Cited by 113Fire effects on ecosystemsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Wildfire impacts on nitrogen concentration and production from headwater streams in southern Alberta’s Rocky Mountains

Bladon, Kevin D., Silins, Uldis, Wagner, Michael J., Stone, Micheal, Emelko, Monica B., Mendoza, Carl A., Devito, Kevin J., Boon, Sarah·2008·Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine initial effects of the 2003 Lost Creek wildfire (southwestern Rocky Mountains of Alberta) on concentrations and production (yield and total export) of several nitrogen (N) forms, and to explore initial recovery of these effects within the first 3 years after the fire. During the first postfire year, nitrate (NO 3–), dissolved organic nitrogen (DON), and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations in severely burned watershed streams were 6.5, 4.1, and 5.3 times greater, respectively, than those in reference streams. Weaker effects were evident for concentrations of ammonium (NH 4+; 1.5 times) and total particulate nitrogen (TPN; 3.0 times). A rapid decline in mean watershed concentrations and production of NO 3–, DON, total dissolved nitrogen (TDN), and TN was observed from burned watersheds over the three seasons after the fire. However, elevated NO 3–, TDN, and TN concentrations and production were still evident during the snowmelt freshet and following precipitation events after 3 years. Effects of the burn were strongly influenced by the regional flow regime, with the most elevated N concentrations and production occurring during higher discharge periods (snowmelt freshet and storm flows).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/x08-071

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The largest fluxes of nitrogen, primarily as nitrate, are generally observed in the first year postfire as nitrogen is rapidly mobilized with runoff.

    “The largest fluxes of N (primarily as nitrate) are generally observed in the first year postfire as N is rapidly mobilized with runoff.67”

    From Wildfire and the Future of Water Supply (2014) · cites this paper as [67]

  • This P-Ca interaction may influence algal and cyanobacterial growth (and thus eutrophication) by regulating P levels in freshwater systems.

    “This P-Ca interaction may influence algal and cyanobacterial growth (and thus, eutrophication) by regulating P levels in freshwater systems (Bladon et al. 2008;Blake et al. 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bladon, K. D., Silins, U., Wagner, M. J., Stone, M., Emelko, M. B., Mendoza, C. A., Devito, K. J., & Boon, S.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Forest Research
Published
2008-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
2359-2371
ISSN
  • 0045-5067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1208-6037
OpenAlex
W2041387722
Cited by
113
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Canadian Journal of Forest Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
wildfire effects, nitrogen export, nitrate, dissolved organic nitrogen, ammonium, particulate nitrogen, headwater streams, post-fire recovery, river flow regime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review