Cited by 53Hydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFire effects on ecosystemsGroundwater flow and contamination studies

Catchment-scale stream temperature response to land disturbance by wildfire governed by surface–subsurface energy exchange and atmospheric controls

Wagner, Michael J., Bladon, Kevin D., Silins, Uldis, Williams, Chris H.S., Martens, Amanda M., Boon, Sarah, MacDonald, Ryan J., Stone, Micheal +2 more·2014·Journal of Hydrology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.006

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased direct radiation to streams results in increased annual and seasonal stream temperatures, often lasting until riparian vegetation reestablishment.

    “The result of increased direct radiation to streams is increased annual and seasonal stream temperatures, often lasting until riparian vegetation reestablishment (Minshall et al., 1997; Rhoades et al., 2011; Wagner et al., 2014).”
  • Aquatic ecosystems can be impacted by sediment and turbidity through clogging of the streambed with fine sediment, increased channel instability, altered stream temperatures, impairment of fish feeding, and destabilized channel morphology.

    “Aquatic ecosystems can be impacted (growth and survival of macrophytes, aquatic invertebrates, and fish) by sediment and turbidity through clogging of the streambed with fine sediment, increased channel instability, altered stream temperatures, impairment of fish feeding, and destabilized channel morphology.47,48”

    From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, M. J., Bladon, K. D., Silins, U., Williams, C. H. S., Martens, A. M., Boon, S., MacDonald, R. J., Stone, M., Emelko, M. B., & Anderson, A.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Environment and Protected Areas (CA)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Lethbridge (CA)
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Bladon, Kevin D.
Venue
Journal of Hydrology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
517
Pages
328-338
ISSN
0022-1694 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036032797
Cited by
53
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Hydrology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alberta Innovates
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Keywords
stream temperature, wildfire effects, post-fire salvage logging, groundwater-surface water interaction, advective heat flux, thermal regime, headwater catchments, air temperature, catchment disturbance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review