Cited by 8,540Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in Measurement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

Open access

Baayen, R.H., Davidson, D.J., Bates, D.M.·2008·Journal of Memory and Language

DOI 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Statistical principles in experimental design.
Winer, B. J. (1962) · McGraw-Hill Book Company · doi:10.1037/11774-000 · Cited by 27,137
Mixed-Effects Models in Sand S-PLUS
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000) · Statistics and Computing · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0318-1 · Cited by 11,187
Self-citation
Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., Worsley, K. J., Poline, J. ‐., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020402 · Cited by 9,688
Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s574 · Cited by 9,278
Self-citation
Reviews: Lord, Frederic M., and Novick, Melvin R. (with contributions by Allan Birnbaum). Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968. xii + 568 pp. $14.95.
Rozeboom, W. W., Lord, F. M., Novick, M. R., & Birnbaum, A. (1969) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.2307/1162101 · Cited by 8,012
Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic and Ordinal Regression, and Survival Analysis
Harrell (2015) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19425-7 · Cited by 6,878
Multilevel Statistical Models
Goldstein, H. (2006) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2006.s417 · Cited by 4,960
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,946
Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis.
Kadane, J. B., Box, G. E. P., & Tiao, G. C. (1975) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2285412 · Cited by 3,853

Show all 73 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Bates, 2005, Fitting linear mixed models in R, R News, 5, 27
Dien, 2004, Application of repeated measures anova to high-density erp datasets: A review and tutorial

