Models of accuracy in repeated-measures designs
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Generalized linear mixed-effects probit/logit models are more appropriate than ANOVA or t-test on participant averages for analyzing binary accuracy data.
“As a result, there is a growing body of literature that argues it is more appropriate to use generalized linear mixed-effects probit/logit models to analyze these types of accuracy data (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008; Quené and van den Bergh, 2008; Song et al., 2017).”
From Cognitive Mapping Without Vision: Comparing Wayfinding Performance After Learning From Digital Touchscreen-Based Multimodal Maps vs. Embossed Tactile Overlays (2020) · cites this paper as Dixon, 2008
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,819 · see citing works
Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models
LIANG, K.-Y., & ZEGER, S. L. (1986) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/73.1.13 · Cited by 18,550 · see citing works
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Akaike, H. (1998) · Springer series in statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15 · Cited by 18,384 · see citing works
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
Tufte, E. R., Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1979) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286442 · Cited by 5,214 · see citing works
Regression Models for Ordinal Data
McCullagh, P. (1980) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1980.tb01109.x · Cited by 4,453 · see citing works
Luce, R. (1959) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911299 · Cited by 2,603 · see citing works
The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables
Simpson, E. H. (1951) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00088.x · Cited by 2,301 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In Simpson’s paradox (Simpson, 1951), for example, the pattern of overall means may not reflect the pattern observed in individual conditions or with individual subjects.”
BackgroundAnalyzing linguistic data : a practical introduction to statistics using R
Baayen, R. H. (2008) · Cited by 2,070 · see citing works
Handbook of mathematical psychology: I.
Luce, R. D., Bush, R. R., & Galanter, E. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,996 · see citing works
Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4230-7 · Cited by 1,143 · see citing works
Introductory Statistics with R
Dalgaard, P. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/b97671 · Cited by 734 · see citing works
Luce, R. D. (1963) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling
Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210812 · Cited by 619 · see citing works
Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix
Townsend, J. T. (1971) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03213026 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
A Handbook of Statistical Analyses using R
Hothorn, T., & Everitt, B. J. (2014) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/b17081 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
A Handbook of Statistical Analyses using R
Everitt, B., & Hothorn, T. (2006) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781420010657 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception
McClelland, J. L. (1991) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(91)90002-6 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Introductory Statistics With R
Sandry, T. D. (2003) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2003.s779 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model
Twilley, L. C., & Dixon, P. (2000) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210725 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationStatistics for Psychologists: An Intermediate Course
Everitt, B. J. (2001) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Context and homograph meaning resolution.
Dixon, P. A., & Twilley, L. C. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/h0087321 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationStatistics for Psychologists: An Intermediate Course
Rowell, G. H. (2002) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1198/tas.2002.s3 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cole, T. (1998) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980228)17:4
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 · Cited by 10,328 · see citing works
“Furthermore, none of the LMEM articles in the JML special issue (Baayen et al., 2008; Barr, 2008; Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008; Mirman, Dixon, & Magnuson, 2008; Quené & van den Bergh, 2008) set a”
Dicks, M., Button, C., & Davids, K. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.3.706 · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Single-Trial Regression Elucidates the Role of Prefrontal Theta Oscillations in Response Conflict
Cohen, M. X., & Cavanagh, J. F. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00030 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta‐analysis
Vrij, A., Fisher, R. P., & Blank, H. (2015) · Legal and Criminological Psychology · doi:10.1111/lcrp.12088 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
“Specifically, measures of effect size for continuous data (such as Cohen’s d) are suboptimal for the analysis of accuracy data that are based on categorical veracity judgments (true vs. false; Dixon, 2008).”
MethodMagezi, D. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00002 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
“…for continuous response variables from a normally distributed population, mixed-effects models can also be used for categorical response variables (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008). lme4 includes the function glmer which can be used for count data (Poisson distribution), binary/proportion data…”
Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives
Harris, J. A., & Potts, C. (2009) · Linguistics and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10988-010-9070-5 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Barr, D. J. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.005 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
Review of Baayen (2008): Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R.
