Cited by 87Temporomandibular Joint DisordersMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Intraoral Myofascial Therapy for Chronic Myogenous Temporomandibular Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Kalamir, Allan, Bonello, Rodney, Graham, Petra, Vitiello, Andrew L., Pollard, Henry·2012·Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Abstract

Objective Studies investigating the efficacy of intraoral myofascial therapies (IMTs) for chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD) are rare. The present study was an expansion of a previously published pilot study that investigated whether chiropractic IMT and the addition of education and self-care were superior to no-treatment or IMT alone for 5 outcome measures-interincisal opening range, jaw pain at rest, jaw pain upon opening, jaw pain upon clenching, and global reporting of change-over the course of 1 year. Methods Ninety-three participants with myogenous TMD between the ages of 18 and 50 years experiencing chronic jaw pain of longer than 3 months in duration were recruited for the study. Successful applicants were randomized into 1 of 3 groups: (1) IMT consisting of 2 treatment interventions per week for 5 weeks, (2) IMT plus education and "self-care" exercises (IMTESC), and (3) wait-list control. The main outcome measures were used. Range of motion findings were measured by vernier callipers in millimeters, and pain scores were quantified using an 11-point self-reported graded chronic pain scale. Global reporting of change was a 7-point self-reported scale, balanced positively and negatively around a zero midpoint. Results There were statistically significant differences in resting, opening and clenching pain, opening scores, and global reporting of change (P Conclusions The study suggests that both chiropractic IMT and IMTESC were superior to no-treatment of chronic…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.09.004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalamir, A., Bonello, R., Graham, P., Vitiello, A. L., & Pollard, H.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Health Sciences University (GB)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Kalamir, Allan
Venue
Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
Published
2012-01
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
26-37
ISSN
0161-4754 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108614557
Cited by
87
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Orthodontics › Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Keywords
myogenous temporomandibular disorders, chiropractic treatment, patient education
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mouth, Pain Measurement, Patient Education as Topic, Pilot Projects, Reference Values, Self Care, Severity of Illness Index, Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Manipulation, Chiropractic, Young Adult, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review