The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The CamSol Method of Rational Design of Protein Mutants with Enhanced Solubility
Abstract
Protein solubility is often an essential requirement in biotechnological and biomedical applications. Great advances in understanding the principles that determine this specific property of proteins have been made during the past decade, in particular concerning the physicochemical characteristics of their constituent amino acids. By exploiting these advances, we present the CamSol method for the rational design of protein variants with enhanced solubility. The method works by performing a rapid computational screening of tens of thousand of mutations to identify those with the greatest impact on the solubility of the target protein while maintaining its native state and biological activity. The application to a single-domain antibody that targets the Alzheimer's Aβ peptide demonstrates that the method predicts with great accuracy solubility changes upon mutation, thus offering a cost-effective strategy to help the production of soluble proteins for academic and industrial purposes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To predict the solubility and aggregation propensity of protein, several prediction tools have been developed, such as the Camsol [25], and SOLart [26], with SOLart currently holding state-of-the-art performance.”
From Computational and artificial intelligence-based methods for antibody development (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
In the citing paper
“Good solubility is crucial [202, 203] to avoid aggregation that can potentially lead to loss of activity, degradation of antibodies or immunogenicity, as discussed previously.”
From Computational approaches to therapeutic antibody design: established methods and emerging trends (2020) · cites this paper as [202]
Citations
Cites
Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD
Phillips, J. C., Braun, R., Wang, W., Gumbart, J., Tajkhorshid, E., Villa, E., Chipot, C., Skeel, R. D., Kalé, L., & Schulten, K. (2005) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20289 · Cited by 16,914
Comparative Protein Modelling by Satisfaction of Spatial Restraints
Šali, A., & Blundell, T. L. (1993) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1993.1626 · Cited by 12,977
Protein folding and misfolding
Dobson, C. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02261 · Cited by 4,791
Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis
Hartl, F. U., Bracher, A., & Hayer-Hartl, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10317 · Cited by 3,381
Adapting Proteostasis for Disease Intervention
Balch, W. E., Morimoto, R. I., Dillin, A., & Kelly, J. W. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1141448 · Cited by 2,495
Protein Therapeutics: A Summary and Pharmacological Classification
Leader, B., Baca, Q. J., & Golan, D. E. (2008) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2399 · Cited by 2,161
Aggresomes, inclusion bodies and protein aggregation
Kopito, R. R. (2000) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/s0962-8924(00)01852-3 · Cited by 1,942
Modeller: Generation and Refinement of Homology-Based Protein Structure Models
Fiser, A., & Šali, A. (2003) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(03)74020-8 · Cited by 1,708
Experimentally determined hydrophobicity scale for proteins at membrane interfaces
Wimley, W. C., & White, S. H. (1996) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb1096-842 · Cited by 1,691
Prediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins
Fernández‐Escamilla, A. M., Rousseau, F., Schymkowitz, J. W. H., & Serrano, L. G. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1012 · Cited by 1,667
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 494
Vormittag, P., Klamp, T., & Hubbuch, J. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00395 · Cited by 16
“…SVM or random forest classifiers (Magnan et al., 2009; Agostini et al., 2012; Samak et al., 2012; Xiaohui et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2016) and sliding-window-based algorithms, such as AGGRESCAN, Zyggregator, and CamSol (Conchillo-Sole et al., 2007; Tartaglia et al., 2008; Sormanni et al., 2015).”
MethodAbsoluRATE: An in-silico method to predict the aggregation kinetics of native proteins
Rawat, P., Prabakaran, R., Kumar, S., & Gromiha, M. M. (2021) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2021.140682 · Cited by 16
Althurwi, H. N., Alharthy, K. M., Albaqami, F. F., Altharawi, A., Javed, M. R., Muhseen, Z. T., & Qamar, M. T. U. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192013054 · Cited by 16
“The antigenic and immunogenic epitopes that were shortlisted from previous steps were investigated for solubility by the CamSol Intrinsic server [34].”
