Cited by 3Child Nutrition and Feeding IssuesEating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Variables Associated With the Use of Complete Oral Calorie Supplements in Children With Feeding Problems

Williams, Keith E., Hendy, Helen M.·2014·Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior

Abstract

Objective To examine child and parent variables associated with complete oral calorie supplement use among children with feeding problems.Design Correlational examination of data from patient intake surveys.Setting Hospital-based feeding program.Participants Participants included 281 parents of children referred to a hospital-based feeding clinic, including 114 who received supplements (70.2% boys; mean age, 60.1 months) and 167 who did not receive (79.6% boys; mean age, 67.5 months).Variables measured Children's age, gender, weight status, diagnostic category (no special needs, autism, or other special needs), supplement intake, oral motor problems, child mealtime behavior (using the Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire), parent feeding practices (using the Parent Mealtime Action Scale), and diet variety for child and parent.Analysis Chi-square analyses compared children who did and did not receive supplements for their percentage of gender, diagnostic, and weight status categories; t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests compared children who did and did not receive supplements, for age, oral motor problems, children's mealtime behavior, parent feeding practices, and diet variety.Results Compared with children who did not receive nutritional supplements, those who did were younger (P < .01) and more underweight (P < .001), and showed less Food Responsiveness (P < .001), less Food Enjoyment (P < .001), more Food Satiety (P < .001, and more Slow Eating (P < .001), and their parents were more likely to use Insistence on Eating (P < .001).Conclusions Whereas supplement use was related to underweight, 78.2% of children receiving them were normal weight or overweight, which suggests that supplements are being used to address mealtime selective eating. The use of supplements should be considered carefully because they do not appear to increase diet variety and may increase the chance of overweight over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.01.003

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, K. E., & Hendy, H. M.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
236-240
ISSN
1499-4046 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086687885
Cited by
3
References
19
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
feeding difficulties, children, mealtime behavior, food responsiveness, food enjoyment, slow eating, parental feeding practices, dietary diversity, underweight, autism spectrum disorder, child eating behavior
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Formulated, Humans, Infant, Male, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Diet Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review