Frank, A. F., & Jaeger, T. F. (2010) · Functions of Language · doi:10.1075/fol.17.1.08fra · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Kantola, L., & van Gompel, R. V. (2011) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0016-5 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
“Because our data were categorical, we used mixed logit models, which are designed for binomially distributed data (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
MethodKootstra, G., van Hell, J. V., & Dijkstra, T. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.006 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“…switch position predescription or mid-description; verb language English or Dutch), logistic regression makes it possible to perform the analyses directly on the participants’ actual responses; it does not require aggregation to a mean response per condition (see also Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
BackgroundEffects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments
Bicknell, K., Elman, J. L., Hare, M. L., McRae, K., & Marta Kutas, A. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.004 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
“Because of recent concerns in the literature about the appropriateness of analyses of variance in psycholinguistics (Baayen, 2004; Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008), we performed generalized linear mixed-effects regression (Breslow & Clayton, 1993) as well as ANOVAs.”
Impairing the useful field of view in natural scenes: Tunnel vision versus general interference
Ringer, R. V., Throneburg, Z., Johnson, A. P., Kramer, A. F., & Loschky, L. C. (2016) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/16.2.7 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
“…traditional measures of sensitivity (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005); however, a major benefit of fitting the data to a generalized linear mixed model for signal detection is that such modeling is robust to finding differences between values at extreme ends of the binomial distribution (Dixon, 2008).”
BackgroundBrouwer, S. M., Engen, K. J. V., Calandruccio, L., & Bradlow, A. R. (2012) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.3675943 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
“We used a logistic linking function to deal with the categorical nature of the dependent variable ([0,1]; cf., Dixon, 2008).”
MethodPhonetic convergence across multiple measures and model talkers
Pardo, J. S., Urmanche, A. A., Wilman, S., & Wiener, J. (2016) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1226-0 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
“…(2) binomial/logistic mixed-effects regression permits a more appropriate handling of binary data than does percent correct (see Barr et al., 2013; Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008); and (3) like ordinary regression, mixed-effects regression permits analysis of continuous as well as categorical…”
MethodRethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account
Adani, F. (2009) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000909990250 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages
Dingemanse, M., Schuerman, W. L., Reinisch, E., Tufvesson, S., & Holger Mitterer, A. (2016) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2016.0034 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“First, we deal with the categorical nature of the dependent variable (using ANOVAs with untransformed proportions would be problematic; see Dixon 2008, Jaeger 2008).”
MethodMurayama, K., Sakaki, M., Yan, V. X., & Smith, G. M. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0036914 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Phonetic convergence in shadowed speech: The relation between acoustic and perceptual measures
Pardo, J. S., Jordan, K., Mallari, R., Scanlon, C. M., & Lewandowski, E. M. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.06.002 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Kgolo-Lotshwao, N. N., & Eisenbeiß, S. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1053813 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
“-incorrect/timed-out distinction (see Barr et al., 2013; Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
Testing the construct validity of competing measurement approaches to probed mind-wandering reports
Kane, M. J., Smeekens, B. A., Meier, M. E., Welhaf, M. S., & Phillips, N. E. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01557-x · Cited by 100 · see citing works
“We analyzed accuracy using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) in the lme4 package (Bates et al., 2015) to account for the binomial distribution of trial-level accuracy (Dixon, 2008).”
MethodA Specificity Principle of Memory: Evidence From Aging and Associative Memory
Greene, N. R., & Naveh‐Benjamin, M. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620901760 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“…(0 = short, 1 = long) differences in response accuracy (0 = incorrect, 1 = correct) with hierarchical Bayesian binomial logistic regression models, a more appropriate method of analyzing data on the proportion of correct responses than analysis of variance on aggregated proportions (Dixon, 2008).”
MethodMatthews, D. E., Butcher, J., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2012) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01181.x · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“…complexity of verbal descriptions varied according to age, time, feedback condition, and sticker array size, we fitted a mixed-effects logistic regression model to the data using Laplace approximation (Baayen, 2008; Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Dixon, 2008; Gelman & Hill, 2007; Jaeger, 2008).”
MethodDisambiguating Information and Memory Resources in Children’s Processing of Italian Relative Clauses
Arosio, F., Guasti, M. T., & Stucchi, N. A. (2010) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-010-9160-0 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Visual Search Strategy in Judo Fighters during the Execution of the First Grip
Piras, A., Pierantozzi, E., & Squatrito, S. (2014) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1260/1747-9541.9.1.185 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“In the present study, a mixed-model was considered advantageous as it provides a more flexible method of dealing with missing data [27] as well as accounting for any variability in a participant’s performance across repeated conditions [28].”