MethodRPPSP: A Robust and Precise Protein Solubility Predictor by Utilizing Novel Protein Sequence Encoder
Mehmood, F., Arshad, S., & Shoaib, M. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3284464 · Cited by 14
“…for E.coli dataset, following evaluation criteria of existing predictors [2], [12], [18], [33], [35], [36], [38], [41], [57], [67], [68], [75], [78], [84], [88], proposed predictor is evaluated on standard split where 90% sequence samples are used for predictor training and 10% sequences are…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAntibody–antigen complex modelling in the era of immunoglobulin repertoire sequencing
Raybould, M. I. J., Wong, W. K., & Deane, C. M. (2019) · Molecular Systems Design & Engineering · doi:10.1039/c9me00034h · Cited by 14
Binding symmetry and surface flexibility mediate antibody self-association
Schrag, J. D., Picard, M.-È., Gaudreault, F., Gagnon, L.-P., Baardsnes, J., Manenda, M. S., Sheff, J. G., Deprez, C., Baptista, C. D. S., Hogues, H., et al. (2019) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2019.1632114 · Cited by 17
“In this category, we evaluated 4 approaches: 1) the Spatial Aggregation Propensity (SAP) method based on molecular dynamics (MD) ensembles;(11,16) 2) the SAP-related Developability Index (DI),(17) which was fitted to the present data; 3) the AGGRESCAN3D method in both static and dynamics modes;(54) and 4) the structur…”
MethodJohnson, R. A. (1974) · PubMed Central · Cited by 16
De Novo Peptides That Induce the Liquid–Liquid Phase Separation of α-Synuclein
Ikenoue, T., So, M., Terasaka, N., Huang, W., Kawata, Y., Miyanoiri, Y., Kamagata, K., & Suga, H. (2025) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5c08019 · Cited by 15
“68 For the NAC-region-truncated α Syn ( α Syn NPC ), α Syn 1 − 40 -Cys- NH 2 and Lys(N 3 )- α Syn 100 − 140 -NH 2 were synthesized by Fmoc SPPS.”
Uncovering the molecular mechanisms behind disease-associated leptin variants
Haglund, E., Nguyen, L., Schafer, N. P., Lammert, H., Jennings, P. A., & Onuchic, J. N. (2018) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.ra118.003957 · Cited by 17
“We thank Pietro Sormanni for running the CamSol calculations.”
MethodInfluentialNoji, M., So, M., Yamaguchi, K., Hojo, H., Onda, M., Ogawa, Y., Hagihara, Y., & Goto, Y. (2018) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00619 · Cited by 15
Carballo-Amador, M. A., McKenzie, E. A., Dickson, A. J., & Warwicker, J. (2019) · BMC Biotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12896-019-0520-z · Cited by 16
GraPES: The Granule Protein Enrichment Server for prediction of biological condensate constituents
Kuechler, E. R., Jacobson, M., Mayor, T., & Gsponer, J. A. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac279 · Cited by 15
“In short, it is based on a general linearized model (GLM) that uses the protein features of protein abundance (14), percent protein intrinsic disorder (15), number of annotated phosphorylation sites (16,17), PScore (18), Camsol score (19), RNA interaction (20,21), and percent composition of leucine and glycine to gene…”
BackgroundBerner, C., Menzen, T., Winter, G., & Svilenov, H. L. (2021) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.1c00017 · Cited by 15
Bielska, W., Jaszczyszyn, I., Dudzic, P., Janusz, B., Chomicz, D., Wrobel, S., Greiff, V., Feehan, R., Adolf‐Bryfogle, J., & Krawczyk, K. (2025) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1571371 · Cited by 17
“Because of data scarcity, many methods, such as the Oracles (Table 2, Figure 3A), focus on close-to-exhaustive enumeration of binders, followed by computational fi ltering for developable antibodies using general tools such as the Therapeutic Antibody Pro fi ler (122) or Camsol (123).”
Strategies for enhancing protein solubility: methods, applications, and prospects
Cao, R., Wang, W., Zhang, Z., Wang, C., Huang, Q., Yan, L., Zhang, J., & Cheng, J. (2026) · npj Science of Food · doi:10.1038/s41538-026-00743-5 · Cited by 18
Zhang, C., Bye, J. W., Lui, L. H., Zhang, H., Hales, J. E., Brocchini, S., Curtis, R., & Dalby, P. A. (2023) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00081 · Cited by 14
“20 To mitigate aggregation, both the intrinsic protein properties (e.g., surface charge, folding energy) 21,22 and extrinsic solution characteristics (e.g., pH, excipient, concentration, surface chemistry) 23,24 could be regulated to minimize aggregation.”
