The evolution and structure prediction of coiled coils across all genomes.
Abstract
Coiled coils are α-helical interactions found in many natural proteins. Various sequence-based coiled-coil predictors are available, but key issues remain: oligomeric state and protein-protein interface prediction and extension to all genomes. We present SpiriCoil (http://supfam.org/SUPERFAMILY/spiricoil), which is based on a novel approach to the coiled-coil prediction problem for coiled coils that fall into known superfamilies: hundreds of hidden Markov models representing coiled-coil-containing domain families. Using whole domains gives the advantage that sequences flanking the coiled coils help. SpiriCoil performs at least as well as existing methods at detecting coiled coils and significantly advances the state of the art for oligomer state prediction. SpiriCoil has been run on over 16 million sequences, including all completely sequenced genomes (more than 1200), and a resulting Web interface supplies data downloads, alignments, scores, oligomeric state classifications, three-dimensional homology models and visualisation. This has allowed, for the first time, a genomewide analysis of coiled-coil evolution. We found that coiled coils have arisen independently de novo well over a hundred times, and these are observed in 16 different oligomeric states. Coiled coils in almost all oligomeric states were present in the last universal common ancestor of life. The vast majority of occasions that individual coiled coils have arisen de novo were before the last universal common ancestor of life; we do, however, observe scattered instances throughout subsequent evolutionary history, mostly in the formation of the eukaryote superkingdom. Coiled coils do not change their oligomeric state over evolution and did not evolve from the rearrangement of existing helices in proteins; coiled coils were forged in unison with the fold of the whole protein.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SpiriCoil and similar profile-HMM methods cannot predict structures for novel families with limited sequence similarity to known families.
“Although powerful for some applications, a limitation is that these methods cannot predict structures for novel families with limited sequence similarity to known families.”
From Multicoil2: Predicting Coiled Coils and Their Oligomerization States from Sequence in the Twilight Zone (2011) · cites this paper as [11]
Initial attempts on predicting oligomerization states in coiled coils focused on distinguishing dimers from trimers.
“Initial attempts on predicting oligomerization states in coiled coils focused on distinguishing dimers from trimers.34−39”
From Assessment of the Topology and Oligomerisation States of Coiled Coils Using Metadynamics with Conformational Restraints (2025) · cites this paper as [37]
Cites
Paircoil2: improved prediction of coiled coils from sequence.
McDonnell, A. V., Jiang, T., Keating, A. E., & Berger, B. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti797 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Walshaw, J., & Woolfson, D. N. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.4545 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Self-citationExtended knobs-into-holes packing in classical and complex coiled-coil assemblies☆
Walshaw, J., & Woolfson, D. N. (2003) · Journal of Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.014 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future
Finn, R. D., Coggill, P., Eberhardt, R. Y., Eddy, S. R., Mistry, J., Mitchell, A. L., Potter, S. C., Punta, M., Qureshi, M., Sangrador-Vegas, A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1344 · Cited by 5,975 · see citing works
An atlas of protein homo-oligomerization across domains of life
Schweke, H., Pacesa, M., Levin, T., Goverde, C. A., Kumar, P., Duhoo, Y., Dornfeld, L. J., Dubreuil, B., Georgeon, S., Ovchinnikov, S., et al. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.022 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationCoiled-Coil Design: Updated and Upgraded
Woolfson, D. N. (2017) · Subcellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49674-0_2 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Self-citationUnderstanding a protein fold: The physics, chemistry, and biology of α-helical coiled coils
Woolfson, D. N. (2023) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104579 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“Estimates across all genomes suggest ≈ 0.5 to 6.5% of protein sequences contain coiled-coil regions (232).”
InfluentialSelf-citationTrigg, J., Gutwin, K., Keating, A. E., & Berger, B. (2011) · PLoS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023519 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
SCORER 2.0: an algorithm for distinguishing parallel dimeric and trimeric coiled-coil sequences
Armstrong, C. T., Vincent, T. L., Green, P. J., & Woolfson, D. N. (2011) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr299 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Self-citationCritical assessment of coiled-coil predictions based on protein structure data
Simm, D., Hatje, K., Waack, S., & Kollmar, M. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91886-w · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Notari, E., Wood, C. W., & Michel, J. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01695 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rackham, O. J. L., Madera, M., Armstrong, C. T., Vincent, T. L., Woolfson, D. N., & Gough, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gough, Julian
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 403
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-493
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125531604
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/G022771/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- coiled coil, protein-protein interfaces, hidden Markov models, protein superfamilies, last universal common ancestor, protein structure prediction, homology model, genome-wide analysis
- MeSH terms
- Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Software, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Computational Biology, Databases as Topic, Protein Multimerization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review