Cited by 1,278Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and ProtectionLiver Diseases and ImmunityPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 366 of the 371 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury

Abstract

Idiosyncratic (unpredictable) drug-induced liver injury is one of the most challenging liver disorders faced by hepatologists, because of the myriad of drugs used in clinical practice, available herbs and dietary supplements with hepatotoxic potential, the ability of the condition to present with a variety of clinical and pathological phenotypes and the current absence of specific biomarkers. This makes the diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury an uncertain process, requiring a high degree of awareness of the condition and the careful exclusion of alternative aetiologies of liver disease. Idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity can be severe, leading to a particularly serious variety of acute liver failure for which no effective therapy has yet been developed. These Clinical Practice Guidelines summarize the available evidence on risk factors, diagnosis, management and risk minimization strategies for drug-induced liver jury.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.014

Cites

366 of 366 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 371 references

5 of the 371 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Nicoletti, 2017, Genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify genetic risk factors that increase susceptibility to antituberculosis drug-induced liver injury (ATDILI) [Abstract], Hepatology, 66, A-25
  2. Lim, 2008, Association of HLA-B*1502 allele and carbamazepine-induced severe adverse cutaneous drug reaction among Asians, a review, Neurol Asia, 13, 15
  3. US Food & Drug Administration, 2017, Drugs
  4. Sanjuan-Jimenez, 2017, Prevalence of hepatitis E markers in Spanish patients with suspected drug-induced liver injury [abstract], Hepatology, 66, 423A
  5. Fernández-Castañer, 2008, An analysis of the causes, characteristics, and consequences of reexposure to a drug or compound responsible for a hepatotoxicity event, Rev Esp Enfermedades Dig, 100, 278

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,100 of 1,278

Metadata

Authors
Andrade, R. J., Aithal, G. P., Björnsson, E. S., Kaplowitz, N., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Larrey, D., & Karlsen, T. H.
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
1222-1261
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2924328881
Cited by
1,276
References
371
Citations by year
2026: 243 · 2025: 211 · 2024: 175 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 158 · 2021: 184 · 2020: 117 · 2019: 27
FWCI
78.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Cooperation in Science & Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
drug-induced liver injury, idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury, hepatotoxicity, acute liver failure, risk factors, diagnosis, risk minimization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Fatty Liver, Female, Histocompatibility Testing, Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mitochondria, Risk Factors, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review