Click, Compute, Create: A Review of Web‐based Tools for Enzyme Engineering
Tripp, A., Braun, M., Wieser, F., Oberdorfer, G., & Lechner, H. (2024) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202400092 · Cited by 17
Yin, T., Ramon, A., Greenig, M., Sormanni, P., & D'adamio, L. (2025) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2025.2498164 · Cited by 13
Self-citationBacillus subtilis HelD, an RNA Polymerase Interacting Helicase, Forms Amyloid-Like Fibrils
Kaur, G., Kapoor, S., & Thakur, K. G. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01934 · Cited by 14
Sebastiao, M., Quittot, N., Marcotte, I., & Bourgault, S. (2019) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.8b01206 · Cited by 14
Sarma, S., Herrera, S. M., Xiao, X., Hudalla, G. A., & Hall, C. K. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c03918 · Cited by 12
“The CamSol method was developed in the Vendruscolo lab 31,32 and is a sequence-based approach for predicting protein/peptide solubility.”
MethodBemporad, F., & Ramazzotti, M. (2016) · International review of cytology · doi:10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.08.008 · Cited by 14
Zhou, C., Liu, S., & Zhang, S. (2019) · Analytical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ab.2019.113362 · Cited by 14
Achour, A., Broggini, L., Han, X. Y., Sun, R., Santambrogio, C., Buratto, J., Visentin, C., Barbiroli, A. G., Luca, C. M. G. D., Sormanni, P., et al. (2019) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.15046 · Cited by 14
“A sequence-based analysis of the solubility – and in turn aggregation propensity – of mb2m or hb2m using CamSol [22] revealed that the overall aggregation propensity is comparable along the two protein sequences except for the regions corresponding to amino acid residues 60–70 (E strand) and 80–90 (F, G strands).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationA novel deletion in the C-terminal region of HSPB8 in a family with rimmed vacuolar myopathy
Inoue-Shibui, A., Niihori, T., Kobayashi, M., Suzuki, N., Izumi, R., Warita, H., Hara, K., Shirota, M., Funayama, R., Nakayama, K., et al. (2021) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s10038-021-00916-y · Cited by 14
Resurrecting Golgi proteins to grasp Golgi ribbon formation and self-association under stress
Mendes, L. F. S., Batista, M. R. B., Kava, E., Bleicher, L., Micheletto, M. C., & Costa-Filho, A. J. (2022) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.173 · Cited by 13
Desai, P. G., Garidel, P., Gbormittah, F. O., Kamen, D. E., Mills, B. J., Narasimhan, C. N., Singh, S. N., Stokes, E. S. E., & Walsh, E. (2022) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2022.11.020 · Cited by 13
Badaczewska-Dawid, A. E., Kuriata, A., Pintado-Grima, C., García-Pardo, J., Burdukiewicz, M., Iglesias, V., Kmiecik, S., & Ventura, S. (2023) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkad942 · Cited by 12
“In response to these challenges, prediction methods that use the spatial information to identify structural aggregation-prone regions (STAPs) in proteins were introduced ( 10–13 ).”
BackgroundRamon, A., Ni, M., Predeina, O., Gaffey, R., Kunz, P., Onuoha, S., & Sormanni, P. (2025) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2024.2442750 · Cited by 13
“36 The intrinsic score is solely computed on the amino acid sequence, while the structurally corrected score corrects for residue solvent exposure and proximity in the modeled structure.”
Self-citationBiophysical characterization of intrinsically disordered human Golgi matrix protein GRASP65
Reddy, S. T., Uversky, V. N., & Costa-Filho, A. J. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.08.126 · Cited by 11
CARs-DB: A Database of Cryptic Amyloidogenic Regions in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Pintado‐Grima, C., Bárcenas, O., Manglano-Artuñedo, Z., Vilaça, R., Macedo‐Ribeiro, S., Pallarès, I., Santos, J., & Ventura, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.882160 · Cited by 13
Liu, Z., Zhang, R., Zhang, W., & Xu, Y. (2022) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2022.2054770 · Cited by 13
Horváth, A., Vendruscolo, M., & Fuxreiter, M. (2022) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00499 · Cited by 13
Self-citationOliver, C., & Timson, D. J. (2017) · European Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2017.03.008 · Cited by 13
“php/camsolintrinsic) also makes predictions about the likely soluble or aggregated state of a protein, returning an intrinsic solubility score; the higher this score, the more soluble the protein (Sormanni et al., 2015).”
