Cited by 206CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryRNA regulation and disease

Directed evolution of an enhanced and highly efficient FokI cleavage domain for zinc finger nucleases

Open access
Guo, Jing, Gaj, Thomas, Barbas, Carlos F.·2010·Journal of Molecular Biology

Abstract

Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) are powerful tools for gene therapy and genetic engineering. The high specificity and affinity of these chimeric enzymes are based on custom-designed zinc finger proteins (ZFPs). To improve the performance of existing ZFN technology, we developed an in vivo evolution-based approach to improve the efficacy of the FokI cleavage domain (FCD). After multiple rounds of cycling mutagenesis and DNA shuffling, a more efficient nuclease variant (Sharkey) was generated. In vivo analyses indicated that Sharkey is >15-fold more active than wild-type FCD on a diverse panel of cleavage sites. Further, a mammalian cell-based assay showed a three to sixfold improvement in targeted mutagenesis for ZFNs containing derivatives of the Sharkey cleavage domain. We also identified mutations that impart sequence specificity to the FCD that might be utilized in future studies to further refine ZFNs through cooperative specificity. In addition, Sharkey was observed to enhance the cleavage profiles of previously published and newly selected heterodimer ZFN architectures. This enhanced and highly efficient cleavage domain will aid in a variety of ZFN applications in medicine and biology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.060

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because the genome contains numerous sequence repetitions or highly homologous DNA sequences, efforts have been made to improve off-target effects and specificity of ZFN and TALEN enzymes.

    “Because the genome contains numerous sequence repetitions or has highly homologous DNA sequences, efforts have been made in the last years to improve the offtarget effects and the specificity of these enzymes (Miller et al., 2007;Szczepek et al., 2007;Guo et al., 2010;Doyon et al., 2011).”

    From Therapeutic glycoprotein production in mammalian cells (2017) · cites this paper as Guo et al., 2010

    The Discussion says that improving the FokI cleavage domain’s discrimination between highly homologous target sites may increase ZFN specificity and reduce off-target cleavage. It does not address TALENs or establish that numerous genomic repetitions motivated these efforts; the specificity and off-target benefits are framed as possibilities, not demonstrated outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Dreier B 2005 D evelopment of zinc finger domains for recognition of the 5′-CNN-3′ family DNA sequences and their use in the construction of artificial transcription factors J Biol Chem 280 35588 35597 16107335
  2. [27]Cornu TI 2008 DNA-binding specificity is a major determinant of the activity and toxicity of zinc-finger nucleases Mol Ther 16 352 358 28178540

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, J., Gaj, T., & Barbas, C. F.
Affiliations
Scripps Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Barbas, Carlos F.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
400
Issue
1
Pages
96-107
ISSN
0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144141440
Cited by
206
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM065059)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
zinc finger nucleases, directed evolution, in vivo evolution, DNA shuffling, targeted mutagenesis, sequence specificity, genome editing
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Humans, Models, Molecular, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-Specific, Zinc Fingers, Directed Molecular Evolution, Catalytic Domain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review