Cited by 79Liver Diseases and ImmunityPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Proof-of-concept study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis

Vuppalanchi, Raj, Caldwell, Stephen H., Pyrsopoulos, Nikolaos, deLemos, Andrew S., Rossi, Simona, Levy, Cynthia, Goldberg, David S., Mena, Edward A. +6 more·2022·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

Background & aim Saroglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with dual agonistic properties (α/γ). Due to a strong mechanistic rationale, we aimed to test the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who were either ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) resistant or intolerant. Methods In this double-blind, phase II proof-of-concept trial, 37 patients with PBC were randomized to saroglitazar 4 mg (n = 13), saroglitazar 2 mg (n = 14), or placebo (n = 10) daily for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level at Week 16. Results A significant reduction of mean ALP levels was observed at Week 16 relative to baseline in both the saroglitazar 4 mg (least-squares [LS] mean =-163.3 U/L, SE = 25.1, p <0.001) and 2 mg (LS mean =-155.8 U/L, SE = 24.4, p <0.001) groups, compared with placebo (LS mean =-21.1 U/L, SE = 28.9). Treatment with saroglitazar resulted in a rapid reduction of ALP concentration at Week 4 that was sustained through the study duration. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 11 (84.6%) patients in the saroglitazar 4 mg group, in 12 (85.7%) patients in the 2 mg group and in 8 (80%) patients in the placebo group. Study drug was discontinued in 4 patients (3 patients in the 4 mg group and 1 patient in the 2 mg group) due to aminotransferase increases that promptly returned to baseline values after drug discontinuation. Conclusions Saroglitazar at 2 mg and 4 mg daily was tolerated and resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ALP. Further studies are underway at a daily dose of 2 mg and 1 mg due to the higher incidence of elevated liver enzymes observed with the 4 mg dose. CLINICALTRIALS. Gov identifier NCT03112681 LAY SUMMARY: Saroglitazar resulted in a rapid and sustained improvement in alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. The mean percentage reductions in alkaline phosphatase levels were 49% and 51% in the saroglitazar 4 mg and 2 mg groups compared to 3% in the placebo group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.08.025

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a placebo-controlled phase 2 RCT, 37 patients with primary biliary cholangitis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid were randomly assigned to receive 4 mg or 2 mg saroglitazar, or placebo.

    “In a placebo-controlled phase 2 RCT, 37 patients with primary biliary cholangitis receiving ursodeoxycholic acid were randomly assigned to receive 4 mg or 2 mg saroglitazar, or placebo.”

    From Primary biliary cholangitis. (2024) · cites this paper as [101]

  • Alkaline phosphatase was significantly reduced after 4 weeks of saroglitazar treatment compared with placebo, and this therapeutic effect was sustained during the 16-week treatment period.

    “Alkaline phosphatase was significantly reduced after 4 weeks of saroglitazar treatment compared with placebo, and this therapeutic effect was sustained during the 16-week treatment period.”

    From Primary biliary cholangitis. (2024) · cites this paper as [101]

  • Adverse events including liver injury occurred more frequently in the 4 mg saroglitazar group than in the 2 mg group.

    “Adverse events including liver injury occurred more frequently in the 4 mg group than in the 2 mg group.101”

    From Primary biliary cholangitis. (2024) · cites this paper as [101]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vuppalanchi, R., Caldwell, S. H., Pyrsopoulos, N., deLemos, A. S., Rossi, S., Levy, C., Goldberg, D. S., Mena, E. A., Sheikh, A., Ravinuthala, R., Shaikh, F., Bainbridge, J. D., Parmar, D. V., & Chalasani, N. P.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Einstein Healthcare Network (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • California Liver Research Institute (US)
  • Ohio Gastroenterology and Liver Institute (US)
  • Indiana University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Vuppalanchi, Raj
  • Chalasani, Naga P.
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
75-85
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3196850442
Cited by
79
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
saroglitazar, primary biliary cirrhosis, alkaline phosphatase, liver enzymes, aminotransferase elevation, drug safety, dose comparison, treatment-emergent adverse events, cholestatic liver disease, drug repurposing
MeSH terms
Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Male, Middle Aged, Phenylpropionates, Placebos, Pyrroles, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review