Cited by 41Optical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Research Techniques Made Simple: Emerging Imaging Technologies for Noninvasive Optical Biopsy of Human Skin

Open access
Lentsch, Griffin, Baugh, Erica G., Lee, Bonnie, Aszterbaum, Michelle, Zachary, Christopher B., Kelly, Kristen M., Balu, Mihaela·2022·Journal of Investigative Dermatology

Abstract

Over the past few years, high-resolution optical imaging technologies such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), and multiphoton microscopy (MPM) have advanced significantly as new methodologies for clinical research and for real-time detection, diagnosis, and therapy monitoring of skin diseases. Implementation of these technologies into clinical research and practice requires clinicians to have an understanding of their capabilities, benefits, and limitations. This concise review provides insights on the application of OCT, RCM, and MPM for clinical skin imaging through images acquired in vivo from the same lesions. The presented data are limited to pigmented lesions and basal cell carcinoma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jid.2022.01.016

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Laboratory for Fluorescence Dynamics. 15th LFD Workshop in Advanced Fluorescence Imaging and Dynamics. https://www.lfd.uci.edu/workshop/; 2021 (accessed October 19, 2021).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lentsch, G., Baugh, E. G., Lee, B., Aszterbaum, M., Zachary, C. B., Kelly, K. M., & Balu, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Balu, Mihaela
Venue
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
142
Issue
5
Pages
1243-1252.e1
ISSN
0022-202X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224256031
Cited by
41
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Investigative Dermatology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (P30AR075047)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB026705)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Optical Coherence Tomography Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
optical coherence tomography, reflectance confocal microscopy, multiphoton microscopy, skin imaging, pigmented skin lesions, basal cell carcinoma, in vivo imaging, dermatological diagnosis, treatment monitoring
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Humans, Research Design, Skin, Skin Neoplasms, Microscopy, Confocal, Tomography, Optical Coherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review