MethodDíaz, B., Holger Mitterer, A., Broersma, M., & Sebastián‐Gallés, N. (2012) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.05.005 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
“mation of identification results in data analysis (Dixon, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodAttention meets binding: Only attended distractors are used for the retrieval of event files
Moeller, B., & Frings, C. (2014) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0648-9 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Isolating exogenous and endogenous modes of temporal attention.
Lawrence, M. A., & Klein, R. M. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0029023 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Second language acquisition of Mandarin Chinese vocabulary: context of learning effects
Lan, Y., Fang, S.-Y., Legault, J., & Li, P. (2015) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9380-y · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“…data averaging and offers the possibility to examine the item effect longitudinally (Baayen et al. 2008); it has better generalization performance than traditional methods such as ANOVA (Barr et al. 2013); and finally, it has greater power to detect effects as compared with ANOVA (Dixon 2008).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDual-task costs in working memory: An adversarial collaboration.
Doherty, J. M., Belletier, C., Rhodes, S., Graham, A. J., Barrouillet, P., Camos, V., Cowan, N., Naveh‐Benjamin, M., & Logie, R. H. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000668 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“To avoid the potential pitfalls of conventional methods (e.g., ANOVA and other normal models can lead to spurious results, particularly in the interpretation of interaction effects Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008), data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed effects models (Bolker et al., 2009).”
Schut, M. J., der Stoep, N. V., Postma, A., & der Stigchel, S. V. (2017) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/17.6.15 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
“This is good practice for binomial data, as the model never reaches mean values below 0 or above 1 (Dixon, 2008).”
False belief and counterfactual reasoning in a social environment
Hoeck, N. V., Begtas, E., Steen, J., Kestemont, J., Vandekerckhove, M. M. P., & Overwalle, F. V. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.043 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“As has been pointed out by Dixon (2008), the assumption of normality (in ANOVA) might often not be met when dealing with proportions, especially when accuracy percentages reach ceiling levels (as is the case here).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInput effects across domains: The case of Greek subjects in child heritage language
Daskalaki, E., Chondrogianni, V., Blom, E., Argyri, F., & Paradis, J. (2018) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658318787231 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
“The mixed effects logistic regression allows using a larger number of data-points to include a more complete and theoretically-motivated random effects structure: specifically, one that specifies a random intercept for subject and a random slope for condition by subject (Barr et al., 2013; Dixon, 2008).”
MethodMeasuring the Perceived Social Intelligence of Robots
Barchard, K. A., Lapping-Carr, L. R., Westfall, R. S., Fink-Armold, A., Banisetty, S. B., & Feil-Seifer, D. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3415139 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“Specifically, we used the lme4 package [Bates et al. 2012 ] in R to complete linear mixed effects analyses with random intercepts for each participant (as recommended by Dixon [ 2008 ]), using maximum likelihood estimation (as recommended by Luke [ 2016 ]).”
MethodBilingual perceptual benefits of experience with a heritage language
Chang, C. B. (2014) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728914000261 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“…logistic regression model of http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 09 Jul 2016 IP address: 128.197.26.12 the likelihood of accuracy (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008), starting with random-effect terms for Participant and Item and adding fixed-effect terms for Final (stop, sonorant;…”
BackgroundInfluentialWord accents and morphology—ERPs of Swedish word processing
Roll, M., Horne, M. A., & Lindgren, M. P. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.020 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“5 Mixed logit models have proven to give more accurate results for proportional data than ANOVA (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008), which is used in the present study for simplicity.”
Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: Global versus local indices of executive control.
Meier, M. E., & Kane, M. J. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0029200 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Fawcett, J. M., Lawrence, M. A., & Taylor, T. L. (2016) · Journal of experimental psychology. General · doi:10.1037/xge0000128 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
“Theorists have advised against the analysis of proportions in this manner, instead recommending the use of statistical models that treat the raw binary scores as arising from a binomial distribution (e.g., Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
BackgroundMethodThe development of and interaction among alerting, orienting, and executive attention in children
Mullane, J. C., Lawrence, M. A., Corkum, P. V., Klein, R. M., & McLaughlin, E. N. (2014) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2014.981252 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Recently, however, it has been recognized (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008) that the traditional approach achieves inferior inference relative to those like GLMM, which can handle error data in its native, binomial format.”