BackgroundA mutant of hydrophobin HGFI tuning the self-assembly behaviour and biosurfactant activity
Wang, X., Song, D., Wang, B., Yang, J., Ge, L., Zhao, L., Xu, H., & Qiao, M. (2017) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-017-8577-x · Cited by 13
Fortier, M., Côté‐Cyr, M., Nguyen, V., Babych, M., Nguyen, P. T., Gaudreault, R., & Bourgault, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences · doi:10.3389/fmolb.2022.1017336 · Cited by 12
“, 2007), CamSol (Sormanni et al., 2015) and TANGO (Fernandez-Escamilla et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialZhao, W., Luo, X., Tong, F., Zheng, X., Li, J., Zhao, G., & Zhao, D. (2023) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2023.11.041 · Cited by 13
“…biology tools to calculate important properties of the generated antibodies, including the isoelectric point, hydrophobicity, and specific developability metrics such as Aggregation Propensity [50], CamSol Score [51], Heavy OASis Percentile [52], and Average NetMHCIIpan Percentage [53].”
BackgroundAdvances in Zero‐Shot Prediction‐Guided Enzyme Engineering Using Machine Learning
Liu, C., Wu, J., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Zheng, Y., Liu, L., & Zhao, J. B. (2024) · ChemCatChem · doi:10.1002/cctc.202401542 · Cited by 15
A Practical Guide to Computational Tools for Engineering Biocatalytic Properties
Vega, A., Planas, A., & Biarnés, X. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26030980 · Cited by 12
“The CamSol [200] web server consists of three algorithms that can be used individually for specific tasks or together to rationally design protein variants with enhanced solubility: (i) a sequence-based predictor of intrinsic solubility profiles and solubility scores, (ii) an algorithm exploiting…”
InfluentialSantambrogio, A., Horne, R. I., Metrick, M. A., Gallagher, N. C. T., Brotzakis, Z. F., Rinauro, D. J., Vourkou, E., Papanikolopoulou, K., Skoulakis, E. M. C., Linse, S. S., et al. (2025) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5c12812 · Cited by 12
“20,24 Here we demonstrated that a kinetic analysis of AD tau-seeded aggregation could enhance the potency of small molecule aggregation inhibitors initially identified through docking to an exposed hydrophobic motif on the AD tau amyloid fibril.”
Self-citationGadhave, K., Bhardwaj, T., Uversky, V. N., Vendruscolo, M., & Giri, R. (2021) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2021.100599 · Cited by 12
Self-citationWaibl, F., Kraml, J., Fernández‐Quintero, M. L., Loeffler, J. R., & Liedl, K. R. (2022) · Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design · doi:10.1007/s10822-021-00429-y · Cited by 12
A Review of Fifteen Years Developing Computational Tools to Study Protein Aggregation
Pintado‐Grima, C., Bárcenas, O., Bartolomé-Nafría, A., Fornt‐Suñé, M., Iglesias, V., García‐Pardo, J., & Ventura, S. (2023) · Biophysica · doi:10.3390/biophysica3010001 · Cited by 12
Be positive: optimizing pramlintide from microcanonical analysis of amylin isoforms
Frigori, R. B. (2017) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c7cp04074a · Cited by 12
Sequence grammar underlying unfolding and phase separation of globular proteinsPreprint
Ruff, K. M., Choi, Y. H., Cox, D., Ormsby, A. R., Myung, Y., Ascher, D. B., Radford, S. E., Pappu, R. V., & Hatters, D. M. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.20.457073 · Cited by 12
Searching for the Pareto frontier in multi-objective protein design
Nanda, V., Belure, S. V., & Shir, O. M. (2017) · Biophysical Reviews · doi:10.1007/s12551-017-0288-0 · Cited by 11
“Tools for evaluating solubility (Sormanni et al. 2015) can be applied to optimize protein libraries for solubility and enhance the concentration and shelf life of protein formulations.”
