Cited by 47Thoreau and American LiteratureElectronic Health Records SystemsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Electronic Communication of Protected Health Information: Privacy, Security, and HIPAA Compliance

Drolet, Brian C., Marwaha, Jayson S., Hyatt, Brad, Blazar, Phillip E., Lifchez, Scott D.·2017·The Journal of Hand Surgery

Abstract

Purpose Technology has enhanced modern health care delivery, particularly through accessibility to health information and ease of communication with tools like mobile device messaging (texting). However, text messaging has created new risks for breach of protected health information (PHI). In the current study, we sought to evaluate hand surgeons' knowledge and compliance with privacy and security standards for electronic communication by text message.Methods A cross-sectional survey of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand membership was conducted in March and April 2016. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed of composite results as well as relevant subgroup analyses.Results A total of 409 responses were obtained (11% response rate). Although 63% of surgeons reported that they believe that text messaging does not meet Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 security standards, only 37% reported they do not use text messages to communicate PHI. Younger surgeons and respondents who believed that their texting was compliant were statistically significantly more like to report messaging of PHI (odds ratio, 1.59 and 1.22, respectively).Discussion A majority of hand surgeons in this study reported the use of text messaging to communicate PHI. Of note, neither the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 statute nor US Department of Health and Human Services specifically prohibits this form of electronic communication. To be compliant, surgeons, practices, and institutions need to take reasonable security precautions to prevent breach of privacy with electronic communication.Clinical relevance Communication of clinical information by text message is not prohibited under Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, but surgeons should use appropriate safeguards to prevent breach when using this form of communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.023

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drolet, B. C., Marwaha, J. S., Hyatt, B., Blazar, P. E., & Lifchez, S. D.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Brooke Army Medical Center (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Drolet, Brian C.
Venue
The Journal of Hand Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
411-416
ISSN
0363-5023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620670582
Cited by
46
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal Of Hand Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
protected health information, text messaging, HIPAA compliance, health information privacy, health information security, hand surgeons, digital communication, data breaches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review