BackgroundInterference in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions
Guasti, M. T., Branchini, C., & Arosio, F. (2011) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716411000324 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“…analyses are not met as the dependent variable, response accuracy, is not continuous, but discrete, and the distribution of the responses is not normal (being either correct or incorrect) and “this can lead to averaging artefacts and distortion in the means, standard errors” (Dixon, 2008, p. 1).”
BackgroundGollan, T. H., Salmon, D. P., Montoya, R. I., & Pena, E. D. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.038 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“However, some individual participants' means were outside the range considered ideal for avoiding scaling artifacts with accuracy data (floor/ceiling effects are less likely in data sets with values that range between 25-75% correct; Dixon, 2008).”
After-effects of 10 Hz tACS over the prefrontal cortex on phonological word decisions
Moliadze, V., Sierau, L., Lyzhko, E., Stenner, T., Werchowski, M., Siniatchkin, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2019) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2019.06.021 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“While task accuracy is easy to interpret, AN OVAs are not well suited to compare this data (43).”
Examining the Testing Effect in University Teaching: Retrievability and Question Format Matter
Greving, S., & Richter, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02412 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
“We estimated generalized linear mixed effect models (GLMMs) with a logit-link function (Dixon, 2008) with the R package lme4 (Bates et al.”
MethodImplicit training of nonnative speech stimuli.
Vlahou, E. L., Protopapas, A., & Seitz, A. R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0025014 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Ricketts, J., Davies, R. A. I., Masterson, J., Stuart, M., & Duff, F. J. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.013 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“This approach allowed us to avoid the problems associated with analyzing dichotomous outcomes using linear models (discussed by, e.g., Baayen, 2008; Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
MethodThematic emphasis in language production
Vernice, M., Pickering, M., & Hartsuiker, R. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.572468 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Because the data of this norming study (and of the subsequent experiments) are categorical, we analysed them with logit mixed effects models (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
MethodDelayed Anticipatory Spoken Language Processing in Adults with Dyslexia—Evidence from Eye‐tracking
Huettig, F., & Brouwer, S. M. (2015) · Dyslexia · doi:10.1002/dys.1497 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Speech reductions change the dynamics of competition during spoken word recognition
Brouwer, S. M., Holger Mitterer, A., & Huettig, F. (2011) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.555268 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
“A logistic linking function was used for the error patterns (cf. Dixon, 2008).”
MethodRhodes, S., Graham, A. J., Doherty, J. M., Belletier, C., Naveh‐Benjamin, M., Cowan, N., Camos, V., Barrouillet, P., & Logie, R. H. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000539 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
“, arcsine square root), is liable to producing spurious interactions (Dixon, 2008), which is of particular concern in research on cognitive aging (Salthouse, 2000).”
Drawing improves memory: The importance of multimodal encoding context
Wammes, J. D., Jonker, T. R., & Fernandes, M. A. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.024 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Arosio, F., Yatsushiro, K., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2012) · Language Learning and Development · doi:10.1080/15475441.2011.634691 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“It has recently been shown that linear models such as ANOVAs lead to artefacts and distortions in means and standard errors when used with discrete dichotomic dependent variables (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
MethodGiudice, N. A., Guenther, B. A., Jensen, N. A., & Haase, K. N. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00087 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“As a result, there is a growing body of literature that argues it is more appropriate to use generalized linear mixed-effects probit/logit models to analyze these types of accuracy data (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008; Quené and van den Bergh, 2008; Song et al., 2017).”
BackgroundJudging the plausibility of arguments in scientific texts: a student–scientist comparison
von der Mühlen, S., Richter, T., Schmid, S., Schmidt, E. M., & Berthold, K. (2015) · Thinking & Reasoning · doi:10.1080/13546783.2015.1127289 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
“Technically, we estimated Generalised Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) with a logit link function (Dixon, 2008) and random effects (random 238 S.”