BackgroundPrass, T. M., Garidel, P., Schäfer, L. V., & Blech, M. (2024) · mAbs · doi:10.1080/19420862.2024.2427771 · Cited by 10
“43 In addition, we assessed the spatial aggregation propensity (SAP) of both Fabs.”
Dhoriyani, J., Bergman, M. T., Hall, C. K., & You, F. (2025) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae572 · Cited by 12
“Overall, we conclude that PPO not only diversified peptide properties, but did so in a way that could have relevance to MP re-mediation (74).”
Zhao, S., Luo, J., Xu, P., Zeng, J., Yan, G., Yu, F., Qin, L., Zhang, C., Li, P., Cai, M., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.142667 · Cited by 11
Aubrey, L. D., Ninkina, N. N., Ulamec, S. M., Abramycheva, N. Y., Vasili, E., Devine, O. M., Wilkinson, M., Mackinnon, E., Limorenko, G., Walko, M., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2309700120 · Cited by 10
Sequence- and structure-based prediction of amyloidogenic regions in proteins
Bouziane, H., & Chouarfia, A. (2019) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04087-z · Cited by 11
“…alone and native structure-based approaches for the prediction of protein sol-ubility due to the very high correlation between the solubility scores and the intrinsic aggregation rates, since proteins with higher aggregation propensity have generally low solubility (Sormanni et al. 2015, 2017).”
BackgroundClingy genes: Why were genes for ribosomal proteins retained in many mitochondrial genomes?
Bertgen, L., Mühlhaus, T., & Herrmann, J. M. (2020) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/j.bbabio.2020.148275 · Cited by 9
Are casein micelles extracellular condensates formed by liquid‐liquid phase separation?
Horváth, A., Fuxreiter, M., Vendruscolo, M., Holt, C., & Carver, J. A. (2022) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.14449 · Cited by 11
Self-citationEffects of a reduced disulfide bond on aggregation properties of the human IgG1 CH3 domain
Sakurai, K., Nakahata, R., Lee, Y., Kardos, J., Ikegami, T., & Goto, Y. (2015) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2015.02.020 · Cited by 11
Flores‐León, M., Lázaro, D. F., Shvachiy, L., Kriško, A., & Outeiro, T. F. (2021) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2021.140693 · Cited by 11
“[27] The use of this method requires either the knowledge of the native structure of the target protein to calculate the structure-corrected solubility profile or the intrinsic solubility profile can be predicted based on the amino acid sequence.”
MethodMejias-Gomez, O., Braghetto, M., Sørensen, M. K. D., Madsen, A. V., Guiu, L. S., Kristensen, P. K., Pedersen, L. E., & Goletz, S. (2024) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2024.02.001 · Cited by 10
Improving the solubility of single domain antibodies using VH ‐like hallmark residues
Uto, Y., Nakakido, M., Yokoo, T., Fernandez‐Perez, J., Entzminger, K. C., Maruyama, T., Okumura, C. J., Kuroda, D., Caaveiro, J. M. M., & Tsumoto, K. (2025) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.70189 · Cited by 10
Ikenoue, T., Aprile, F. A., Sormanni, P., & Vendruscolo, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.623097 · Cited by 10
Self-citationIntegrative analysis and prediction of human R-loop binding proteins
Fournier, L.-A., Kumar, A., Smith, T., Su, E., Moksa, M., Hirst, M., & Stirling, P. C. (2022) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkac142 · Cited by 12
A protein chimera strategy supports production of a model “difficult‐to‐express” recombinant target
Hussain, H., Fisher, D. I., Roth, R. G., Abbott, W. M., Carballo‐Amador, M. A., Warwicker, J., & Dickson, A. J. (2018) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1002/1873-3468.13170 · Cited by 10
Sanagavarapu, K., Nüske, E., Nasir, I., Meisl, G., Immink, J. N., Sormanni, P., Vendruscolo, M., Knowles, T. P. J., Malmendal, A., Cabaleiro-Lago, C., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39216-z · Cited by 10
Self-citationThe uniqueness of flow in probing the aggregation behavior of clinically relevant antibodies
Willis, L. F., Kumar, A., Jain, T. S., Caffry, I., Xu, Y., Radford, S. E., Kapur, N., Vásquez, M., & Brockwell, D. J. (2020) · Engineering Reports · doi:10.1002/eng2.12147 · Cited by 8
Královičová, J., Borovská, I., Kubíčková, M., Lukavsky, P. J., & Vořechovský, I. (2020) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers12071865 · Cited by 10
“Both L140P and A231P were resistant to TEV protease cleavage (Figure S7) and were predicted to alter solubility and protein stability by CamSol [27] and the mutation cutoff scanning matrix [28], respectively (Figure S8).”
