The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Review of magnesium-based biomaterials and their applications
Open accessAbstract
In biomedical applications, the conventionally used metallic materials, including stainless steel, Co-based alloys and Ti alloys, often times exhibit unsatisfactory results such as stress shielding and metal ion releases. Secondary surgical operation(s) usually become inevitable to prevent long term exposure of body with the toxic implant contents. The metallic biomaterials are being revolutionized with the development of biodegradable materials including several metals, alloys, and metallic glasses. As such, the nature of metallic biomaterials are transformed from the bioinert to bioactive and multi-biofunctional (anti-bacterial, anti-proliferation, anti-cancer, etc.). Magnesium-based biomaterials are candidates to be used as new generation biodegradable metals. Magnesium (Mg) can dissolve in body fluid that means the implanted Mg can degrade during healing process, and if the degradation is controlled it would leave no debris after the completion of healing. Hence, the need for secondary surgical operation(s) for the implant removal could be eliminated. Besides its biocompatibility, the inherent mechanical properties of Mg are very similar to those of human bone. Researchers have been working on synthesis and characterization of Mg-based biomaterials with a variety of composition in order to control the degradation rate of Mg since uncontrolled degradation could result in loss of mechanical integrity, metal contamination in the body and intolerable hydrogen evolution by tissue. It was observed that the applied methods of synthesis and the choice of components affect the characteristics and performance of the Mg-based biomaterials. Researchers have synthesized many Mg-based materials through several synthesis routes and investigated their mechanical properties, biocompatibility and degradation behavior through in vitro, in vivo and in silico studies. This paper is a comprehensive review that compiles, analyses and critically discusses the recent literature on the important aspects of Mg-based biomaterials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review on magnesium alloys for biomedical applications
Zhang, T., Wang, W., Liu, J., Wang, L., Tang, Y., & Wang, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.953344 · Cited by 208
Wang, Z., Liu, B., Yin, B., Zheng, Y., Tian, Y., & Wen, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2022.1066103 · Cited by 30
“Biomechanical strength, including the yield and ultimate tensile strengths, is generally influenced by chemical composition, grain size, and printing parameters (Sezer et al., 2018).”
BackgroundFarshid, S., Kharaziha, M., Salehi, H., & Ganjalikhani Hakemi, M. (2023) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.3c11184 · Cited by 23
Martinez, D. C., Borkam-Schuster, A., Helmholz, H., Dobkowska, A., Luthringer-Feyerabend, B., Płociński, T., Willumeit-Römer, R., & Święszkowski, W. (2024) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2024.08.015 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Sezer, N., Evis, Z., Kayhan, S. M., Tahmasebifar, A., & Koç, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnesium and Alloys
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-43
- ISSN
- 2213-9567 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2799548613
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of magnesium-based biomaterials and their applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jma.2018.02.003
- The paper
- Sezer, N., Evis, Z., Kayhan, S. M., Tahmasebifar, A., & Koç, M. (2018). Review of magnesium-based biomaterials and their applications. Journal of Magnesium and Alloys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2018.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.