MethodRapid adaptation to foreign-accented speech and its transfer to an unfamiliar talker
Xie, X., Weatherholtz, K., Bainton, L., Rowe, E., Burchill, Z., Liu, L. L., & Jaeger, T. F. (2018) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5027410 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
“For example, the word matching task employed in both the present study and CG04 results in very low error rates, reducing the power to detect effects on accuracy (for relevant power simulations, see Dixon, 2008).”
MethodGuasti, M. T., Papagno, C., Vernice, M., Cecchetto, C., Giuliani, A., & Burdo, S. (2012) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716412000562 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Working memory as a moderator of training and transfer of analogical reasoning in children
Stevenson, C. E., Heiser, W. J., & Resing, W. C. M. (2013) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.02.001 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Wijayasiri, P., Hartley, D. E. H., & Wiggins, I. M. (2017) · Hearing Research · doi:10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.010 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Creating a recollection-based memory through drawing.
Wammes, J. D., Meade, M. E., & Fernandes, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000445 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“Simulations have suggested that for proportional data, or indeed any data with a binary outcome, multilevel logistic regression may be a superior and less biased technique for analysis than standard analyses of variance (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
MethodDiamanti, V., BENAKI, A., Mouzaki, A., Ralli, A. M., Antoniou, F., PAPAIOANNOU, S., & Protopapas, A. (2017) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716417000522 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“In this way, variations in accuracy were modeled as differences in log odds, which do not suffer from the limited scale of 0–1 and are therefore relatively robust to the unavoidable floor and ceiling effects observed near the endpoints of accuracy scales (Dixon, 2008).”
BackgroundCognitive control in bilinguals: Effects of language experience and individual variability
Bonfieni, M., Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Sorace, A. (2019) · Bilingualism Language and Cognition · doi:10.1017/s1366728918001086 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“The motivation to do so was to implement a better model of accuracy data and to use a larger number of data-points to include a more complete and theoretically motivated random effects structure: specifically, one that specifies a random intercept for subject and a random slope for condition by subject (Barr, Levy, Sc…”
MethodKellman, P. J., Mnookin, J. L., Erlikhman, G., Garrigan, P., Ghose, T., Mettler, E. W., Charlton, D., & Dror, I. E. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094617 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“item differences by fitting data from individual trials instead of aggregating across all presentations of an item [33], [34].”
BackgroundEmpirical logit analysis is not logistic regression
Donnelly, S., & Verkuilen, J. (2016) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.005 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
“Indeed, a special issue of the Journal of Memory and Language contained several excellent papers illustrating the negative consequences of using linear regression and related techniques to analyze proportions (Barr, 2008; Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008; Mirman, Dixon, & Magnuson, 2008).”
BackgroundRandom effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximalPreprint
Barr, D. J., Lévy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/39mhs · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Plackett, R., Kassianos, A. P., Kambouri, M. A., Kay, N., Mylan, S., Hopwood, J., Schartau, P., Gray, S., Timmis, J., Bennett, S., et al. (2020) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02168-4 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Processing let alone coordination in silent reading
Harris, J. A. (2015) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2015.10.008 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
The production of relative clauses by Italian cochlear-implanted and hearing children
Volpato, F., & Vernice, M. (2013) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.010 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Following Dixon (2008) and Jaeger (2008), a repeated-measure logistic regression analysis was carried out in order to analyze accuracy data, using the statistical software R (R Development Core Team, 2008).11 ger (2008) demonstrated that, when data are categorical (binomially distributed), mixed…”
MethodPihlaja, M., Failla, L., Peräkylä, J., & Hartikainen, K. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.561780 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Errors were analyzed with a generalized mixed-effects logistic regression (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
MethodLetters don’t matter: No effect of orthography on the perception of conversational speech
Holger Mitterer, A., & Reinisch, E. (2015) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2015.08.005 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“Note, however, that a percentage scale should not be treated as an interval scale (Dixon, 2008; cf. Jaeger, 2008), since differences in raw percentages close to floor or ceiling are more meaningful than in the middle range.”
BackgroundDiamanti, V., Goulandris, N., Campbell, R., & Protopapas, A. (2017) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1338291 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“These problems are alleviated to some extent in binomial approaches via transformation to a logit scale, with accuracy rescaled into an unbounded “response-strength” measure (Dixon, 2008).”