BackgroundMethodPrediction of Protein Aggregation and Amyloid Formation
Graña‐Montes, R., Pujols, J., Gómez-Picanyol, C., & Ventura, S. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-024-1069-3_7 · Cited by 10
Nicy, & Wales, D. J. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241310613 · Cited by 9
“Another predictor that can be useful to estimate amyloid formation propensity is CamSol86.”
BackgroundInfluentialWang, Y., Williams, H. D., Dikicioǧlu, D., & Dalby, P. A. (2024) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.4c00859 · Cited by 9
A review on computational models for predicting protein solubility
Pimtawong, T., Ren, J., Lee, J., Lee, H., & Na, D. (2025) · The Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.71150/jm.2408001 · Cited by 9
“Additionally, when applied to the Camsol mutation data-set, consisting of 19 proteins with 56 variants from various organisms (excluding E. coli ) (Sormanni et al., 2015), NetSolP achieved an accuracy of 0.66.”
InfluentialLee, S., Wu, J., Im, D., Hwang, G., Jeong, Y. K., Jiang, H., Lee, S. J., Jo, D. H., Goddard, W. A., Kim, J. H., et al. (2025) · Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2025.101461 · Cited by 13
Prediction of aggregation in monoclonal antibodies from molecular surface curvature
Knez, B., Erzin, L., Kos, Ž., Kuzman, D., & Ravnik, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-13527-w · Cited by 10
Shad, M., Liaqat, A., Nazir, A., Hussain, N., Yaqoob, K., Akhtar, M., & Sajjad, M. (2025) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12010-025-05366-2 · Cited by 9
“SOLpro (2007) [65], SPINE-D (2007) [66], SOLVE (2008), CamSol (2011) [67], PROSO II (2012) [68], CCSOL (2012) [69], Solubility Predictor (2014), Protein-Sol (2016) [70], DeepSol (2018), and SoluProt (2020) [71] are some of the computational tools that have been developed to predict protein…”
RP3Net: a deep learning model for predicting recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli
Tankhilevich, E., Cuesta, S. M., Barrett, I. P., Berg, C., Schiavone, L. H., & Leach, A. R. (2026) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btag003 · Cited by 11
“CamSol (Sormanni et al. 2015, Sormanni et al. 2017) is a well-established relative solubility prediction tool for libraries of similar protein sequences.”
Shin, J., Raissi, S., Phelan, P., & Bullock, P. A. (2022) · Protein Expression and Purification · doi:10.1016/j.pep.2022.106196 · Cited by 9
Analysis of Sheep and Goat IAPP Provides Insight into IAPP Amyloidogenicity and Cytotoxicity
Miller, M. E. T., Li, M., Baghai, A., Peetz, V. H., Zhyvoloup, A., & Raleigh, D. P. (2022) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00470 · Cited by 9
Amyloid β accelerates age-related proteome-wide protein insolubility
Anderton, E., Chamoli, M., Bhaumik, D., King, C. D., Xie, X., Foulger, A., Andersen, J. K., Schilling, B., & Lithgow, G. J. (2024) · GeroScience · doi:10.1007/s11357-024-01169-1 · Cited by 10
“Similarly, using the Cam-Sol solubility prediction score [47] we found that the CIP had a significantly higher median solubility prediction than the reference proteome (Fig.”
