169, 10.1002/hep.22322 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Manns, 2010, Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis, Hepatology, 51, 2193, 10.1002/hep.23584 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Bjornsson, 2010, Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis: clinical characteristics and prognosis, Hepatology, 51, 2040, 10.1002/hep.23588 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Bernal, 2007, The significance of autoantibodies and immunoglobulins in acute liver failure: a cohort study, J Hepatol, 47, 664, 10.1016/j.jhep.2007.05.011 · DOI
  16. Efe, 2010, Drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis caused by anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents, Hepatology, 52, 2246, 10.1002/hep.23834 · DOI
  17. von Kalckreuth, 2008, Unmasking autoimmune Hepatitis under immunomodulatory treatment of multiple sclerosis – not only beta interferon, Am J Gastroenterol, 103, 2147, 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.01982_9.x · DOI
  18. Donaldson, 2010, Human leucocyte antigen class II genotype in susceptibility and resistance to co-amoxiclav-induced liver injury, J Hepatol, 53, 1049, 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.05.033 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weiler-Normann, C., & Schramm, C.
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
747-749
ISSN
0168-8278
Cited by
92
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review