BackgroundAllophones, not phonemes in spoken-word recognition
Holger Mitterer, A., Reinisch, E., & McQueen, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.005 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Inhibitory control of the dominant language: Reversed language dominance is the tip of the iceberg
Goldrick, M., & Gollan, T. H. (2023) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2023.104410 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Fawcett, J. M., & Ozubko, J. D. (2016) · Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale · doi:10.1037/cep0000089 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
“…data are commonly aggregated into proportions prior to analysis (e.g., using an Analysis of Variance; ANOVA), simulations have consistently demonstrated the superiority of statistical models that treat the raw binary scores as arising from a binomial distribution (e.g., Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
MethodNo delays in application of perceptual learning in speech recognition: Evidence from eye tracking
Holger Mitterer, A., & Reinisch, E. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.07.002 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“The logOdds transformation helps to prevent artifacts due to the limited range of proportions and the related co-dependence of mean and variance in raw proportions (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
Berry, E. D. J., Allen, R. J., Mon-Williams, M. A., & Waterman, A. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12770 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“This approach prevents the spurious effects that can sometimes emerge from averaging over accuracy data and using analyses such as ANOVAs (Dixon, 2008).”
MethodQuach, A., Tervo‐Clemmens, B., Foran, W., Calabro, F. J., Chung, T. A., Clark, D. B., & Luna, B. (2020) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100771 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Critically, the use of generalized mixed effect models with trial-wise data reduces ceiling effects in mean accuracy distributions (Dixon, 2008).”
Sjerps, M. J., Holger Mitterer, A., & McQueen, J. M. (2011) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.044 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Diamanti, V., Goulandris, N., Stuart, M., & Campbell, R. (2013) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9447-2 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“Accuracy data were analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effects models (Baayen, 2008), fitted with binomial distributions (Dixon, 2008) via a logit transformation (Jaeger, 2008), using package lme4 (Bates, Maechler, & Bolker, 2012) in R (R Core Team, 2012).”
MethodSex differences in chronometric mental rotation with human bodies
Voyer, D., & Jansen, P. (2015) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0701-x
Kvavilashvili, L., Cockburn, J., & Kornbrot, D. E. (2012) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2012.721379 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Language Use and Linguistic Structure: Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2021
Cilibrasi, L., Hasalova, K., & Brabcova, B. (2022) · doi:10.5507/ff.22.24461489 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Matthews, D., & Bannard, C. (2010) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01091.x · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Cognates interfere with language selection but enhance monitoring in connected speech
Li, C., & Gollan, T. H. (2018) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-018-0812-x · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“We analyzed the intrusion error rates, self-corrections rates, and paragraph reading times using mixed effects regressions (linear for reading times; logistic for error rates; Dixon, 2008).”
MethodEvidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners
Chang, C. B., & Mishler, A. (2012) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.4747615 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
“4See Jaeger (2008) and Dixon (2008) for reasons to prefer mixed-effects logistic regression to analysis of variance for the analysis of accuracy data.”
BackgroundKuusinen, V., Cesnaite, E., Peräkylä, J., Ogawa, K. H., & Hartikainen, K. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00437 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Translation-priming effects on tip-of-the-tongue states
Gollan, T. H., Ferreira, V. S., Cera, C., & Flett, S. (2013) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.762457 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Ecke (2004) included a clever contrast by eliciting TOTs with definitions vs.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialGlenn, J. J., Nobles, A. L., Barnes, L. E., & Teachman, B. A. (2020) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702620906146 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“A mixed-effects method was selected because of its well-established advantages in terms of producing more accurate effect estimates and its ability to handle missing data, nonnormal outcome data, and unbalanced classes (Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
MethodThe representation of mono- and intransitive structures
van Gompel, R. V., Arai, M., & Pearson, J. (2012) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.005 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Expecting the end: Continuous expectancy ratings for tonal cadences
Sears, D. R. W., Spitzer, J., Caplin, W. E., & McAdams, S. E. (2018) · Psychology of Music · doi:10.1177/0305735618803676 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“…increasingly common because they can accommodate both continuous (Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Baayen & Milin, 2010) and binary response data (Dixon, 2008), which regularly violate assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance in repeated-measures designs (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008),…”
BackgroundVariational Bayesian mixed-effects inference for classification studies
Brodersen, K. H., Jean Daunizeau, A., Mathys, C. D., Chumbley, J. R., Buhmann, J. M., & Stephan, K. E. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.008 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“This is because a Gaussian has in fi nite support, which means it inevitably places probability mass on values below 0% and above 100% (for an alternative, see Dixon, 2008).”