MethodDissecting the Structural Organization of Multiprotein Amyloid Aggregates Using a Bottom-Up Approach
Chaudhary, H., Meister, S. W., Zetterberg, H., Löfblom, J., & Lendel, C. (2020) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.0c00110 · Cited by 9
“Far-UV CD spectroscopy of the Aβ(1-40) and Aβ(1-42) amyloid fibril samples was measured with 1:8 dilution in sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.”
InfluentialSUMO: In Silico Sequence Assessment Using Multiple Optimization Parameters
Evers, A., Malhotra, S., Bolick, W.-G., Najafian, A., Borisovska, M., Warszawski, S., Fomekong‐Nanfack, Y., Kühn, D., Rippmann, F., Crespo, A., et al. (2023) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3279-6_22 · Cited by 9
Evans, J. R., Gustavsson, E. K., Doykov, I., Murphy, D. P., Virdi, G. S., Lachica, J., Röntgen, A., Murtada, M. H., Pang, C. W., Macpherson, H. L., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.30.596437 · Cited by 9
“33,34 Residue-specific solubility profiles were plotted using GraphPad Prism Version 10.2.0, with higher values indicating greater predicted solubility, and lower values indicating poorer predicted solubility, respectively.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAggregation Limiting Cell-Penetrating Peptides Derived from Protein Signal Sequences
Porosk, L., Härk, H. H., Bicev, R. N., Gaidutšik, I., Nebogatova, J., Armolik, E.-J., Arukuusk, P., da Silva, E. R., & Langel, Ü. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24054277 · Cited by 8
“html (accessed on 1 September 2021) [52,53] and Peptide Property Calculator ver 3.”
BackgroundAA amyloidosis in vertebrates: epidemiology, pathology and molecular aspects
Moccia, V., Tucciarone, C. M., Garutti, S., Milazzo, M., Ferri, F., Palizzotto, C., Mazza, M., Basset, M., Zini, E., Ricagno, S., et al. (2024) · Amyloid · doi:10.1080/13506129.2024.2417219 · Cited by 8
Elucidating the regulatory mechanism of Swi1 prion in global transcription and stress responses
Du, Z., Regan, J. M., Bartom, E. T., Wu, W.-S., Zhang, L., Goncharoff, D. K., & Li, L. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-77993-0 · Cited by 8
Rebeaud, M. E., Mallik, S., Goloubinoff, P., & Tawfik, D. S. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.08.140319 · Cited by 7
solPredict: Antibody Apparent Solubility Prediction from Sequence by Transfer LearningPreprint
Feng, J., Jiang, M., Shih, J., & Chai, Q. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.12.07.471655 · Cited by 8
Li, G., Zhang, N., & Fan, L. (2025) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c09688 · Cited by 7
Improvement of the Antimicrobial Peptide Activity by Means of Chitosan‐Based Nanoparticles
Gálvez-Rodríguez, S., Asensio‐Calavia, P., Otazo‐Pérez, A., Abad‐Chico, P., de la Lastra, J. M. P., & Pérez‐Herrero, E. (2025) · Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1002/biot.70062 · Cited by 7
Generation of bispecific antibodies by structure-guided redesign of IgG constant regions
Iwasaki, Y. W., Tharakaraman, K., Subramanian, V., Khongmanee, A., Hatas, A., Fleischer, E., Rurak, T. T., Ngok-ngam, P., Tit-oon, P., Ruchirawat, M., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.1063002 · Cited by 7
“CamSol has been successfully employed for rational design of protein variants having improved solubility (26).”
MethodInfluentialAmyloid Aggregation Is Potently Slowed Down by Osmolytes Due to Compaction of Partially Folded State
Garfagnini, T., Bemporad, F., Harries, D., Chiti, F., & Friedler, A. (2023) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2023.168281 · Cited by 7
Extensive antibody search with whole spectrum black-box optimization
Tučs, A., Ito, T., Kurumida, Y., Kawada, S., Nakazawa, H., Saitō, Y., Umetsu, M., & Tsuda, K. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-51095-z · Cited by 8
Tosstorff, A., Peters, G. H. J., & Winter, G. (2020) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.01.020 · Cited by 7
“Identification of aggregation prone regions Three different methods were used to identify aggregation prone regions on the surface of Interferonalpha-2A: Aggrescan3D[32], AggScore[33] and CamSol[34].”