Sorted by citations

Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 · Cited by 10,328
Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 · Cited by 8,910
Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models
Jaeger, T. F. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 · Cited by 3,317
“In other words, mixed logit models can combine F1 and F2 analysis (for more detail and examples for linear mixed models, see Pinheiro & Bates, 2000; Baayen et al., 2008).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
(2021) · Research methods in applied linguistics · doi:10.1075/rmal · Cited by 2,782
Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R
Luke, S. G. (2017) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0809-y · Cited by 1,704
Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018) · Journal of Cognition · doi:10.5334/joc.10 · Cited by 1,420
Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2012) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0028347 · Cited by 1,236
Analyzing reaction times
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010) · International journal of psychological research · doi:10.21500/20112084.807 · Cited by 1,151
Self-citation
To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data
Lo, S., & Andrews, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01171 · Cited by 1,057
Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli.
Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000014 · Cited by 928
afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments
Singmann, H., Bolker, B. M., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben‐Shachar, M. S. (2012) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.afex · Cited by 991
The nuisance of nuisance regression: spectral misspecification in a common approach to resting-state fMRI preprocessing reintroduces noise and obscures functional connectivity
Hallquist, M. N., Hwang, K., & Luna, B. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.116 · Cited by 753
Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice
Tagliamonte, S. A., & Baayen, R. H. (2012) · Language Variation and Change · doi:10.1017/s0954394512000129 · Cited by 808
Self-citation
The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic
Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013 · Cited by 725
Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science
Meteyard, L., & Davies, R. A. I. (2020) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092 · Cited by 817
“been driven, in part, by the need to explicitly account for both subject- and itemrelated random error variance (Locker, Hoffman & Boviard, 2007; Baayen et al., 2008; Brysbaert, 2007) and part of the anxiety over model building arises when one moves from factorial ANOVA into LMMs (Boisgontier & Cheval, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Disease associations between honeybees and bumblebees as a threat to wild pollinators
Fürst, M. A., McMahon, D. P., Osborne, J. L., Paxton, R. J., & Brown, M. J. F. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12977 · Cited by 676
Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression
Barr, D. J. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.002 · Cited by 671
Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition
Bradford, M. A., Berg, B., Maynard, D. S., Wieder, W. R., & Wood, S. A. (2016) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12507 · Cited by 669
How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial
Schad, D. J., Vasishth, S., Hohenstein, S., & Kliegl, R. M. (2019) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.104038 · Cited by 74
A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers
Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007 · Cited by 625
Agreement attraction in comprehension: Representations and processes
WAGERS, M. W., Lau, E. F., & Phillips, C. (2009) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.04.002 · Cited by 639
Parafoveal processing in reading
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2011) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2 · Cited by 553
Predicting Syntax: Processing Dative Constructions in American and Australian Varieties of English
Bresnan, J. W., & Ford, M. (2010) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.0.0189 · Cited by 622
Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.
de Visser, E. J., Monfort, S. S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M. A. B., McKnight, P. E., Krueger, F., & Parasuraman, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000092 · Cited by 614
An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning
Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0023851 · Cited by 595
Self-citation
Keep Calm and Learn Multilevel Logistic Modeling: A Simplified Three-Step Procedure Using Stata, R, Mplus, and SPSS
Sommet, N., & Morselli, D. (2017) · International Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.5334/irsp.90 · Cited by 640
The generalizability crisis
Yarkoni, T. (2022) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x20001685 · Cited by 701
An Introduction to Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling in R
Brown, V. A. (2021) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920960351 · Cited by 576
Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R
Mirman, D. (2017) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315373218 · Cited by 576
Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity
Demberg, V., & Keller, F. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.008 · Cited by 606
Beyond t test and ANOVA: applications of mixed-effects models for more rigorous statistical analysis in neuroscience research
Yu, Z., Guindani, M., Grieco, S. F., Chen, L., Holmes, T. C., & Xu, X. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.030 · Cited by 563
Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R
Kumle, L., Võ, M. L.-H., & Draschkow, D. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0 · Cited by 552
“…as well as generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), are a popular and powerful choice in cognitive research, as they allow between-subject and between-item variance to be estimated simultaneously (for a discussion see Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Kliegl, Wei, Dambacher, Yan, & Zhou, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data
Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.002 · Cited by 534
Embodied attention and word learning by toddlers
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.016 · Cited by 502
Should I stay or should I switch? A cost-benefit analysis of voluntary language switching in young and aging bilinguals
Gollan, T. H., & Ferreira, V. S. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0014981 · Cited by 485
Experiments with More Than One Random Factor: Designs, Analytic Models, and Statistical Power
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2017) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033702 · Cited by 466
Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applicationsPreprint
Winter, B. (2013) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.5499 · Cited by 658
Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data
