Cited by 379Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsLiver Diseases and Immunity

Saroglitazar, a PPAR-α/γ agonist, for treatment of NAFLD: a randomized controlled double-blind phase 2 trial

Open access
Gawrieh, Samer, Noureddin, Mazen, Loo, Nicole, Mohseni, Rizwana, Awasty, Vivek, Cusi, Kenneth, Kowdley, Kris V., Lai, Michelle +4 more·2021·Hepatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: NAFLD is characterized by insulin resistance and dysregulated lipid and glucose metabolism. Saroglitazar, a dual peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α/γ agonist, improves insulin sensitivity, and lipid and glycemic parameters. Saroglitazar improved NASH histology in animal studies. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of saroglitazar in patients with NAFLD/NASH. APPROACH AND RESULTS: were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive placebo or saroglitazar 1 mg, 2 mg, or 4 mg for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline in ALT levels at week 16. Liver fat content (LFC) was assessed by MRI proton density fat fraction. The least-squares mean percent change from baseline in ALT at week 16 was -25.5% (5.8), -27.7% (5.9), and -45.8% (5.7), with saroglitazar 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg, respectively, versus 3.4% (5.6) in placebo (P < 0.001 for all). Compared with placebo, saroglitazar 4 mg improved LFC (4.1% [5.9] vs. -19.7% [5.6]), adiponectin (-0.3 μg/mL [0.3] vs. 1.3 μg/mL [0.3]), homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (-1.3 [1.8] vs. -6.3 [1.7]), and triglycerides (-5.3 mg/dL [10.7] vs. -68.7 mg/dL [10.3]) (P < 0.05 for all). Saroglitazar 4 mg also improved lipoprotein particle composition and size and reduced lipotoxic lipid species. Saroglitazar was well-tolerated. A mean weight gain of 1.5 kg was observed with saroglitazar 4 mg versus 0.3 kg with placebo (P = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: Saroglitazar 4 mg significantly improved ALT, LFC, insulin resistance, and atherogenic dyslipidemia in participants with NAFLD/NASH. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03061721.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.31843

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Saroglitazar improved ALT and hepatic fat (measured via MRI-PDFF) but no improvement of NAS.

    “Two Phase II trials have investigated the effects of saroglitazar, a PPARα/γ agonist, and found improvement of ALT and hepatic fat (measured via MRI‐PDFF) [57] but no improvement of NAS (primary endpoint: delta change of NAS from baseline to Week 24 biopsy) [58].”

    From Current treatment of non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (2022) · cites this paper as [57]

  • Saroglitazar, a dual PPAR alpha/gamma agonist, has been shown to improve insulin resistance, liver steatosis and liver enzymes and is approved in India for the treatment of T2D and MASH.

    “Saroglitazar, a dual PPAR a / c agonist has been shown to improve insulin resistance, liver steatosis and liver enzymes 426 and is approved in India for the treatment of T2D and MASH.”
  • This lack of basic information may have confounded true treatment effects and results in serious difficulties concerning cross-trial comparisons.

    “This lack of basic information may have confounded true treatment effects and results in serious difficulties concerning cross-trial comparisons [240].”

    From Obesity and MASLD: Is weight loss the (only) key to treat metabolic liver disease? (2024) · cites this paper as [240]

    The Baseline Characteristics table reports patient information, and the Statistical Analysis section describes how this trial estimated treatment effects; neither addresses a lack of basic information confounding treatment effects or impeding cross-trial comparisons. Searches for the claim’s wording and for missing baseline information and cross-trial comparisons found no passage making that point. The available passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gawrieh, S., Noureddin, M., Loo, N., Mohseni, R., Awasty, V., Cusi, K., Kowdley, K. V., Lai, M., Schiff, E., Parmar, D., Patel, P., & Chalasani, N.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • Texas Liver Institute (US)
  • Catalina Research Institute (US)
  • Marion General Hospital (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Liver Institute Northwest (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Zydus Discovery DMCC,Dubai,UAE
  • Zydus Lifesciences Limited (India) (IN)
Corresponding author
Chalasani, Naga
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2021-07-19
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
1809-1824
ISSN
  • 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3350
OpenAlex
W3149930516
Cited by
379
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 87 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 25
FWCI
45.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Amgen
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Gilead Sciences
  • Celgene
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Allergan
  • Janssen Research and Development
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
saroglitazar, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, PPAR alpha/gamma agonist, insulin resistance, atherogenic dyslipidemia, liver fat, ALT, adiponectin, triglycerides, drug safety and tolerability, weight gain, PPARγ antagonist, PPARα
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Alanine Transaminase, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferases, Cholesterol, Double-Blind Method, Female, gamma-Glutamyltransferase, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Liver, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Phenylpropionates, Pyrroles, Triglycerides, Cholesterol, VLDL, PPAR alpha, PPAR gamma, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review