MethodInfluentialIndrakumar, S., Zalar, M., Tschammer, N., Pohl, C., Nørgaard, A., Streicher, W. W., Harris, P., Golovanov, A. P., & Peters, G. H. J. (2020) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.10.015 · Cited by 7
“The residue is colored red if it is predicted as aggregation prone by any one of the webservers (AGGRESCAN3D[26], CAMSOL[27], CSSP[43]).”
MethodInfluentialAggidis, A., Chatterjee, S., Townsend, D. J., Fullwood, N. J., Ortega, E. R., Tarutani, A., Hasegawa, M., Lucas, H., Mudher, A. K., & Allsop, D. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.06.04.447069 · Cited by 9
“The peptide (306)VQIVYK(311) was favoured as it is present in all Tau isoforms and shares similarity to (275)VQIINK(280) which might promote binding to both targets [45].”
BackgroundTomii, K. (2018) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.20266-5 · Cited by 7
M., D. D. V., Arumugam, N., Almansour, A. I., Sivaramakrishnan, V., & Kanchi, S. (2024) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.132247 · Cited by 7
AggNet : Advancing protein aggregation analysis through deep learning and protein language model
He, W., Xu, X., Li, H., Zhou, J., & Gao, X. (2025) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.70031 · Cited by 6
Parkinson, J., Hard, R. L., Ko, Y. S., & Wang, W. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202504350 · Cited by 7
A novel alpha-synuclein G14R missense variant is associated with atypical neuropathological features
Brücke, C., Al‐Azzani, M., Ramalingam, N., Ramón, M., Sousa, R. L., Buratti, F. A., Zech, M., Sicking, K., Amaral, L., Gelpí, E., et al. (2025) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-025-00889-y · Cited by 10
“An additional positive charge is expected to increase G14R solubility and arginine has been used in several studies to suppress aggregation [83–87].”
Two physics‐based models for pH ‐dependent calculations of protein solubility
Spassov, V. Z., Kemmish, H., & Yan, L. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4299 · Cited by 5
“The ESM method is implemented in the existing Calculate Protein Formulation Properties Discovery Studio protocol, along with calculations of the developability index,3 DI and viscosity scores.7 Although our structurebased approach requires protein 3D structures as input to the calculation, the results are more accurat…”
MethodKaraiyan, P., Chang, C. C. H., Chan, E., Tey, B. T., Ramanan, R. N., & Ooi, C. W. (2022) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-022-12008-8 · Cited by 6
“Apart from bioinformatic tools involving the information at gene level, numerous machine learningbased methods have been developed to predict the solubility of protein, based on its amino acid sequence (Agostini et al. 2014; Habibi et al. 2014; Hebditch et al. 2017; Hon et al. 2021; Khurana et al. 2018; Madani et al.…”
MethodPredicting small molecules solubility on endpoint devices using deep ensemble neural networks
Ramos, M. C., & White, A. D. (2024) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d3dd00217a · Cited by 6
“[1] The solubility of molecules is essential in many chemistry-related fields, including drug development[2–5], protein design[6], chemical[7, 8] and separation[9] processes.”
BackgroundGhafoor, H., Asim, M. N., Ibrahim, M. A., & Dengel, A. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36041 · Cited by 6
“In the classification category, predictors analyze amino acids distribution patterns and utilize these patterns to categorize proteins into either soluble or insoluble classes [95,106].”
InfluentialLi, N., Liu, X., Bian, C., Ren, C., Hu, Q., Yang, Z., Xiao, L., & Guan, T. (2024) · Talanta · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126827 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Sormanni, P., Aprile, F. A., & Vendruscolo, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Vendruscolo, Michele
- Venue
- Journal of Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-01
- Volume
- 427
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 478-490
- ISSN
- 0022-2836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2103083136
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 52 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Molecular Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein solubility, rational protein design, site-directed mutagenesis, nanobodies, amyloid-beta, Alzheimer's disease, soluble protein production, native state stability
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acids, Circular Dichroism, Cloning, Molecular, Computer Simulation, Escherichia coli, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Recombinant Proteins, Solubility, Protein Engineering, Molecular Structure, Mutant Proteins, Chemical Phenomena
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review