BackgroundPerceptual attention as the locus of transfer to nonnative speech perception
Chang, C. B. (2018) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.003 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“Experiment 2: stop identification in English The data from Experiment 2 were analyzed by building a logistic mixed-effects regression model of the log odds of correct identification (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008) in R (R Development Core Team, 2015).”
MethodAt a Glance: Pixel Approximate Entropy as a Measure of Line Chart Complexity
Ryan, G., Mosca, A., Chang, R., & Wu, E. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2865264 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“Results and Statistical Analysis: To test our two hypotheses, we take guidance from [24] and perform a binomial logistic regression, where correctness is the outcome variable, and PAE and the baseline function are explanatory variables.”
MethodHealthy aging and visual working memory: The effect of mixing feature and conjunction changes.
Rhodes, S., Parra, M. A., Cowan, N., & Logie, R. H. (2017) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/pag0000152 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Reading comprehension of ambiguous sentences by school‐age children with autism spectrum disorder
Davidson, M. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2017) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1850 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“linear-mixed effects models using a binomial distribution better model accuracy data [Dixon, 2008].”
MethodChildren with autism align syntax in natural conversation
Hopkins, Z., Yuill, N., & Keller, B. (2015) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716414000599 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Further, ANOVAs of categorical data may produce spurious results, and are less powerful than mixed effects models (Dixon, 2008).”
ResultCournane, A., Hirzel, M., & Hacquard, V. (2023) · Language Acquisition · doi:10.1080/10489223.2023.2173074 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“The data were fitted into a generalized linear-mixed (logit) model using the maximum likelihood method (Laplace Approximation) (Baayen 2008, Dixon 2008, Matuschek et al. 2017).”
MethodBeyond arousal: Prediction error related to aversive events promotes episodic memory formation.
Kalbe, F., & Schwabe, L. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000728 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Compared with a “classic” analysis of proportions of binary recognition per condition and per participant, GLMMs have several advantages, such as increased statistical power and being less prone to spurious results (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008).”
BackgroundAnastasiou, D., & Protopapas, A. (2014) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2014.934452 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“…differences between groups and error types, trial-level data were submitted to generalized linear mixed-effects modeling for binomial distributions (Dixon, 2008) via a logit transformation (Jaeger, 2008) with maximal random structures (Barr, Levy, Scheepers, & Tily, 2013) including crossed random…”
MethodHolger Mitterer, A., & Müsseler, J. (2013) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-012-0407-8 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Bilingual Language Intrusions and Other Speech Errors in Alzheimer’s Disease
Gollan, T. H., Stasenko, A., Li, C.-C., & Salmon, D. (2017) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2017.07.007 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“But note that ANOVA is not recommended for analysis of proportional data because of the restricted range in possible means, and potential for scaling artifact in conditions that approach floor or ceiling (Dixon, 2008; Jaeger, 2008; Winer, 1971).”
Degani, T., Kreiner, H., Ataria, H., & Khateeb, F. (2019) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716419000444 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Declerck & Grainger, 2017; Elston-Güttler et al., 2005; Mercier, Pivneva, & Titone, 2016; Paulmann, Elston-Güttler, Gunter, & Kotz, 2006). These studies show that shifting from one language block to the other influences subsequent performance. For instance, Misra et al. (2012) tested Chinese–English bilinguals in a pi…”
BackgroundRepetition and the SNARC effect with one- and two-digit numbers.
Tan, S., & Dixon, P. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/a0022368 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Accuracy data was analyzed similarly but using generalized linear mixed-effects analysis using a binomial link function (Faraway, 2006; Dixon, 2008), an approach tantamount to logistic regression.”
MethodSelf-citation
- Authors
- Dixon, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Dixon, Peter
- ORCID
- Dixon, Peter
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 447-456
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055164605
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 11.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- repeated measures designs, logistic regression, conditional logistic regression, Rasch model, generalized linear mixed models, quasi-maximum likelihood estimation, response strength, effect size heterogeneity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review