Cited by 534Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismCategorization, perception, and language

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examples of mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects and with binomial data

Quené, Hugo, van den Bergh, Huub·2008·Journal of Memory and Language

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.002

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 49 references

2 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bailey, 1982, Confounding, Vol. 2, 128
  2. Bates, 2005, Fitting linear models in R: Using the lme4 package, R News, 5, 27

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 534

Metadata

Authors
Quené, H., & van den Bergh, H.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Quené, Hugo
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
413-425
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988055263
Cited by
534
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 33
FWCI
20.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Utrecht
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
mixed models, crossed random effects, binomial data, generalized linear mixed models, repeated measures ANOVA, type I error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review