Cited by 65Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisLiver Diseases and Immunity

Familial coaggregation of MASLD with hepatocellular carcinoma and adverse liver outcomes: nationwide multigenerational cohort study

Open access
Ebrahimi, Fahim, Hagström, Hannes, Sun, Jiangwei, Bergman, David, Shang, Ying, Yang, Wen, Roelstraete, Bjorn, Ludvigsson, Jonas F.·2023·Journal of Hepatology

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD; formerly NAFLD) is the fastest growing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. However, whether family members of individuals with MASLD also share an increased risk of developing HCC is unknown. METHODS: This nationwide multigenerational cohort study involved family members of all Swedish adults diagnosed with biopsy-proven MASLD (1969-2017), and matched general population comparators. Using the Swedish Multi-generation Register, we identified 38,018 first-degree relatives (FDRs: parents, siblings, offspring) and 9,381 spouses of patients with MASLD, as well as 197,303 comparator FDRs and 47,572 comparator spouses. We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for HCC, major adverse liver outcomes (cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease or liver transplantation), liver-related mortality, extrahepatic cancer, and non-liver-related mortality. RESULTS: = 0.03). MASLD FDRs also had higher rates of major adverse liver outcomes (73 vs. 51/100,000 PY; aHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.36-1.69) and liver-related mortality (20 vs. 11/100,000 PY; aHR 2.14, 95% CI 1.67-2.74). MASLD FDRs with any concomitant chronic liver condition experienced accelerated progression of liver disease (aHR 1.47, 95% CI 1.29-1.67). MASLD spouses were at higher risks of major adverse liver outcomes (86 vs. 74/100,000 PY; aHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01-1.51) and liver-related mortality (25 vs. 19/100,000 PY; aHR 1.93, 95% CI 1.15-3.23), but not of HCC (aHR 1.43, 95% CI 0.87-2.35). CONCLUSIONS: There is distinct familial clustering of adverse liver-related outcomes in families of individuals with biopsy-proven MASLD, with higher relative risks of HCC, progressive liver disease, and liver-related mortality, but absolute risks are low. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD; formerly termed NAFLD) clusters in families with high genetic susceptibility and shared environmental risk factors, but the risks of developing hepatocellular carcinoma and other major liver-related outcomes in family members of individuals with MASLD are largely unknown. This large nationwide multigenerational cohort study involving family members (first-degree relatives and spouses) of individuals with biopsy-proven MASLD and of matched general population comparators found slightly increased risks of hepatocellular carcinoma in first-degree relatives, and of developing cirrhosis and liver-related mortality in all family members of individuals with biopsy-proven MASLD. The findings of this study provide large-scale evidence to inform clinical practice guidelines for recommendations on the early identification of individuals at higher risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.08.018

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Familial aggregation of SLD supports a genetic disease, particularly for early-onset SLD.

    “Familial aggregation of SLD supports a genetic disease, particularly for early-onset SLD. 9”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction describes familial clustering and heritability of MASLD, while the Discussion says genetic susceptibility may contribute to disease progression alongside environmental factors and comorbidities (page unavailable in our copy). Neither passage establishes SLD as a genetic disease, and the paper does not support the claim that this is particularly true for early-onset SLD. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Initial evidence indicates that first-degree relatives of individuals with advanced liver fibrosis due to MASLD are at increased risk of both MASLD (2- to 3-fold higher) and advanced liver fibrosis (12-fold higher), independently of metabolic risk factors.

    “Finally, there is initial evidence that fi rst-degree relatives of individuals with advanced liver fi brosis due to MASLD are at increased risk of both MASLD (2to 3-fold higher) and advanced liver fi brosis ( 12-fold higher), independently of metabolic risk factors.”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion reports a prior study finding a 12-fold higher risk of advanced fibrosis in first-degree relatives of people with MASLD-associated cirrhosis. It describes familial clustering of MASLD but does not give the claimed 2- to 3-fold MASLD risk or establish that the fibrosis association is independent of metabolic risk factors. Its discussion of independence from comorbid diabetes concerns HCC, not advanced fibrosis; no page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ebrahimi, F., Hagström, H., Sun, J., Bergman, D., Shang, Y., Yang, W., Roelstraete, B., & Ludvigsson, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Ebrahimi, Fahim
Venue
Journal of Hepatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
79
Issue
6
Pages
1374-1384
ISSN
0168-8278 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386226882
Cited by
65
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Hepatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (P500PM_210866)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
Keywords
non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, familial aggregation, first-degree relatives, spouses, major adverse liver outcomes, liver cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease, liver transplantation, liver-related mortality, extrahepatic cancer, chronic liver disease progression, genetic susceptibility, family risk factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review