Cited by 99Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Aβ40 Protects Non-toxic Aβ42 Monomer from Aggregation

Yan, Yilin, Wang, Chunyu·2007·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

Abeta40 and Abeta42 are the predominant Abeta species in the human body. Toxic Abeta42 oligomers and fibrils are believed to play a key role in causing Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the role of Abeta40 in AD pathogenesis is not well established. Emerging evidence indicates a protective role for Abeta40 in AD pathogenesis. Although Abeta40 is known to inhibit Abeta42 fibril formation, it is not clear whether the inhibition acts on the non-toxic monomer or acts on the toxic Abeta42 oligomers. In contrast to conventional methods that detect the appearance of fibrils, in our study Abeta42 aggregation was monitored by the decreasing NMR signals from Abeta42 monomers. In addition, differential NMR isotope labelling enabled the selective observation of Abeta42 aggregation in a mixture of Abeta42 and Abeta40. We found Abeta40 monomers inhibit the aggregation of non-toxic Abeta42 monomers, in an Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio-dependent manner. NMR titration revealed that Abeta40 monomers bind to Abeta42 aggregates with higher affinity than Abeta42 monomers. Abeta40 can also release Abeta42 monomers from Abeta42 aggregates. Thus, Abeta40 likely protects Abeta42 monomers by competing for the binding sites on pre-existing Abeta42 aggregates. Combining our data with growing evidence from transgenic mice and human genetics, we propose that Abeta40 plays a critical, protective role in Alzheimer's by inhibiting the aggregation of Abeta42 monomer. Abeta40 itself, a peptide already present in the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.04.014

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Almost all previous studies investigating the effect of bifunctional compounds on the neurotoxicity of metal-Aβ species have focused on the less neurotoxic and possibly even anti-amyloidogenic Aβ40 peptide.

    “Almost all previous studies investigating the effect of bifunctional compounds on the neurotoxicity of metal-Aβ species have focused on the less neurotoxic and possibly even anti-amyloidogenic Aβ40 peptide.9,97,98”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yan, Y., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Chunyu
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-06
Volume
369
Issue
4
Pages
909-916
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096665275
Cited by
99
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Aβ40, amyloid-beta 42, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid fibril formation, Aβ42 oligomers, NMR titration, peptide binding affinity, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, Alzheimer's disease treatment
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Humans, Peptide Fragments, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neuroprotective Agents, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review