Mathôt, S., Fabius, J. H., van Heusden, E., & der Stigchel, S. V. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-017-1007-2 · Cited by 453
Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora: Experimental and modeling evidence
Dillon, B., Mishler, A., Sloggett, S., & Phillips, C. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.003 · Cited by 450
Argument Structure in Usage-Based Construction Grammar
Perek, F. (2015) · Constructional approaches to language · doi:10.1075/cal.17 · Cited by 463
Propose but verify: Fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning
Trueswell, J. C., Medina, T. N., Hafri, A., & Gleitman, L. R. (2012) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.10.001 · Cited by 398
Testing environmental and genetic effects in the presence of spatial autocorrelation
Rousset, F., & Ferdy, J. (2014) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.00566 · Cited by 397
The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words
Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4 · Cited by 391
Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems
Dingemanse, M., Roberts, S. G., Baranova, J., Blythe, J., Drew, P., Floyd, S., Gísladóttir, R. S., Kendrick, K. H., Levinson, S. C., Manrique, E., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136100 · Cited by 411
Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences.
Siyanova‐Chanturia, A., Conklin, K., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0022531 · Cited by 369
How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition
Dijkstra, T., Miwa, K., Brummelhuis, B., Sappelli, M., & Baayen, R. (2010) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.003 · Cited by 425
Self-citation
Prediction of Psilocybin Response in Healthy Volunteers
Studerus, E., Gamma, A., Kometer, M., & Vollenweider, F. X. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030800 · Cited by 369
The anova to mixed model transition
Boisgontier, M. P., & Cheval, B. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.05.034 · Cited by 382
Fractional anisotropy of water diffusion in cerebral white matter across the lifespan
Kochunov, P., Williamson, D. E., Lancaster, J., Fox, P. T., Cornell, J. E., Blangero, J., & Glahn, D. C. (2010) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.01.014 · Cited by 377
Dominant species, rather than diversity, regulates temporal stability of plant communities
Sasaki, T., & Lauenroth, W. K. (2011) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-011-1916-1 · Cited by 353
Analyzing dynamic phonetic data using generalized additive mixed modeling: A tutorial focusing on articulatory differences between L1 and L2 speakers of English
Wieling, M. (2018) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2018.03.002 · Cited by 362
“Failing to take this variability into account generally results in overcon ﬁ dent (i.e. too low) p -values (Baayen, Davidson, & Bates, 2008; Judd et al., 2012).”
Influential
Examination of gaze behaviors under in situ and video simulation task constraints reveals differences in information pickup for perception and action
Dicks, M., Button, C., & Davids, K. (2010) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/app.72.3.706 · Cited by 355
Keep it real: rethinking the primacy of experimental control in cognitive neuroscience
Nastase, S. A., Goldstein, A., & Hasson, U. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117254 · Cited by 380
“…resonates with modern statistical debates: for example, the “stimulus-as-fixed-effect” controversy in psycholinguistics (Coleman, 1964; Clark, 1973; Baayen et al., 2008), social psychology (Wells and Windschitl, 1999; Judd et al., 2012), and neuroimaging (Bedny et al., 2007; Westfall et al.,…”
Background
Fast logic?: Examining the time course assumption of dual process theory
Bagó, B., & Neys, W. D. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.014 · Cited by 380
Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech
Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. A. (2012) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006 · Cited by 345
Academic and emotional functioning in middle school: The role of implicit theories
Romero, C., Master, A., Paunesku, D., Dweck, C. S., & Gross, J. J. (2014) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0035490 · Cited by 341
The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: multi-level (and mixed-effects) models
Gries, S. Τ. (2015) · Corpora · doi:10.3366/cor.2015.0068 · Cited by 341
The Estimation of Item Response Models with the lmer Function from the lme4 Package in R
de Boeck, P. A. L., Bakker, M., Zwitser, R. J., Nivard, M. G., Hofman, A. D., Tuerlinckx, F., & Partchev, I. (2011) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v039.i12 · Cited by 339
Eye movements and word skipping during reading: Effects of word length and predictability.
Rayner, K., Slattery, T. J., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/a0020990 · Cited by 329
A comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–2010
Sprouse, J., Schütze, C. T., & Almeida, D. (2013) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.002 · Cited by 344
Contrastive focus vs. discourse-new: Evidence from phonetic prominence in English
Katz, J., & Selkirk, E. O. (2011) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2011.0076 · Cited by 326
Behavior Matching in Multimodal Communication Is Synchronized
Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A. C., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. P. J. M. H. (2012) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01269.x · Cited by 323
Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times.
Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. D. (2011) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0021765 · Cited by 343
Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation
Nielsen, K. Y. (2011) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.12.007 · Cited by 321
In an Absolute State: Elevated Use of Absolutist Words Is a Marker Specific to Anxiety, Depression, and Suicidal Ideation
Al-Mosaiwi, M., & Johnstone, T. (2018) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2167702617747074 · Cited by 304
Seeing is believing: Trustworthiness as a dynamic belief
Chang, L. J., Doll, B. B., Wout‐Frank, M. V. ‘., Frank, M. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.03.001 · Cited by 326
The influence of calibration method and eye physiology on eyetracking data quality
Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Holmqvist, K., & van de Weijer, J. (2012) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0247-4 · Cited by 348
A Test of The Relation Between Working-Memory Capacity and Syntactic Island Effects
Sprouse, J., WAGERS, M. W., & Phillips, C. (2012) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2012.0004 · Cited by 309
Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension
Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer‐Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., Wolfsthurn, S. V. G. Z., Bartolozzi, F., Kogan, V. V., Ito, A., et al. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.33468 · Cited by 375
What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs
Bosker, H. R., Pinget, A.-F., Quené, H., Sanders, T. J. M., & de Jong, N. H. (2012) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/0265532212455394 · Cited by 302
