The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In our study, each patient repeated about 40 trials of the same tasks. The number of trials and the individual difference among patients may have random effects on the motor performance [36].”
From Evaluation of tremor interference with control of voluntary reaching movements in patients with Parkinson's disease (2019) · cites this paper as [36]
In the citing paper
“This is the recommended analysis method for this type of data structure (Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008).”
From In an Absolute State: Elevated Use of Absolutist Words Is a Marker Specific to Anxiety, Depression, and Suicidal Ideation (2018) · cites this paper as Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1 · Cited by 11,187
Self-citationStatistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Self-citationRozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,012
Harrell (2015) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7 · Cited by 6,878
Goldstein, H. (2006) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2006.s417 · Cited by 4,960
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,946
Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis.
Kadane, J. B., Box, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1975) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2285412 · Cited by 3,853
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Bates, 2005, Fitting linear mixed models in R, R News, 5, 27
- Dien, 2004, Application of repeated measures anova to high-density erp datasets: A review and tutorial
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 · Cited by 10,328
Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 · Cited by 8,910
Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models
Jaeger, T. F. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 · Cited by 3,317
“In other words, mixed logit models can combine F1 and F2 analysis (for more detail and examples for linear mixed models, see Pinheiro & Bates, 2000; Baayen et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialResearch Methods in Applied Linguistics
(2021) · Research methods in applied linguistics · doi:10.1075/rmal · Cited by 2,782
Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R
Luke, S. G. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y · Cited by 1,704
Metadata
- Authors
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baayen, R.H.
- Venue
- Journal of Memory and Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 390-412
- ISSN
- 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125001590
- Cited by
- 8,540
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 412 · 2025: 499 · 2024: 461 · 2023: 533 · 2022: 630 · 2021: 686 · 2020: 636 · 2019: 639 · 2018: 585 · 2017: 559 · 2016: 563 · 2015: 509 · 2014: 439 · 2013: 420 · 2012: 380
- FWCI
- 183.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Keywords
- mixed models, crossed random effects, repeated measurement data, random regression models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
