Cited by 717Fire effects on ecosystemsClimate variability and modelsEcosystem dynamics and resilience

Driving forces of global wildfires over the past millennium and the forthcoming century

Open access
Pechony, O., Shindell, D. T.·2010·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Recent bursts in the incidence of large wildfires worldwide have raised concerns about the influence climate change and humans might have on future fire activity. Comparatively little is known, however, about the relative importance of these factors in shaping global fire history. Here we use fire and climate modeling, combined with land cover and population estimates, to gain a better understanding of the forces driving global fire trends. Our model successfully reproduces global fire activity record over the last millennium and reveals distinct regimes in global fire behavior. We find that during the preindustrial period, the global fire regime was strongly driven by precipitation (rather than temperature), shifting to an anthropogenic-driven regime with the Industrial Revolution. Our future projections indicate an impending shift to a temperature-driven global fire regime in the 21st century, creating an unprecedentedly fire-prone environment. These results suggest a possibility that in the future climate will play a considerably stronger role in driving global fire trends, outweighing direct human influence on fire (both ignition and suppression), a reversal from the situation during the last two centuries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1003669107

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More frequent, larger fires are predicted in Canada, the western U.S., South America, central Asia, southern Europe, southern Africa, and Australia.

    “This is consistent with predictions of more frequent, larger fires in Canada, the western U.S., South America, central Asia, southern Europe, southern Africa, and Australia.10,22”

    From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [10]

  • The same trends of conversion from surface fire to infrequent crown fire are documented in low-and mid-elevation forests throughout the west but more slowly where productivity is lower.

    “The same trends are documented in low-and mid-elevation forests throughout the west (Keane et al. 2002;Hessburg et al. 2005;Pechony and Shindall 2010) but more slowly where productivity is lower (e.g.Colorado).”

    From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Pechony and Shindall 2010

  • Several modelling studies have shown that increasing global temperatures could lead to increases in fire occurrence in some areas and decreases in others.

    “Several modelling studies have shown that increasing global temperatures could lead to increases in fire occurrence in some areas of the globe, but to decreases in others (Scholze et al., 2006; Krawchuk et al., 2009; Pechony & Shindell, 2010).”

    From The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth (2011) · cites this paper as Pechony & Shindell, 2010

  • Pechony & Shindell predict that in the 21st century fire activity may become controlled by increased temperature, overwhelming human ignitions and suppression efforts.

    “They predict that, in the 21st century, fire activity may become controlled by increased temperature, overwhelming both human ignitions and suppression efforts.”

    From The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth (2011) · cites this paper as Pechony & Shindell, 2010

  • Pechony & Shindell's modelling revealed a switch from moisture-limited fire activity in the pre-industrial period to anthropogenic-driven ignition regimes as the Industrial Revolution proceeded.

    “While they noted high levels of uncertainty and a paucity of global data on past fire activity, their modelling revealed a switch from moisture-limited fire activity in the pre-industrial period, when human populations were low, to anthropogenic-driven ignition regimes as the Industrial Revolution proceeded in step with human population growth.”

    From The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth (2011) · cites this paper as Pechony & Shindell, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pechony, O., & Shindell, D. T.
Affiliations
Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US)
Corresponding author
Pechony, O.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2010-10-25
Volume
107
Issue
45
Pages
19167-19170
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2168894097
Cited by
717
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 43
FWCI
27.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • University of Oregon
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
fire regimes, climate change, anthropogenic fire, precipitation, temperature, fire history, last millennium, fire suppression, land cover change, population growth, fire ignition
MeSH terms
Fires, Forecasting, Humans, Human Activities, Industry, Rain, Temperature, History, 21st Century, History, Ancient, Climate Change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review