Cited by 69Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Diseases and ImmunityLiver physiology and pathology

Risk of advanced fibrosis in first-degree relatives of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Open access
Tamaki, Nobuharu, Ahlholm, Noora, Luukkonen, Panu K., Porthan, Kimmo, Sharpton, Suzanne R., Ajmera, Veeral, Kono, Yuko, Dave, Shravan +16 more·2022·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

BACKGROUNDA pilot, single-center study showed that first-degree relatives of probands with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cirrhosis have a high risk of advanced fibrosis. We aimed to validate these findings using 2 independent cohorts from the US and Europe.METHODSThis prospective study included probands with NAFLD with advanced fibrosis, NAFLD without advanced fibrosis, and non-NAFLD, with at least 1 first-degree relative. A total of 396 first-degree relatives - 220 in a derivation cohort and 176 in a validation cohort - were enrolled in the study, and liver fibrosis was evaluated using magnetic resonance elastography and other noninvasive imaging modalities. The primary outcome was prevalence of advanced fibrosis in first-degree relatives.RESULTSPrevalence of advanced fibrosis in first-degree relatives of probands with NAFLD with advanced fibrosis, NAFLD without advanced fibrosis, and non-NAFLD was 15.6%, 5.9%, and 1.3%, respectively (P = 0.002), in the derivation cohort, and 14.0%, 2.6%, and 1.3%, respectively (P = 0.004), in the validation cohort. In multivariable-adjusted logistic regression models, age of ≥50 years (adjusted OR [aOR]: 2.63, 95% CI 1.0-6.7), male sex (aOR: 3.79, 95% CI 1.6-9.2), diabetes mellitus (aOR: 3.37, 95% CI 1.3-9), and a first-degree relative with NAFLD with advanced fibrosis (aOR: 11.8, 95% CI 2.5-57) were significant predictors of presence of advanced fibrosis (all P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONFirst-degree relatives of probands with NAFLD with advanced fibrosis have significantly increased risk of advanced fibrosis. Routine screening should be done in the first-degree relatives of patients with advanced fibrosis.FUNDINGSupported by NCATS (5UL1TR001442), NIDDK (U01DK061734, U01DK130190, R01DK106419, R01DK121378, R01DK124318, P30DK120515, K23DK119460), NHLBI (P01HL147835), and NIAAA (U01AA029019); Academy of Finland grant 309263; the Novo Nordisk, EVO, and Sigrid Jusélius Foundations; and the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking under grant agreement 777377. This Joint Undertaking receives support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program and the EFPIA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci162513

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial evidence indicates that first-degree relatives of individuals with advanced liver fibrosis due to MASLD are at increased risk of both MASLD (2- to 3-fold higher) and advanced liver fibrosis (12-fold higher), independently of metabolic risk factors.

    “Finally, there is initial evidence that fi rst-degree relatives of individuals with advanced liver fi brosis due to MASLD are at increased risk of both MASLD (2to 3-fold higher) and advanced liver fi brosis ( 12-fold higher), independently of metabolic risk factors.”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [135]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Initial data suggest that individuals with strong family history, early disease onset, or lack of accruing factors may benefit from a comprehensive genetic evaluation that may identify strong genetic determinants of SLD with potential implications for treatment and family counselling.

    “Initial data suggest that individuals with a) strong family history, b) early disease onset, or c) lack of accruing factors may bene fi t from a comprehensive genetic evaluation ( e.g. whole-exome sequencing or targeted panel sequencing) that may identify strong genetic determinants of SLD with potential implications for treatment and family counselling. 135,208 -211”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [135]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tamaki, N., Ahlholm, N., Luukkonen, P. K., Porthan, K., Sharpton, S. R., Ajmera, V., Kono, Y., Dave, S., Ahmed, A., Sundaram, V., Wilkinson, M. J., Patton, H., Gupta, H., Cervantes, V., Hernandez, C., Lopez, S. J., Loomba, R., Baumgartner, A., Richards, L., Arkkila, P. E. T., Nemes, K., Isoniemi, H., Yki-Järvinen, H., & Loomba, R.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
Corresponding author
Loomba, Rohit
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2022-11-01
Volume
132
Issue
21
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W4307717780
Cited by
69
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16
FWCI
9.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland, Novo Nordisk, EVO and Sigrid Juselius Foundations (H.Y.-J.) and by the Innovative medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking (309263,777377)
  • NCATS, NIDDK, NHLBI, NIAAA (5UL1TR001442,U01DK061734,R01DK106419,R01DK121378,R01DK124318,P30DK120515,U01DK130190,P01HL147835,U01AA029019,K23DK119460)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
first-degree relatives, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, advanced liver fibrosis, familial risk, magnetic resonance elastography, liver fibrosis screening, diabetes mellitus, age and sex predictors, noninvasive fibrosis assessment, fibrosis staging
MeSH terms
Fibrosis, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review