3 Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms
Ackerman, F., Blevins, J. P., & Malouf, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547548.003.0003 · Cited by 312
Iconicity in English and Spanish and Its Relation to Lexical Category and Age of Acquisition
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M., & Lupyan, G. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137147 · Cited by 294
A test of the hierarchical model of litter decomposition
Bradford, M. A., Veen, G. F., Bonis, A., Bradford, E. M., Classen, A. T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Crowther, T. W., De Long, J. R., Freschet, G. T., Kardol, P., et al. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0367-4 · Cited by 280
Processing Scalar Implicature: A Constraint‐Based Approach
Degen, J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12171 · Cited by 296
Linear mixed-effects models for within-participant psychology experiments: an introductory tutorial and free, graphical user interface (LMMgui)
Magezi, D. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00002 · Cited by 314
Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input
Lévy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T. J., & Rayner, K. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907664106 · Cited by 299
A cross-language perspective on speech information rate
Pellegrino, F., Coupé, C., & Marsico, E. (2011) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2011.0057 · Cited by 330
The Utility and Application of Mixed‐Effects Models in Second Language Research
Linck, J. A., & Cunnings, I. (2015) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12117 · Cited by 283
Young Children Share the Spoils After Collaboration
Warneken, F., Lohse, K., Melis, A. P., & Tomasello, M. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610395392 · Cited by 295
On the Front Line: Quantitative Virus Dynamics in Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) Colonies along a New Expansion Front of the Parasite Varroa destructor
Mondet, F., de Miranda, J. R., Kretzschmar, A., Conte, Y. L., & Mercer, A. R. (2014) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004323 · Cited by 277
Statistical methods for linguistic research: Foundational Ideas—Part II
Nicenboim, B., & Vasishth, S. (2016) · Language and Linguistics Compass · doi:10.1111/lnc3.12207 · Cited by 285
Art in Time and Space: Context Modulates the Relation between Art Experience and Viewing Time
Brieber, D., Nadal, M., Leder, H., & Rosenberg, R. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099019 · Cited by 302
Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time.
Casasanto, D. J., & Bottini, R. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0033297 · Cited by 263
Are Automatic Conceptual Cores the Gold Standard of Semantic Processing? The Context‐Dependence of Spatial Meaning in Grounded Congruency Effects
Lebois, L. A. M., Wilson‐Mendenhall, C. D., & Barsalou, L. W. (2014) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12174 · Cited by 266
The Social Origins of Sustained Attention in One-Year-Old Human Infants
Yu, C., & Smith, L. B. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.026 · Cited by 255
The Cognitive Dynamics of Negated Sentence Verification
Dale, R. A. C., & Duran, N. D. (2011) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01164.x · Cited by 262
Triangulating the Neural, Psychological, and Economic Bases of Guilt Aversion
Chang, L. J., Smith, A., Dufwenberg, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.056 · Cited by 260
Info/information theory: Speakers choose shorter words in predictive contexts
Mahowald, K., Fedorenko, E. G., Piantadosi, S. T., & Gibson, E. A. F. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.010 · Cited by 260
Toward a principled Bayesian workflow in cognitive science.
Schad, D. J., Betancourt, M., & Vasishth, S. (2021) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000275 · Cited by 252
An overview of mixed-effects statistical models for second language researchers
Cunnings, I. (2012) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658312443651 · Cited by 251
Revisiting olfactory classical conditioning of the proboscis extension response in honey bees: A step toward standardized procedures
Matsumoto, Y., Menzel, R., Sandoz, J., & Giurfa, M. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.08.018 · Cited by 251
Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
Mattys, S., Brooks, J. L., & Cooke, M. (2009) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.04.001 · Cited by 256
Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention
Kliegl, R., Wei, P., Dambacher, M., Yan, M., & Zhou, X. (2010) · Front. Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00238 · Cited by 239
Plant foods and the dietary ecology of Neanderthals and early modern humans
Henry, A. G., Brooks, A. S., & Piperno, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Human Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.12.014 · Cited by 248
Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction
Vasishth, S., Nicenboim, B., Beckman, M. E., Li, F., & Kong, E. J. (2018) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2018.07.008 · Cited by 246
Early morphological processing is morphosemantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition
Feldman, L. B., O’Connor, P. A., & del Prado Martín, F. M. (2009) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.16.4.684 · Cited by 203
The Hippocampal Film Editor: Sensitivity and Specificity to Event Boundaries in Continuous Experience
Ben-Yakov, A., & Henson, R. N. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0524-18.2018 · Cited by 268
Eye-Tracking: A Guide for Applied Linguistics Research
Conklin, K., Pellicer‐Sánchez, A., & Carrol, G. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108233279 · Cited by 213
The Generalizability CrisisPreprint
Yarkoni, T. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/jqw35 · Cited by 290
Practice Effects in Large-Scale Visual Word Recognition Studies: A Lexical Decision Study on 14,000 Dutch Mono- and Disyllabic Words and Nonwords
Keuleers, E., Diependaele, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2010) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174 · Cited by 241

Authors: Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M.
Affiliations: University of Alberta (CA)
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author: Baayen, R.H.
ORCID: Baayen, R.H.
Bates, D.M.
Venue: Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2008-11
Volume: 59
Issue: 4
Pages: 390-412
ISSN: 0749-596X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
OpenAlex: W2125001590
Cited by: 8,540
References: 73
Citations by year: 2026: 412 · 2025: 499 · 2024: 461 · 2023: 533 · 2022: 630 · 2021: 686 · 2020: 636 · 2019: 639 · 2018: 585 · 2017: 559 · 2016: 563 · 2015: 509 · 2014: 439 · 2013: 420 · 2012: 380
FWCI: 183.09
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
hdl.handle.net
Licence: other-oa
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords: mixed models, crossed random effects, repeated measurement data, random regression models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks